Cited by 229Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fear extinction requires infralimbic cortex projections to the basolateral amygdala

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Fear extinction involves the formation of a new memory trace that attenuates fear responses to a conditioned aversive memory, and extinction impairments are implicated in trauma- and stress-related disorders. Previous studies in rodents have found that the infralimbic prefrontal cortex (IL) and its glutamatergic projections to the basolateral amygdala (BLA) and basomedial amygdala (BMA) instruct the formation of fear extinction memories. However, it is unclear whether these pathways are exclusively involved in extinction, or whether other major targets of the IL, such as the nucleus accumbens (NAc) also play a role. To address this outstanding issue, the current study employed a combination of electrophysiological and chemogenetic approaches in mice to interrogate the role of IL-BLA and IL-NAc pathways in extinction. Specifically, we used patch-clamp electrophysiology coupled with retrograde tracing to examine changes in neuronal activity of the IL and prelimbic cortex (PL) projections to both the BLA and NAc following fear extinction. We found that extinction produced a significant increase in the intrinsic excitability of IL-BLA projection neurons, while extinction appeared to reverse fear-induced changes in IL-NAc projection neurons. To establish a causal counterpart to these observations, we then used a pathway-specific Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs (DREADD) strategy to selectively inhibit PFC-BLA projection neurons during extinction acquisition. Using this approach, we found that DREADD-mediated inhibition of PFC-BLA neurons during extinction acquisition impaired subsequent extinction retrieval. Taken together, our findings provide further evidence for a critical contribution of the IL-BLA neural circuit to fear extinction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41398-018-0106-x

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Distinct mPFC projections to the BLA and NAc. a The retrograde tracer CTB separately labeled with Alexa 488 and Alexa 555 was injected into the NAc and BLA. b Representative image of injection sites in the BLA and NAc. c Injection of tracers led to dense, but non-overlapping labeling of cells in the IL and PL. d Quantification of fluorescent cells revealed dense, non-overlapping labeling of BLA and NAc outputs throughout the PFC that was concentrated in the superficial layers of IL. Scale bar represents 100 µm. All the data presented are mean ± SEM. n = 18 images from N = 6 mice
Fig. 1 Distinct mPFC projections to the BLA and NAc. a The retrograde tracer CTB separately labeled with Alexa 488 and Alexa 555 was injected into the NAc and BLA. b Representative image of injection sites in the BLA and NAc. c Injection of tracers led to dense, but non-overlapping labeling of cells in the IL and PL. d Quantification of fluorescent cells revealed dense, non-overlapping labeling of BLA and NAc outputs throughout the PFC that was concentrated in the superficial layers of IL. Scale bar represents 100 µm. All the data presented are mean ± SEM. n = 18 images from N = 6 miceCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Extinction increases neuronal excitability in the IL-BLA, but not PL-BLA, pathway. a Retrobeads were injected into the BLA to visualize IL-BLA and PL-BLA projection neurons for electrophysiology recordings. b Fear conditioning increased freezing across CS-US pairings. c Fear extinction decreased freezing across CS trial-blocks. In IL-BLA projection neurons, fear conditioning resulted in (d) increased resting membrane potential that was not present after extinction. In IL-BLA neurons, following extinction training there was also (e) higher action potential threshold, (f) lower rheobase, and (g) an increase in the number of action potentials fired across increasing current injections. (Inset) Representative traces of current-injected firing during the final step of an increasing current injection protocol. In PL-BLA projections neurons, there were no differences in (h) resting membrane potential, (i) action potential threshold, (j) rheobase, or (k) action potential number with increasing current injection magnitude. The data presented are tests completed at resting membrane potential. All the data presented are mean ± SEM. The data were collected from N = 6 mice per group. In the infralimbic cortex there were n = 8 cells per experiment in the naive group, n = 8 cells in the fear learning group, and n = 10 cells in the fear extinction group. In the prelimbic cortex, there were n = 8 cells per experiment in the naive group, n = 5 cells in the fear learning group, and n = 4 cells in the fear extinction group. “*” denotes p < 0.05
Fig. 2 Extinction increases neuronal excitability in the IL-BLA, but not PL-BLA, pathway. a Retrobeads were injected into the BLA to visualize IL-BLA and PL-BLA projection neurons for electrophysiology recordings. b Fear conditioning increased freezing across CS-US pairings. c Fear extinction decreased freezing across CS trial-blocks. In IL-BLA projection neurons, fear conditioning resulted in (d) increased resting membrane potential that was not present after extinction. In IL-BLA neurons, following extinction training there was also (e) higher action potential threshold, (f) lower rheobase, and (g) an increase in the number of action potentials fired across increasing current injections. (Inset) Representative traces of current-injected firing during the final step of an increasing current injection protocol. In PL-BLA projections neurons, there were no differences in (h) resting membrane potential, (i) action potential threshold, (j) rheobase, or (k) action potential number with increasing current injection magnitude. The data presented are tests completed at resting membrane potential. All the data presented are mean ± SEM. The data were collected from N = 6 mice per group. In the infralimbic cortex there were n = 8 cells per experiment in the naive group, n = 8 cells in the fear learning group, and n = 10 cells in the fear extinction group. In the prelimbic cortex, there were n = 8 cells per experiment in the naive group, n = 5 cells in the fear learning group, and n = 4 cells in the fear extinction group. “*” denotes p < 0.05CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Extinction does not increase neuronal excitability in the IL-NAc or PL-NAc pathways. a Retrobeads were injected into the NAc to visualize IL-NAc projection neurons for electrophysiology recordings. b Fear conditioning increased freezing across CS-US pairings. c Fear extinction decreased freezing across CS trial-block. In IL-NAc projection neurons, there were no differences following fear conditioning or fear extinction in (h) resting membrane potential, (i) action potential threshold, or (j) rheobase. (g) There was a significant reduction in the number of action potentials fired in the fear conditioning group when recordings were performed at −70 mV, but was not present when performed at resting membrane potential. In PL-NAc projections neurons, there were no differences in (h) resting membrane potential, (i) action potential threshold, (j) rheobase, or (k) action potential number with increasing current injection magnitude. All the data presented are mean ± SEM. The data were collected from N = 4 mice per group. In the infralimbic cortex, there were n = 8 cells per experiment in the naive group, n = 6 cells in the fear learning group, and n = 8 cells in the fear extinction group. In the prelimbic cortex, there were n = 9 cells per experiment in the naive group, n = 6 cells in the fear learning group, and n = 6 cells in the fear extinction group. * denotes p < 0.05
Fig. 3 Extinction does not increase neuronal excitability in the IL-NAc or PL-NAc pathways. a Retrobeads were injected into the NAc to visualize IL-NAc projection neurons for electrophysiology recordings. b Fear conditioning increased freezing across CS-US pairings. c Fear extinction decreased freezing across CS trial-block. In IL-NAc projection neurons, there were no differences following fear conditioning or fear extinction in (h) resting membrane potential, (i) action potential threshold, or (j) rheobase. (g) There was a significant reduction in the number of action potentials fired in the fear conditioning group when recordings were performed at −70 mV, but was not present when performed at resting membrane potential. In PL-NAc projections neurons, there were no differences in (h) resting membrane potential, (i) action potential threshold, (j) rheobase, or (k) action potential number with increasing current injection magnitude. All the data presented are mean ± SEM. The data were collected from N = 4 mice per group. In the infralimbic cortex, there were n = 8 cells per experiment in the naive group, n = 6 cells in the fear learning group, and n = 8 cells in the fear extinction group. In the prelimbic cortex, there were n = 9 cells per experiment in the naive group, n = 6 cells in the fear learning group, and n = 6 cells in the fear extinction group. * denotes p < 0.05CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 Chemogenetic inhibition of IL-BLA projections impairs long-term extinction memory formation. a HSV was injected into the BLA and KORD or a control virus was injected into the IL to selectively inhibit IL-BLA projections. Representative images of (b) KORD and (c) eYFP expression in the IL. d Mice were fear conditioned on day 1, then injected with Sal-B prior to extinction acquisition on day 2 and tested, drug-free, for extinction retrieval on day 3. Bottom row, PFC-BLA behavior cohort: (e) Fear conditioning increased freezing across CS-US pairings. f Fear extinction decreased freezing across CS presentations, irrespective of IL-BLA inhibition. g IL-BLA inhibition during extinction acquisition impaired extinction memory retrieval. All data presented are mean ± SEM. N = 8 KORD mice and N = 10 controls. * denotes p < 0.05
Fig. 4 Chemogenetic inhibition of IL-BLA projections impairs long-term extinction memory formation. a HSV was injected into the BLA and KORD or a control virus was injected into the IL to selectively inhibit IL-BLA projections. Representative images of (b) KORD and (c) eYFP expression in the IL. d Mice were fear conditioned on day 1, then injected with Sal-B prior to extinction acquisition on day 2 and tested, drug-free, for extinction retrieval on day 3. Bottom row, PFC-BLA behavior cohort: (e) Fear conditioning increased freezing across CS-US pairings. f Fear extinction decreased freezing across CS presentations, irrespective of IL-BLA inhibition. g IL-BLA inhibition during extinction acquisition impaired extinction memory retrieval. All data presented are mean ± SEM. N = 8 KORD mice and N = 10 controls. * denotes p < 0.05CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Cho, J. H., Deisseroth, K. & Bolshakov, V. Y. Synaptic encoding of fear extinction in mPFC-amygdala circuits. Neuron 80, 1491–1507 (2013). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–229 of 229

Metadata

Authors
Bloodgood, D. W., Sugam, J. A., Holmes, A., & Kash, T. L.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Kash, Thomas L.
Venue
Translational Psychiatry
Published
2018-03-06
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
60-60
ISSN
2158-3188 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2952322062
Cited by
229
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 10
FWCI
13.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Translational Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (F31AA025835, R01AA019454, U01AA020911)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (U01MH105892)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (T32DA007244)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
fear extinction, infralimbic cortex, basolateral amygdala, nucleus accumbens, prelimbic cortex, glutamatergic projections, intrinsic excitability, memory extinction, extinction retrieval, trauma and stress-related disorders, chemogenetic inhibition, DREADD
MeSH terms
Animals, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Nucleus Accumbens, Prefrontal Cortex, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Mice, Electrophysiological Phenomena, Basolateral Nuclear Complex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review