Cited by 62Chronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases

Impact of treating the metabolic syndrome on chronic kidney disease

Agrawal, Varun, Shah, Aashish, Rice, Casey, Franklin, Barry A., McCullough, Peter A.·2009·Nature Reviews Nephrology

Abstract

The metabolic syndrome is defined by the concurrent presence of at least three metabolic disorders that are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Results from prospective and cross-sectional studies also point to an association between the metabolic syndrome and chronic kidney disease. Visceral obesity and insulin resistance are two important features of the metabolic syndrome that might explain renal injury. We reviewed the literature to examine whether treatment of the metabolic syndrome can favorably influence renal outcomes. Weight loss, regular exercise, and a low-calorie, low-fat diet are first-line treatments of the metabolic syndrome, yet few data are available to indicate that such lifestyle interventions can prevent or reverse renal damage. Similarly, results from few studies show little or no beneficial effect of blood pressure control, use of statins, fibrates, thiazolidinediones or metformin on renal parameters in patients with metabolic syndrome. The reasons for the lack of trials in this research field are also discussed. This Review identifies the need to improve understanding of the role of metabolic syndrome in chronic kidney disease, define consistent criteria for metabolic syndrome and perform clinical trials that analyze renal outcomes as primary end points.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrneph.2009.114

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Agrawal, V., Shah, A., Rice, C., Franklin, B. A., & McCullough, P. A.
Affiliations
  • Beaumont Health (US)
  • Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Agrawal, Varun
Venue
Nature Reviews Nephrology
Published
2009-07-28
Volume
5
Issue
9
Pages
520-528
ISSN
  • 1745-8323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-5061
  • 1759-507X
OpenAlex
W2041905961
Cited by
62
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Nephrology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
Keywords
metabolic syndrome, chronic kidney disease, renal outcomes, visceral obesity, insulin resistance, lifestyle intervention, weight loss, blood pressure control, statins, thiazolidinediones, metformin, fibrates, metabolic syndrome definitions, cardiovascular risk
MeSH terms
Antihypertensive Agents, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Risk Factors, Metabolic Syndrome, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review