The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial of intravenous ketamine as adjunctive therapy in treatment-resistant depression (TRD)
Open accessAbstract
Numerous placebo-controlled studies have demonstrated the ability of ketamine, an NMDA receptor antagonist, to induce rapid (within hours), transient antidepressant effects when administered intravenously (IV) at subanesthetic doses (0.5 mg/kg over 40 min). However, the optimal antidepressant dose remains unknown. We aimed to compare to active placebo the rapid acting antidepressant properties of a broad range of subanesthetic doses of IV ketamine among outpatients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). A range of IV ketamine doses were compared to active placebo in the treatment of adult TRD over a 3-day period following a single infusion over 40 min. This was an outpatient study conducted across six US academic sites. Outpatients were 18-70 years old with TRD, defined as failure to achieve a satisfactory response (e.g., less than 50% improvement of depression symptoms) to at least two adequate treatment courses during the current depressive episode. Following a washout period, 99 eligible subjects were randomly assigned to one of the five arms in a 1:1:1:1:1 fashion: a single intravenous dose of ketamine 0.1 mg/kg (n = 18), a single dose of ketamine 0.2 mg/kg (n = 20), a single dose of ketamine 0.5 mg/kg (n = 22), a single dose of ketamine 1.0 mg/kg (n = 20), and a single dose of midazolam 0.045 mg/kg (active placebo) (n = 19). The study assessments (HAM-D-6, MADRS, SDQ, PAS, CGI-S, and CGI-I) were performed at days 0, 1, 3 (endpoint), 5, 7, 14, and 30 to assess the safety and efficacy. The overall group × time interaction effect was significant for the primary outcome measure, the HAM-D-6. In post hoc pairwise comparisons controlling for multiple comparisons, standard dose (0.5 mg/kg) and high dose (1 mg/kg) of intravenous ketamine were superior to active placebo; a low dose (0.1 mg/kg) was significant only prior to adjustment (p = 0.02, p-adj = 0.14, d = -0.82 at day 1). Most of the interaction effect was due to differences at day 1, with no significant adjusted pairwise differences at day 3. This pattern generally held for secondary outcomes. The infusions of ketamine were relatively well tolerated compared to active placebo, except for greater dissociative symptoms and transient blood pressure elevations with the higher doses. Our results suggest that there is evidence for the efficacy of the 0.5 mg/kg and 1.0 mg/kg subanesthetic doses of IV ketamine and no clear or consistent evidence for clinically meaningful efficacy of lower doses of IV ketamine. Trial Registration: NCT01920555.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“The association between symptoms of derealization and antidepressant response is in line with the evidence base demonstrating a link between the dissociative and therapeutic effects of ketamine 58 .”
From Imaging the effect of ketamine on synaptic density (SV2A) in the living brain (2022) · cites this paper as [58]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hamilton, M. (1960) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56 · Cited by 32,817
A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure
(1979) · Scandinavian Journal of Statistics · doi:10.2307/4615733 · Cited by 21,526
A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change
Montgomery, S. A., & Åsberg, M. (1979) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.134.4.382 · Cited by 13,962
(1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 8,899
Trivedi, M. H., Rush, A. J., Wisniewski, S. R., Nierenberg, A. A., Warden, D., Ritz, L., Norquist, G., Howland, R. H., Lebowitz, B., McGrath, P. J., et al. (2006) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.163.1.28 · Cited by 3,879
Self-citationAntidepressant effects of ketamine in depressed patients
Berman, R. M., Cappiello, A., Anand, A., Oren, D. A., Heninger, G. R., Charney, D. S., & Krystal, J. H. (2000) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00230-9 · Cited by 3,856
A randomized trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in treatment-resistant major depression.
Zarate, C. A., Singh, J. B., Carlson, P. J., Brutsche, N. E., Ameli, R., Luckenbaugh, D. A., Charney, D. S., & Manji, H. K. (2006) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.63.8.856 · Cited by 3,766
The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research
Leon, A. C., Davis, L. L., & Kraemer, H. C. (2011) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.10.008 · Cited by 1,917
O’Reardon, J. P., Solvason, H. B., Janicak, P. G., Sampson, S., Isenberg, K. E., Nahas, Z., McDonald, W. M., Avery, D., Fitzgerald, P. B., Loo, C., et al. (2007) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.01.018 · Cited by 1,910
A scale for the assessment of hedonic tone the Snaith-Hamilton pleasure scale
Snaith, R. P., Hamilton, M., Morley, S., Humayan, A., Hargreaves, D., & Trigwell, P. (1995) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.167.1.99 · Cited by 1,778
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Fawcett J, Epstein P, Fiester SJ, Elkin I, Autry JH. Clinical management: imipramine/placebo administration manual. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1987;23:309–24.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
McIntyre, R. S., Alsuwaidan, M., Baune, B. T., Berk, M., Demyttenaere, K., Goldberg, J. F., Gorwood, P., Ho, R., Kasper, S., Kennedy, S. H., et al. (2023) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.21120 · Cited by 836
Self-citationMcIntyre, R. S., Rosenblat, J. D., Nemeroff, C. B., Sanacora, G., Murrough, J. W., Berk, M., Brietzke, E., Dodd, S., Gorwood, P., Ho, R., et al. (2021) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20081251 · Cited by 731
“There remains a lack of sufficient evidence to guide dose optimization with intravenous ketamine (54).”
BackgroundSelf-citationBahji, A., Vazquez, G. H., & Zarate, C. A. (2021) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.071 · Cited by 408
“…mg/kg IV, single HDRS Midazolam Daly 2018 (Daly et al., 2018) Parallel Non-TRD 133 57.0 45.4 Esketamine, adjunctive 28–84 mg twice/week IN MADRS Placebo Fava 2018 (Fava et al., 2018) Parallel TRD MDD 99 57.6 46.5 Racemic, adjunctive 0.1–1 mg/kg IV, single HDRS Midazolam J Affect Disord.”
InfluentialPharmacotherapy of Anxiety Disorders: Current and Emerging Treatment Options
Garakani, A., Murrough, J. W., Freire, R. C., Thom, R. P., Larkin, K., Buono, F. D., & Iosifescu, D. V. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.595584 · Cited by 440
Self-citationBlinding and expectancy confounds in psychedelic randomized controlled trials
Muthukumaraswamy, S. D., Forsyth, A., & Lumley, T. (2021) · Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1080/17512433.2021.1933434 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Fava, M., Freeman, M. P., Flynn, M., Judge, H., Hoeppner, B. B., Cusin, C., Ionescu, D. F., Mathew, S. J., Chang, L. C., Iosifescu, D. V., Murrough, J., Debattista, C., Schatzberg, A. F., Trivedi, M. H., Jha, M. K., Sanacora, G., Wilkinson, S. T., & Papakostas, G. I.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- Yale University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Molecular Psychiatry
- Published
- 2018-10-03
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1592-1603
- ISSN
- 1359-4184 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5578
- PMC
- PMC6447473
- OpenAlex
- W2895197076
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 23.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2019-01-07)
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Molecular Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (HHSN271201100006I)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
- Keywords
- treatment-resistant depression, intravenous ketamine, rapid-acting antidepressants, dose-response relationship, NMDA receptor antagonists, active placebo, antidepressant efficacy, depression severity, outpatients, antidepressant safety, CGI-S, CGI-I, adjunctive therapy, suicidal ideation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Depression, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Infusions, Intravenous, Ketamine, Male, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review