Cited by 286Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingMemory and Neural Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 125 of the 127 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Integration of biochemical signalling in spines

Abstract

Short-term and long-term changes in the strength of synapses in neural networks underlie working memory and long-term memory storage in the brain. These changes are regulated by many biochemical signalling pathways in the postsynaptic spines of excitatory synapses. Recent findings about the roles and regulation of the small GTPases Ras, Rap and Rac in spines provide new insights into the coordination and cooperation of different pathways to effect synaptic plasticity. Here, we present an initial working representation of the interactions of five signalling cascades that are usually studied individually. We discuss their integrated function in the regulation of postsynaptic plasticity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrn1685

Cites

125 of 125 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 127 references

2 of the 127 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Klee, C. B. in Calmodulin Vol. 5 (eds Cohen, P. & Klee, C. B.) 35–56 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988).
  2. Stiles, J. R., Bartol, T. M., Salpeter, M. M., Salpeter, E. & Sejnowski, T. J. in Synapses (eds Cowan, W. M., Stevens, C. F. & Sudhof, T. C.) 681–731 (Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, USA, 2001).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 286

Metadata

Authors
Kennedy, M. B., Beale, H. C., Carlisle, H. J., & Washburn, L. R.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Kennedy, Mary B.
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2005-06-01
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
423-434
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W2005797241
Cited by
286
References
127
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 38
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • John Douglas French Alzheimer's Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA030749)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P01NS044306)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
postsynaptic spines, synaptic plasticity, Ras, rap, Rac, small GTPases, excitatory synapses, working memory, long-term memory, signaling pathways
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Neuronal Plasticity, Synapses, Signal Transduction, Calcium Signaling, Dendritic Spines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review