Cited by 638Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsRNA Research and SplicingNuclear Structure and Function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chromatin organization marks exon-intron structure

Schwartz, Schraga, Meshorer, Eran, Ast, Gil·2009·Nature Structural & Molecular Biology

Abstract

An increasing body of evidence indicates that transcription and splicing are coupled, and it is accepted that chromatin organization regulates transcription. Little is known about the cross-talk between chromatin structure and exon-intron architecture. By analysis of genome-wide nucleosome-positioning data sets from humans, flies and worms, we found that exons show increased nucleosome-occupancy levels with respect to introns, a finding that we link to differential GC content and nucleosome-disfavoring elements between exons and introns. Analysis of genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation data in humans and mice revealed four specific post-translational histone modifications enriched in exons. Our findings indicate that previously described enrichment of H3K36me3 modifications in exons reflects a more fundamental phenomenon, namely increased nucleosome occupancy along exons. Our results suggest an RNA polymerase II-mediated cross-talk between chromatin structure and exon-intron architecture, implying that exon selection may be modulated by chromatin structure.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nsmb.1659

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 57 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 638

Metadata

Authors
Schwartz, S., Meshorer, E., & Ast, G.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
Ast, Gil
Venue
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
Published
2009-08-16
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
990-995
ISSN
  • 1545-9985 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-9993
OpenAlex
W2155453721
Cited by
638
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 62
FWCI
27.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Structure and Function
Keywords
exon-intron structure, nucleosome occupancy, chromatin organization, transcription-splicing coupling, histone modifications, H3K36me3, GC content, exon selection, RNA polymerase II, chromatin immunoprecipitation, nucleosome positioning
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Composition, Chromatin, Exons, Histones, Humans, Introns, Methylation, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, RNA Polymerase II, RNA Splicing, Genome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review