Cited by 103melanin and skin pigmentationGenetic Associations and EpidemiologySkin Protection and Aging

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genome-wide association study in 176,678 Europeans reveals genetic loci for tanning response to sun exposure

Open access

Abstract

The skin’s tendency to sunburn rather than tan is a major risk factor for skin cancer. Here we report a large genome-wide association study of ease of skin tanning in 176,678 subjects of European ancestry. We identify significant association with tanning ability at 20 loci. We confirm previously identified associations at six of these loci, and report 14 novel loci, of which ten have never been associated with pigmentation-related phenotypes. Our results also suggest that variants at the AHR/AGR3 locus, previously associated with cutaneous malignant melanoma the underlying mechanism of which is poorly understood, might act on disease risk through modulation of tanning ability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-018-04086-y

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Manhattan plot of ease of skin tanning results in the UKBB data set. The P values were obtained by logistic regression analysis assuming an additive genetic model with sex and the first five principal components of the genotype data as covariates. The x-axis shows the genomic coordinates (GRCh37.p13) of the tested SNPs and the y-axis shows the –log10 P value of their association. The horizontal red line indicates the threshold for genome-wide significance at 5.0 × 10−8. The ten genes that failed replication are indicated by *; genes newly associated with tanning ability are reported in orange
Fig. 1 Manhattan plot of ease of skin tanning results in the UKBB data set. The P values were obtained by logistic regression analysis assuming an additive genetic model with sex and the first five principal components of the genotype data as covariates. The x-axis shows the genomic coordinates (GRCh37.p13) of the tested SNPs and the y-axis shows the –log10 P value of their association. The horizontal red line indicates the threshold for genome-wide significance at 5.0 × 10−8. The ten genes that failed replication are indicated by *; genes newly associated with tanning ability are reported in orangeCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hysi, P. G. et al. A GWAS meta-analysis of more than 300,000 individuals of European ancestry identifies numerous new genetic loci explaining significant portions of hair color variation and heritability. Nat. Genet. In press NG-LE44861R1 (2018).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Visconti, A., Duffy, D. L., Liu, F., Zhu, G., Wu, W., Chen, Y., Hysi, P. G., Zeng, C., Sanna, M., Iles, M. M., Kanetsky, P. A., Demenais, F., Hamer, M. A., Uitterlinden, A. G., Ikram, M. A., Nijsten, T., Martin, N. G., Kayser, M., Spector, T. D., Han, J., Bataille, V., & Falchi, M.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • Moffitt Cancer Center (US)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Falchi, Mario
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2018-05-08
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
1684-1684
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2799394553
Cited by
103
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 5
FWCI
6.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (P01 CA87969, R01 CA49449, 081878/Z/06/Z, UM1 CA186107, 081878, UM1 CA167552)
  • QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (P01 CA87969, R01 CA49449, NF-SI-0507-10228, UM1 CA167552, UM1 CA186107, NF-SI-0514-10027)
  • British Skin Foundation (5044i)
  • King's College London
  • European Commission (UM1 CA186107, P01 CA87969, UM1 CA167552, R01 CA49449)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (91651507)
  • ZonMw
  • Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ca049449-19, NIH-R01, R01 CA49449, CA-49449, UM1-CA167552, CA-167552, CA186107, CA 87969)
  • Medical Research Council (UM1 CA167552, UM1 CA186107, R01 CA49449, P01 CA87969)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (UM1 CA186107, P01 CA87969)
  • National Cancer Institute (P01CA087969, R01‐CA049449, UM1CA186107, UM1CA167552, U01CA167552)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
Keywords
tanning, sun exposure, skin pigmentation, genetic loci, skin cancer risk, sunburn, cutaneous melanoma, novel genetic variants, European ancestry
MeSH terms
Radiation Exposure, Adult, Aged, Carrier Proteins, Chromosome Mapping, Female, United Kingdom, Hair Color, Humans, Male, Melanoma, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Proteins, Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced, Phenotype, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Skin Neoplasms, Sunburn, Receptors, Aryl Hydrocarbon, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, White People, Genome-Wide Association Study, Suntan, Genetic Loci

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review