Cited by 84Obesity, Physical Activity, DietHealth and Lifestyle StudiesBody Composition Measurement Techniques

Freshman 15: Fact or Fiction?

Open access
Morrow, Michelle L., Heesch, Kristiann C., Dinger, Mary K., Hull, Holly R., Kneehans, Allen W., Fields, David A.·2006·Obesity

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate changes in body weight, BMI, body composition, and fat distribution among freshman women during their 1st year of college. Research Methods and Procedures: Freshman women during the 2004 to 2005 academic year were recruited to participate. The initial baseline visit occurred within the first 6 weeks of the fall 2004 semester, with the follow‐up visit occurring during the last 6 weeks of the spring 2005 semester. At each visit, height, weight, BMI, waist and hip circumferences, and body composition (by DXA) were obtained. Results: One hundred thirty‐seven participants completed both the fall and spring visits. Significant (p < 0.0001) increases between the fall and spring visits were observed for body weight (58.6 vs. 59.6 kg), BMI (21.9 vs. 22.3), percentage body fat (28.9 vs. 29.7), total fat mass (16.9 vs. 17.7 kg), fat‐free mass (38.1 vs. 38.4 kg), waist circumference (69.4 vs. 70.3 cm), and hip circumference (97.4 vs. 98.6 cm), with no significant difference observed in the waist‐to‐hip ratio (0.71 vs. 0.71; p = 0.78). Discussion: Although statistically significant, changes in body weight, body composition, and fat mass were modest for women during their freshman year of college. These results do not support the purported “freshman 15” weight gain publicized in the popular media.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/oby.2006.163

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies have reported weight gains during the freshman year of college of 1.3 kg (Hoffman et al. 2006), 2.5 kg (Racette et al. 2005) and 1.1 kg (Morrow et al. 2006).

    “recent studies have still reported weight gains of 1.3 kg (Hoffman et al. 2006), 2.5 kg (Racette et al. 2005) and 1.1 kg (Morrow et al. 2006) [7-9].”

    From The effect of the Thanksgiving Holiday on weight gain (2006) · cites this paper as [9]

  • The widespread campus perception that freshman students gain an average of 15 pounds (6.8 kg) during their first year of study appears little more than a myth.

    “While the widespread campus perception that freshman students gain an average of 15 pounds (6.8 kg) during their first year of study appears little more than a myth”

    From The effect of the Thanksgiving Holiday on weight gain (2006) · cites this paper as [9]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Freshman 15, Morrow et al. OBESITY Vol. 14 No. 8 August 2006 1443 1930739x, 2006, 8, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1038/oby.2006.163 by Readcube (Labtiva Inc.), Wiley Online Library on [02/12/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morrow, M. L., Heesch, K. C., Dinger, M. K., Hull, H. R., Kneehans, A. W., & Fields, D. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Oklahoma (US)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
Corresponding author
Fields, David A.
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-08
Volume
14
Issue
8
Pages
1438-1443
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W2017807827
Cited by
84
References
22
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Oklahoma (M01-RR14467)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (M01-RR14467)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01 RR-14467, M01RR014467)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Lifestyle Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Keywords
Freshman 15, university students, weight gain, body composition, body mass index, body fat distribution, waist circumference, hip circumference, fat mass, fat-free mass, women
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Body Composition, Body Height, Body Weight, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Oklahoma, Students, Universities, Weight Gain, Body Mass Index, Waist-Hip Ratio, Overweight, Body Fat Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review