Cited by 101Motor Control and AdaptationNeural dynamics and brain functionMemory and Neural Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

Different population dynamics in the supplementary motor area and motor cortex during reaching

Open access
Lara, A. H., Cunningham, J. P., Churchland, M. M.·2018·Nature Communications

Abstract

Neural populations perform computations through their collective activity. Different computations likely require different population-level dynamics. We leverage this assumption to examine neural responses recorded from the supplementary motor area (SMA) and motor cortex. During visually guided reaching, the respective roles of these areas remain unclear; neurons in both areas exhibit preparation-related activity and complex patterns of movement-related activity. To explore population dynamics, we employ a novel "hypothesis-guided" dimensionality reduction approach. This approach reveals commonalities but also stark differences: linear population dynamics, dominated by rotations, are prominent in motor cortex but largely absent in SMA. In motor cortex, the observed dynamics produce patterns resembling muscle activity. Conversely, the non-rotational patterns in SMA co-vary with cues regarding when movement should be initiated. Thus, while SMA and motor cortex display superficially similar single-neuron responses during visually guided reaching, their different population dynamics indicate they are likely performing quite different computations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-018-05146-z

Cites

66 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 66 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Petreska, B. et al. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 24 (eds Shawe-Taylor, J. et al.) 756–764 (Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, New York, 2011).
  2. Munoz, D. P. & Schall, J. D. in The Oculomotor System: New Approaches for Studying Sensorimotor Integration. (eds Hall, W. C. & Moschovakis, A. K.) 52–82 (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2003).
  3. Gao, Y., Archer, E., Paninski, L. & Cunningham, J. P. 30th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) (Barcelona, Spain, 2016).
  4. Macke, J. H. et al. Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) (Lake Tahoe, CA, USA, 2016).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 101

Metadata

Authors
Lara, A. H., Cunningham, J. P., & Churchland, M. M.
Affiliations
Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Churchland, M. M.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2018-07-16
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
2754-2754
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2832227888
Cited by
101
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 4
FWCI
7.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)
Funders
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • Simons Foundation (SCGB#542957, SCGB#325233, 325233)
  • McKnight Foundation (P30 EY019007)
  • Searle Scholars Program
  • National Institutes of Health (EY019007)
  • N. Bud Grossman Center for Memory Research and Care
  • National Eye Institute (P30EY019007)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS092350, U19NS104649, DP2NS083037, F32NS092350, R01NS100066)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
supplementary motor area, motor cortex, population dynamics, visually guided reaching, movement-related activity, motor preparation, muscle activity, population coding
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Mapping, Electrodes, Implanted, Electroencephalography, Electromyography, Hand, Macaca mulatta, Male, Motor Cortex, Motor Neurons, Movement, Neural Pathways, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Stereotaxic Techniques, Range of Motion, Articular, Muscle, Skeletal, Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review