CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 113Protein Degradation and InhibitorsUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conditional control of fluorescent protein degradation by an auxin-dependent nanobody

Open access
Daniel, Katrin, Icha, Jaroslav, Horenburg, Cindy, Müller, Doris, Norden, Caren, Mansfeld, Jörg·2018·Nature Communications
DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-05855-5PMC PMC6098157

Published version of a preprint

Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The conditional and reversible depletion of proteins by auxin-mediated degradation is a powerful tool to investigate protein functions in cells and whole organisms. However, its wider applications require fusing the auxin-inducible degron (AID) to individual target proteins. Thus, establishing the auxin system for multiple proteins can be challenging. Another approach for directed protein degradation are anti-GFP nanobodies, which can be applied to GFP stock collections that are readily available in different experimental models. Here, we combine the advantages of auxin and nanobody-based degradation technologies creating an AID-nanobody to degrade GFP-tagged proteins at different cellular structures in a conditional and reversible manner in human cells. We demonstrate efficient and reversible inactivation of the anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) and thus provide new means to study the functions of this essential ubiquitin E3 ligase. Further, we establish auxin degradation in a vertebrate model organism by employing AID-nanobodies in zebrafish.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-018-05855-5

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Auxin-dependent degradation of GFP-tagged proteins by an anti-GFP nanobody. Schematic illustration of AID-nanobody degradation. GFP-tagged proteins are recognized by an AID-nanobody fusion. Addition of auxin triggers recruitment of the SCFTIR1 ubiquitin E3 ligase. Ubiquitylation of the GFP fusion protein occurs at lysine residues present in GFP and/or the target protein leading to proteasomal degradation. AID, auxin-inducible degron; Cul1, Cullin-1; Rbx1, RING-box protein 1; Skp1, S-phase kinase-associated protein 1; TIR1, transport inhibitor response 1; vhh-GFP4, anti-GFP nanobody
Fig. 1 Auxin-dependent degradation of GFP-tagged proteins by an anti-GFP nanobody. Schematic illustration of AID-nanobody degradation. GFP-tagged proteins are recognized by an AID-nanobody fusion. Addition of auxin triggers recruitment of the SCFTIR1 ubiquitin E3 ligase. Ubiquitylation of the GFP fusion protein occurs at lysine residues present in GFP and/or the target protein leading to proteasomal degradation. AID, auxin-inducible degron; Cul1, Cullin-1; Rbx1, RING-box protein 1; Skp1, S-phase kinase-associated protein 1; TIR1, transport inhibitor response 1; vhh-GFP4, anti-GFP nanobodyCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Kinetics of Venus degradation by mAID-nanobodies. a Time-lapse images and degradation kinetics of Venus targeted by the mAID-nanobody or b of Venus-AID after the addition of 0.5 mM auxin. Scale bar: 10 μm. Quantifications show the mean ± s.d. (n = 5, -auxin, +auxin +MG132; n = 10, +auxin). c Western blot analyses of cells treated as in a and b for the indicated time with 0.5 mM auxin or auxin together with 10 μM proteasome inhibitor MG132. d Titration of tetracycline-inducible expression of mAID-nanobodies and the effect on the degradation kinetics of Venus in the presence of 0.5 mM auxin. Note, the 100 pg curve is masked by the 20 and 0 pg curves. Quantifications show non-linear fit (one-phase decay) of (n = 6, 0 tetracyline ± auxin; n = 3, remaining concentrations). Note, images of –auxin, +auxin and 10 μM MG132-treated cells, degradation of Venus by deGradFP, and Western blot detection of mAID-nanobody expression during the titration are shown in Supplementary Figure 2
Fig. 2 Kinetics of Venus degradation by mAID-nanobodies. a Time-lapse images and degradation kinetics of Venus targeted by the mAID-nanobody or b of Venus-AID after the addition of 0.5 mM auxin. Scale bar: 10 μm. Quantifications show the mean ± s.d. (n = 5, -auxin, +auxin +MG132; n = 10, +auxin). c Western blot analyses of cells treated as in a and b for the indicated time with 0.5 mM auxin or auxin together with 10 μM proteasome inhibitor MG132. d Titration of tetracycline-inducible expression of mAID-nanobodies and the effect on the degradation kinetics of Venus in the presence of 0.5 mM auxin. Note, the 100 pg curve is masked by the 20 and 0 pg curves. Quantifications show non-linear fit (one-phase decay) of (n = 6, 0 tetracyline ± auxin; n = 3, remaining concentrations). Note, images of –auxin, +auxin and 10 μM MG132-treated cells, degradation of Venus by deGradFP, and Western blot detection of mAID-nanobody expression during the titration are shown in Supplementary Figure 2CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Conditional and reversible depletion of GFP-fusion proteins localized to distinct cellular compartments and structures by mAID-nanobodies. a Time-lapse images showing the degradation and recovery of (a) nuclear lamina-associated Venus-LMNA and b nuclear and cytoplasmic CCND1-Venus in Hela cell lines expressing tetracycline-inducible mAID-nanobody or c the centromere-associated Inner centromere protein (INCENP-GFP) after transient transfection of mAID-nanobody and nuclear mCherry expressed from the same mRNA (mCherry + mAID-VHH, see Methods). a–c Degradation and recovery were induced by the addition or removal of 0.5 mM auxin for the indicated time. Scale bar: 10 μm. d Single cell degradation kinetics of Venus-LMNA, CCND1-Venus and INCENP-GFP from the experiments shown in a–c. Open blue circles indicate degradation INCENP-GFP cells that reach a plateau at ~50% of the initial fluorescence. Quantifications show the mean ± s.d. Venus-LMNA and CCND1-Venus (n = 40, –auxin; n = 40, +auxin). INCENP-GFP (n = 14, –auxin; n = 29, +auxin (plateau); n = 40, +auxin)
Fig. 3 Conditional and reversible depletion of GFP-fusion proteins localized to distinct cellular compartments and structures by mAID-nanobodies. a Time-lapse images showing the degradation and recovery of (a) nuclear lamina-associated Venus-LMNA and b nuclear and cytoplasmic CCND1-Venus in Hela cell lines expressing tetracycline-inducible mAID-nanobody or c the centromere-associated Inner centromere protein (INCENP-GFP) after transient transfection of mAID-nanobody and nuclear mCherry expressed from the same mRNA (mCherry + mAID-VHH, see Methods). a–c Degradation and recovery were induced by the addition or removal of 0.5 mM auxin for the indicated time. Scale bar: 10 μm. d Single cell degradation kinetics of Venus-LMNA, CCND1-Venus and INCENP-GFP from the experiments shown in a–c. Open blue circles indicate degradation INCENP-GFP cells that reach a plateau at ~50% of the initial fluorescence. Quantifications show the mean ± s.d. Venus-LMNA and CCND1-Venus (n = 40, –auxin; n = 40, +auxin). INCENP-GFP (n = 14, –auxin; n = 29, +auxin (plateau); n = 40, +auxin)CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 mAID-nanobodies allow the rapid but reversible inactivation of the APC/C. a Degradation of endogenously tagged Venus-ANAPC4 after the addition of 0.5 mM auxin. Scale bar: 10 μm. ANAPC4, APC/C subunit 4. See also Supplementary Figure 3 for characterization of the ANAPC4 knock-in. b Quantification of Venus-ANAPC4 fluorescence from time-lapse data in a showing the kinetics of Venus-ANAPC4 degradation in the nucleus and cytoplasm represented as the mean ± s.d. (n = 6, all conditions). c Time-lapse images and quantification of Venus-ANAPC4 cells arresting in mitosis in the presence of 0.5 mM auxin. Data represent the mean ± s.d. (n = 12, −auxin and +auxin). Scale bar: 10 μm. d Western blot analysis of cells treated with 0.5 mM auxin for the indicated time. Accumulation of cyclins CCNA2 and CCNB1 are indicative of a mitotic arrest. TIR1 serves as a loading control. e Time-lapse images of Venus-ANAPC4 cells treated for 3 h with 0.5 mM auxin followed by auxin removal and 26 h of recovery. Note, Venus-ANAPC4 recovery after 7.3 h is sufficient to allow mitotic progression. Scale bar: 10 μm. f Quantification of Venus-ANAPC4 recovery from cells treated as in e represented as mean ± s.d. (n = 18, −auxin; n = 39, +auxin). Scale bar: 10 μm. g Western blot analysis of cells treated as in e, TIR1 serves as a loading control
Fig. 4 mAID-nanobodies allow the rapid but reversible inactivation of the APC/C. a Degradation of endogenously tagged Venus-ANAPC4 after the addition of 0.5 mM auxin. Scale bar: 10 μm. ANAPC4, APC/C subunit 4. See also Supplementary Figure 3 for characterization of the ANAPC4 knock-in. b Quantification of Venus-ANAPC4 fluorescence from time-lapse data in a showing the kinetics of Venus-ANAPC4 degradation in the nucleus and cytoplasm represented as the mean ± s.d. (n = 6, all conditions). c Time-lapse images and quantification of Venus-ANAPC4 cells arresting in mitosis in the presence of 0.5 mM auxin. Data represent the mean ± s.d. (n = 12, −auxin and +auxin). Scale bar: 10 μm. d Western blot analysis of cells treated with 0.5 mM auxin for the indicated time. Accumulation of cyclins CCNA2 and CCNB1 are indicative of a mitotic arrest. TIR1 serves as a loading control. e Time-lapse images of Venus-ANAPC4 cells treated for 3 h with 0.5 mM auxin followed by auxin removal and 26 h of recovery. Note, Venus-ANAPC4 recovery after 7.3 h is sufficient to allow mitotic progression. Scale bar: 10 μm. f Quantification of Venus-ANAPC4 recovery from cells treated as in e represented as mean ± s.d. (n = 18, −auxin; n = 39, +auxin). Scale bar: 10 μm. g Western blot analysis of cells treated as in e, TIR1 serves as a loading controlCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 5 Degradation of endogenous ANAPC4 by mAID-nanobodies in comparison with AID and deGradFP systems. a Time-lapse images showing the degradation of endogenously tagged Venus-ANAPC4 and mAID-Venus-ANAPC4, respectively, in response to the addition of 0.5 mM auxin for mAID-nanobodies and AID-Venus-ANAPC4 or 1 μg/ml tetracycline to induce deGradFP expression. Cells that efficiently degraded Venus-ANAPC4 during 24 h of deGradFP expression are high-lighted by a dotted line. b Degradation kinetics of the time-lapse data shown in a represented as the mean ± s.d. for mAID-vhhGFP (n = 9, −auxin; n = 16, +auxin), mAID-Venus-ANAPC4 (n = 12, −auxin; n = 20, +auxin), and deGradFP (n = 8, −tetracycline; n = 11 +tetracycline). c Western blot analysis of cells treated as in a for the indicated time. Increased levels of CCNB1 are indicative of a mitotic arrest and thus functional inactivation of the APC/C. See also Supplementary Figure 4 for characterization of the mAID-Venus-ANAPC4 knock-in, the effect of prolonged expression of deGradFP on Venus-ANAPC4 and CCNB1 levels, and Venus-ANAPC4 fluorescence in response to expressing deGradFP and deGradFP∆Fbox
Fig. 5 Degradation of endogenous ANAPC4 by mAID-nanobodies in comparison with AID and deGradFP systems. a Time-lapse images showing the degradation of endogenously tagged Venus-ANAPC4 and mAID-Venus-ANAPC4, respectively, in response to the addition of 0.5 mM auxin for mAID-nanobodies and AID-Venus-ANAPC4 or 1 μg/ml tetracycline to induce deGradFP expression. Cells that efficiently degraded Venus-ANAPC4 during 24 h of deGradFP expression are high-lighted by a dotted line. b Degradation kinetics of the time-lapse data shown in a represented as the mean ± s.d. for mAID-vhhGFP (n = 9, −auxin; n = 16, +auxin), mAID-Venus-ANAPC4 (n = 12, −auxin; n = 20, +auxin), and deGradFP (n = 8, −tetracycline; n = 11 +tetracycline). c Western blot analysis of cells treated as in a for the indicated time. Increased levels of CCNB1 are indicative of a mitotic arrest and thus functional inactivation of the APC/C. See also Supplementary Figure 4 for characterization of the mAID-Venus-ANAPC4 knock-in, the effect of prolonged expression of deGradFP on Venus-ANAPC4 and CCNB1 levels, and Venus-ANAPC4 fluorescence in response to expressing deGradFP and deGradFP∆FboxCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 6 Auxin-dependent degradation of GFP-tagged proteins by mAID-nanobodies in zebrafish. a Eye of a 24 hpf zebrafish embryo in Tg(bactin:GFP-PCNA) mosaically injected with RNAs of TIR1, mAID-nanobody and H2B-RFP RNA to visualize affected cells. The dashed box shows the area displayed in b. RNE, retinal neuroepithelium. Scale bar: 20 μm. b GFP-PCNA degradation in the presence of IAA. Dashed line: Nuclei of cells expressing the degradation system. Scale bar: 10 μm. c Comparison of GFP-PCNA degradation at 22 hpf in response to IAA and NAA treatment. 1 represents no degradation and 0 represents complete degradation. Bars represent median, −auxin control (n = 11, 110 cells), IAA (n = 11, 108 cells), NAA (n = 11, 108 cells). Significance according to a two-tailed Mann–Whitney test. d Time-lapse imaging of GFP-PCNA degradation in response to NAA in cells without (H2B-RFP negative, left panel) and with degradation system (H2B-RFP positive, right panel). Scale bar: 5 μm. e Degradation of GFP-fusion proteins localized to different cellular structures. Nuclear membrane-localized Lamina-associated polypeptide 2 Tg(bactin:GFP-LAP2b), filamentous actin binding Utrophin fragment Tg(bactin:GFP-Utrophin) and actomyosin-associated non-muscle myosin II light chain Tg(bactin:Myl12.1-GFP). Cells containing the degradation system were visualized by cytoplasmic H2B-RFP or cytoplasmic mKate2 RNA co-injection. Scale bar: 10 μm. f Comparison of GFP-LAP2b degradation in response to IAA and NAA treatment as in c. Bars represent median, −auxin control (n = 11, 110 cells), IAA (n = 5, 50 cells), NAA (n = 11, 111 cells). Significance according to a two-tailed Mann–Whitney test. g Depletion of GFP from mitochondria, Tg(Eef1a1:mls-GFP). Cells containing the degradation system show cytoplasmic mKate2 signal. GFP intensity profile along dashed line is plotted, magenta corresponds to the degradation area. Scale bar: 10 μm. All data shown in this figure are representative examples from at least two independent biological experiments
Fig. 6 Auxin-dependent degradation of GFP-tagged proteins by mAID-nanobodies in zebrafish. a Eye of a 24 hpf zebrafish embryo in Tg(bactin:GFP-PCNA) mosaically injected with RNAs of TIR1, mAID-nanobody and H2B-RFP RNA to visualize affected cells. The dashed box shows the area displayed in b. RNE, retinal neuroepithelium. Scale bar: 20 μm. b GFP-PCNA degradation in the presence of IAA. Dashed line: Nuclei of cells expressing the degradation system. Scale bar: 10 μm. c Comparison of GFP-PCNA degradation at 22 hpf in response to IAA and NAA treatment. 1 represents no degradation and 0 represents complete degradation. Bars represent median, −auxin control (n = 11, 110 cells), IAA (n = 11, 108 cells), NAA (n = 11, 108 cells). Significance according to a two-tailed Mann–Whitney test. d Time-lapse imaging of GFP-PCNA degradation in response to NAA in cells without (H2B-RFP negative, left panel) and with degradation system (H2B-RFP positive, right panel). Scale bar: 5 μm. e Degradation of GFP-fusion proteins localized to different cellular structures. Nuclear membrane-localized Lamina-associated polypeptide 2 Tg(bactin:GFP-LAP2b), filamentous actin binding Utrophin fragment Tg(bactin:GFP-Utrophin) and actomyosin-associated non-muscle myosin II light chain Tg(bactin:Myl12.1-GFP). Cells containing the degradation system were visualized by cytoplasmic H2B-RFP or cytoplasmic mKate2 RNA co-injection. Scale bar: 10 μm. f Comparison of GFP-LAP2b degradation in response to IAA and NAA treatment as in c. Bars represent median, −auxin control (n = 11, 110 cells), IAA (n = 5, 50 cells), NAA (n = 11, 111 cells). Significance according to a two-tailed Mann–Whitney test. g Depletion of GFP from mitochondria, Tg(Eef1a1:mls-GFP). Cells containing the degradation system show cytoplasmic mKate2 signal. GFP intensity profile along dashed line is plotted, magenta corresponds to the degradation area. Scale bar: 10 μm. All data shown in this figure are representative examples from at least two independent biological experimentsCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 113

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Daniel, K., Icha, J., Horenburg, C., Müller, D., Norden, C., & Mansfeld, J.
Affiliations
  • Biotechnologisches Zentrum (DE)
  • University of Turku (FI)
  • Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Norden, Caren
  • Mansfeld, Jörg
ORCID
Venue
Nature Communications
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2018-08-17
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
3297-3297
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1038/s41467-018-05855-5
PMC
PMC6098157
OpenAlex
W2951829327
Cited by
113
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 4
FWCI
4.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UTUPub (University of Turku) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (MA 5831/1-1)
  • EC | European Research Council (680042)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
Keywords
auxin-inducible degron, nanobodies, anti-GFP nanobody, anaphase-promoting complex, E3 ubiquitin ligase, zebrafish, human cells
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Compartmentation, HeLa Cells, Humans, Indoleacetic Acids, Kinetics, Lysine, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Zebrafish, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Proteolysis, Single-Domain Antibodies, Anaphase-Promoting Complex-Cyclosome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review