Cited by 437Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeurological disorders and treatments

Stimulation mapping of white matter tracts to study brain functional connectivity.

Duffau, Hugues·2015·Nature Reviews Neurology

Abstract

Despite advances in the new science of connectomics, which aims to comprehensively map neural connections at both structural and functional levels, techniques to directly study the function of white matter tracts in vivo in humans have proved elusive. Direct electrical stimulation (DES) mapping of the subcortical fibres offers a unique opportunity to investigate the functional connectivity of the brain. This original method permits real-time anatomo-functional correlations, especially with regard to neural pathways, in awake patients undergoing brain surgery. In this article, the goal is to review new insights, gained from axonal DES, into the functional connectivity underlying the sensorimotor, visuospatial, language and sociocognitive systems. Interactions between these neural networks and multimodal systems, such as working memory, attention, executive functions and consciousness, can also be investigated by axonal stimulation. In this networking model of conation and cognition, brain processing is not conceived as the sum of several subfunctions, but results from the integration and potentiation of parallel-though partially overlapping-subnetworks. This hodotopical account, supported by axonal DES, improves our understanding of neuroplasticity and its limitations. The clinical implications of this paradigmatic shift from localizationism to hodotopy, in the context of brain surgery, neurology, neurorehabilitation and psychiatry, are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.51

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duffau, H.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Duffau, Hugues
Venue
Nature Reviews Neurology
Published
2015-04-07
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
255-265
ISSN
  • 1759-4758 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-4766
OpenAlex
W2075437393
Cited by
437
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 11
FWCI
5.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
direct electrical stimulation, white matter tracts, functional connectivity, connectomics, localizationism, awake craniotomy, sensorimotor network, language network, working memory, attention, executive function, consciousness, neuroplasticity, neurorehabilitation
MeSH terms
Brain Neoplasms, Electric Stimulation, Glioma, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Mental Processes, Neural Pathways, Visual Pathways, Neurosurgical Procedures, Connectome, White Matter, Sensorimotor Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review