Cited by 380RNA Interference and Gene DeliveryCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA Research and Splicing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High-throughput RNAi screening in cultured cells: a user's guide

Open access
Echeverri, Christophe J., Perrimon, Norbert·2006·Nature Reviews Genetics

Abstract

RNA interference has re-energized the field of functional genomics by enabling genome-scale loss-of-function screens in cultured cells. Looking back on the lessons that have been learned from the first wave of technology developments and applications in this exciting field, we provide both a user's guide for newcomers to the field and a detailed examination of some more complex issues, particularly concerning optimization and quality control, for more advanced users. From a discussion of cell lines, screening paradigms, reagent types and read-out methodologies, we explore in particular the complexities of designing optimal controls and normalization strategies for these challenging but extremely powerful studies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrg1836

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 78 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Echalier, G. Drosophila Cell in Culture (Academic Press, New York, 1997).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 380

Metadata

Authors
Echeverri, C. J., & Perrimon, N.
Affiliations
  • Cenix BioScience (Germany) (DE)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Venue
Nature Reviews Genetics
Published
2006-04-11
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
373-384
ISSN
  • 1471-0056 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0064
OpenAlex
W1968410036
Cited by
380
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 23
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
Keywords
RNA interference, high-throughput screening, loss-of-function screen, functional genomics, cell lines, screening optimization, quality control, normalization strategies, control system design
MeSH terms
Animals, Automation, Cells, Cultured, Drosophila melanogaster, Humans, Models, Biological, Phenotype, Quality Control, Gene Transfer Techniques, Gene Expression Profiling, RNA Interference, RNA, Small Interfering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review