The DOI matches its Crossref record; 335 of the 335 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PROTACs: great opportunities for academia and industry
Open accessAbstract
Although many kinds of therapies are applied in the clinic, drug-resistance is a major and unavoidable problem. Another disturbing statistic is the limited number of drug targets, which are presently only 20–25% of all protein targets that are currently being studied. Moreover, the focus of current explorations of targets are their enzymatic functions, which ignores the functions from their scaffold moiety. As a promising and appealing technology, PROteolysis TArgeting Chimeras (PROTACs) have attracted great attention both from academia and industry for finding available approaches to solve the above problems. PROTACs regulate protein function by degrading target proteins instead of inhibiting them, providing more sensitivity to drug-resistant targets and a greater chance to affect the nonenzymatic functions. PROTACs have been proven to show better selectivity compared to classic inhibitors. PROTACs can be described as a chemical knockdown approach with rapidity and reversibility, which presents new and different biology compared to other gene editing tools by avoiding misinterpretations that arise from potential genetic compensation and/or spontaneous mutations. PRTOACs have been widely explored throughout the world and have outperformed not only in cancer diseases, but also in immune disorders, viral infections and neurodegenerative diseases. Although PROTACs present a very promising and powerful approach for crossing the hurdles of present drug discovery and tool development in biology, more efforts are needed to gain to get deeper insight into the efficacy and safety of PROTACs in the clinic. More target binders and more E3 ligases applicable for developing PROTACs are waiting for exploration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Akira, S., & Takeda, K. (2004) · Nature reviews. Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1391 · Cited by 8,312
Cell Signaling by Receptor Tyrosine Kinases
Lemmon, M. A., & Schlessinger, J. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.011 · Cited by 7,929
Vogelstein, B., Lane, D., & Levine, A. J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35042675 · Cited by 6,607
Identification of the transforming EML4–ALK fusion gene in non-small-cell lung cancer
Soda, M., Choi, Y. L., Enomoto, M., Takada, S., Yamashita, Y., Ishikawa, S., Fujiwara, S.-I., Watanabe, H., Kurashina, K., Hatanaka, H., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05945 · Cited by 5,439
Cancer drug resistance: an evolving paradigm
Holohan, C., Van Schaeybroeck, S., Longley, D. B., & Johnston, P. G. (2013) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3599 · Cited by 4,681
In Vivo Activation of the p53 Pathway by Small-Molecule Antagonists of MDM2
Vassilev, L. T., Vu, B. T., Graves, B., Carvajal, D., Podlaski, F., Filipovic, Z., Kong, N., Kammlott, U., Lukacs, C., Klein, C., et al. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1092472 · Cited by 4,661
MET Amplification Leads to Gefitinib Resistance in Lung Cancer by Activating ERBB3 Signaling
Engelman, J. A., Zejnullahu, K., Mitsudomi, T., Song, Y., Hyland, C., Park, J. O., Lindeman, N., Gale, C.-M., Zhao, X., Christensen, J., et al. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1141478 · Cited by 4,496
Self-citationSystematic RNA interference reveals that oncogenic KRAS-driven cancers require TBK1
Barbie, D. A., Tamayo, P., Boehm, J. S., Kim, S. Y., Moody, S. E., Dunn, I. F., Schinzel, A. C., Sandy, P., Meylan, E., Scholl, C., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08460 · Cited by 3,890
The Polycomb complex PRC2 and its mark in life
Margueron, R., & Reinberg, D. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09784 · Cited by 3,347
Regulation of Translation Initiation in Eukaryotes: Mechanisms and Biological Targets
Sonenberg, N., & Hinnebusch, A. G. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.042 · Cited by 3,304
Cited by
PROTACs: past, present and future
Li, K., & Crews, C. M. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d2cs00193d · Cited by 869
Advancing targeted protein degradation for cancer therapy
Dale, B., Cheng, M., Park, K.-S., Kaniskan, H. Ü., Xiong, Y., & Jin, J. (2021) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-021-00365-x · Cited by 632
Current strategies for the design of PROTAC linkers: a critical review
Troup, R. I., Fallan, C., & Baud, M. G. J. (2020) · Exploration of Targeted Anti-tumor Therapy · doi:10.37349/etat.2020.00018 · Cited by 424
“PROTAC warheads The warhead ligand can be readily substituted to develop degraders for myriad POIs, and this has enabled the rapid expansion of the modality to target proteins implicated in many diseases; degraders have now been reported against over 40 different cellular protein targets [2].”
BackgroundChemistries of bifunctional PROTAC degraders
Cao, C., He, M., Wang, L., He, Y., & Rao, Y. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d2cs00220e · Cited by 313
Self-citationPROTAC: An Effective Targeted Protein Degradation Strategy for Cancer Therapy
Qi, S.-M., Dong, J., Xu, Z.-Y., Cheng, X.-D., Zhang, W.-D., & Qin, J.-J. (2021) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2021.692574 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, X., Gao, H., Yang, Y., He, M., Wu, Y., Song, Y., Tong, Y., & Rao, Y.
- Venue
- Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
- Published
- 2019-12-24
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 64-64
- ISSN
- 2059-3635 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2996380129
- Cited by
- 613
- References
- 335
- FWCI
- 20.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PROTACs: great opportunities for academia and industry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41392-019-0101-6
- The paper
- Sun, X., Gao, H., Yang, Y., He, M., Wu, Y., Song, Y., Tong, Y., & Rao, Y. (2019). PROTACs: great opportunities for academia and industry. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-019-0101-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.