Cited by 247Nerve injury and regenerationSpinal Cord Injury ResearchNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Injured adult neurons regress to an embryonic transcriptional growth state

Abstract

Grafts of spinal-cord-derived neural progenitor cells (NPCs) enable the robust regeneration of corticospinal axons and restore forelimb function after spinal cord injury 1; however, the molecular mechanisms that underlie this regeneration are unknown. Here we perform translational profiling specifically of corticospinal tract (CST) motor neurons in mice, to identify their 'regenerative transcriptome' after spinal cord injury and NPC grafting. Notably, both injury alone and injury combined with NPC grafts elicit virtually identical early transcriptomic responses in host CST neurons. However, in mice with injury alone this regenerative transcriptome is downregulated after two weeks, whereas in NPC-grafted mice this transcriptome is sustained. The regenerative transcriptome represents a reversion to an embryonic transcriptional state of the CST neuron. The huntingtin gene (Htt) is a central hub in the regeneration transcriptome; deletion of Htt significantly attenuates regeneration, which shows that Htt has a key role in neural plasticity after injury.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-020-2200-5

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 55 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 247

Metadata

Authors
Poplawski, G. H. D., Kawaguchi, R., Van Niekerk, E., Lu, P., Mehta, N., Canete, P., Lie, R., Dragatsis, I., Meves, J. M., Zheng, B., Coppola, G., & Tuszynski, M. H.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
Corresponding author
  • Poplawski, Gunnar H. D.
  • Tuszynski, Mark H.
Venue
Nature
Published
2020-04-15
Volume
581
Issue
7806
Pages
77-82
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W3016778275
Cited by
247
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 19
FWCI
16.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 RX002264)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P30NS062691)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
spinal cord injury, axon regeneration, huntingtin, neuroplasticity
MeSH terms
Huntingtin Protein, RNA-Seq, Animals, Axons, Disease Models, Animal, Embryo, Mammalian, Female, Nerve Regeneration, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Pyramidal Tracts, Spinal Cord Injuries, Transcription, Genetic, Protein Biosynthesis, Gene Expression Profiling, Cell Proliferation, Mice, Neural Stem Cells, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review