Cited by 147Gut microbiota and healthCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies

The breakthrough of the microbiota

Kroemer, Guido, Zitvogel, Laurence·2018·Nature Reviews Immunology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nri.2018.4

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kroemer, G., & Zitvogel, L.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
  • Kroemer, Guido
  • Zitvogel, Laurence
Venue
Nature Reviews Immunology
Published
2018-01-30
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
87-88
ISSN
  • 1474-1733 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-1741
OpenAlex
W2787841233
Cited by
147
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 13
FWCI
7.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Seerave Foundation
  • Ligue Contre le Cancer
  • Fondation Gustave Roussy
  • H2020 European Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Keywords
gut microbiota, cancer immunotherapy, immunotherapy response, prognostic factors, antineoplastic therapy, mouse model, microbiota-targeted therapy
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Fecal Microbiota Transplantation, Animals, Humans, Immunotherapy, Neoplasms, Prognosis, Biomarkers, Tumor, Models, Immunological, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review