Cited by 17Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Advances in cell‐based biosensors using three‐dimensional cell‐encapsulating hydrogels

Zhou, Lihong, Huang, Guoyou, Wang, Shuqi, Wu, Jinhui, Lee, Won Gu, Chen, Yongmei, Xu, Feng, Lu, Tianjian·2011·Biotechnology Journal

Abstract

Cell‐based biosensors (CBBs) have emerged as promising biotechnical tools whereby various cell types can be used as basic sensing units to detect external stimuli. Specifically, CBBs have been applied in environmental monitoring, drug screening, clinical diagnosis and biosecurity. For these applications, CBBs offer several advantages over conventional molecular‐based biosensors or living animal‐based approaches, such as the capability to better mimic physiological situations, to enhance detection specificity and sensitivity, and to detect unknown compounds and toxins. On the other hand, existing CBBs suffer from several limitations, such as weak cell‐substrate attachment, two‐dimensional (2D) cell microenvironment, and limited shelf life. An emerging method for scaffold‐free three‐dimensional (3D) cell culture uses hydrogels to encapsulate cells. Advances in novel biomaterials and nano/microscale technologies have enabled encapsulation of cells in hydrogels to fabricate 3D CBBs, which hold great potential for addressing the limitation in existing 2D CBBs. Here, we present an overview of the emerging hydrogel‐based CBBs, their applications in pathogen/toxin detection, drug screening and screening of cell‐biomaterials interaction, and the associated challenges and potential solutions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/biot.201100098

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 3D models can better replicate intrinsic physiological conditions and in vivo cellular responses to external stimuli compared to the 2D monolayer.

    “Therefore, 3D models can better replicate intrinsic physiological conditions and in vivo cellular responses to external stimuli compared to the 2D monolayer. 77,78,80-82”
  • Hydrogel-based 3D cell culture systems can better represent the in vivo distribution of metabolites, nutrients, oxygen, and signaling molecules.

    “Many 3D cell culture-based biosensors use the similar design as Figure 5A using natural or synthetic hydrogels to create 3D cell structures, since such systems can better represent the in vivo distribution of metabolites, nutrients, oxygen, and signaling molecules, 80”
  • Collagen, collagen-chitosan, Matrigel, fibrinogen matrices, alginate, Puramatrix scaffolds, and polyethylene glycol matrices have been used to fabricate 3D cell culture biosensors using various cell lines for drug screening, toxicology assays, cell-biomaterial interaction screening, and identification of unknown pathogens and toxins.

    “Collagen, collagen-chitosan, Matrigel, and fibrinogen matrices, alginate, Puramatrix scaffolds, and polyethylene glycol matrices have been used to fabricate 3D cell culture biosensors using various cell lines for drug screening, toxicology assays, and cell-biomaterial interaction screening, and for the identification of unknown pathogens and toxins. 80,86,87”
  • Biomaterial properties can modify cell behavior by influencing cell proliferation, survival, shape, migration, differentiation, as well as gene expression.

    “Another application of 3D biosensors is the rapid screening of cellbiomaterial interactions since biomaterial properties can modify cell behavior by influencing cell proliferation, survival, shape, migration, differentiation, as well as gene expression. 80”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, L., Huang, G., Wang, S., Wu, J., Lee, W. G., Chen, Y., Xu, F., & Lu, T.
Affiliations
  • Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology (CN)
  • Kyung Hee University (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Xu, Feng
  • Lu, Tianjian
Venue
Biotechnology Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-12
Volume
6
Issue
12
Pages
1466-1476
ISSN
  • 1860-6768 (ISSN-L)
  • 1860-7314
OpenAlex
W2166569459
Cited by
17
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biotechnology Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Keywords
cell-based biosensors, 3D cell culture, pathogen detection, toxin detection, drug screening, cell-material interactions, environmental monitoring, diagnosis, biosecurity
MeSH terms
Animals, Biotechnology, Cytological Techniques, Cell Biology, Humans, Biosensing Techniques, Hydrogels, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review