Cited by 8Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsMinimally Invasive Surgical Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Use of primary bariatric surgery among patients with obesity and diabetes. Insights from the Diabetes Collaborative Registry

Abstract

Despite its cardiometabolic benefits, bariatric surgery has historically been underused in patients with obesity and diabetes, but contemporary data are lacking. Among 1,520,182 patients evaluated from 2013 to 2019 within a multicenter, longitudinal, US registry of outpatients with diabetes, we found that 462,033 (30%) met eligibility for bariatric surgery. After a median follow-up of 854 days, 6310/384,859 patients (1.6%) underwent primary bariatric surgery, with a slight increase over time (0.38% per year [2013] to 0.68% per year [2018]). Patients who underwent bariatric surgery were more likely to be female (63% vs. 56%), white (87% vs. 82%), have higher body mass indices (42.1 ± 6.9 vs. 40.6 ± 5.9 kg/m 2), and depression (23% vs. 14%; p < 0.001 for all). Over a median (IQR) follow-up after surgery of 722 days (364-993), patients who underwent bariatric surgery had lost an average of 11.8 ± 18.5 kg (23% of excess body weight), 10.2% were on fewer glucose-lowering medications, and 8.4% were on fewer antihypertensives. Despite bariatric surgery being safer and more accessible over the past two decades, less than one in fifty eligible patients with diabetes receive this therapy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41366-022-01217-w

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jain, P., Hejjaji, V., Thomas, M. B., Garcia, R. A., Kennedy, K. F., Goyal, A., Sperling, L., Das, S. R., Hafida, S., Enriquez, J. R., & Arnold, S. V.
Affiliations
  • Saint Luke's Hospital (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Joslin Diabetes Center (US)
Corresponding author
Arnold, Suzanne V.
Venue
International Journal of Obesity
Published
2022-08-25
Volume
46
Issue
12
Pages
2163-2167
ISSN
  • 0307-0565 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5497
OpenAlex
W4293088534
Cited by
8
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
Keywords
bariatric surgery, obesity, type 2 diabetes, surgical eligibility, weight loss, depression, diabetes medication reduction, antihypertensive drugs, sex differences, racial disparities
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Male, Obesity, Obesity, Morbid, Registries, Retrospective Studies, Weight Loss, Bariatric Surgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review