Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 390

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Macrophages directly contribute collagen to scar formation during zebrafish heart regeneration and mouse heart repair

Open access
Simões, Filipa C., Cahill, Thomas J., Kenyon, Amy, Gavriouchkina, Daria, Vieira, Joaquim M., Sun, Xin, Pezzolla, Daniela, Ravaud, Christophe, Masmanian, Eva, Weinberger, Michael, Mayes, Sarah, Lemieux, Madeleine E., Barnette, Damien N., Gunadasa-Rohling, Mala, Williams, Ruth M., Greaves, David R., Trinh, Le A., Fraser, Scott E., Dallas, Sarah L., Choudhury, Robin P., Sauka-Spengler, Tatjana, Riley, Paul R.·2020·Nature Communications

Abstract

Canonical roles for macrophages in mediating the fibrotic response after a heart attack include extracellular matrix turnover and activation of cardiac fibroblasts to initiate collagen deposition. Here we reveal that macrophages directly contribute collagen to the forming post-injury scar. Unbiased transcriptomics shows an upregulation of collagens in both zebrafish and mouse macrophages following heart injury. Adoptive transfer of macrophages, from either collagen-tagged zebrafish or adult mouse GFP tpz -collagen donors, enhances scar formation via cell autonomous production of collagen. In zebrafish, the majority of tagged collagen localises proximal to the injury, within the overlying epicardial region, suggesting a possible distinction between macrophage-deposited collagen and that predominantly laid-down by myofibroblasts. Macrophage-specific targeting of col4a3bpa and cognate col4a1 in zebrafish significantly reduces scarring in cryoinjured hosts. Our findings contrast with the current model of scarring, whereby collagen deposition is exclusively attributed to myofibroblasts, and implicate macrophages as direct contributors to fibrosis during heart repair.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-019-14263-2

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 390

Metadata

Authors
Simões, F. C., Cahill, T. J., Kenyon, A., Gavriouchkina, D., Vieira, J. M., Sun, X., Pezzolla, D., Ravaud, C., Masmanian, E., Weinberger, M., Mayes, S., Lemieux, M. E., Barnette, D. N., Gunadasa-Rohling, M., Williams, R. M., Greaves, D. R., Trinh, L. A., Fraser, S. E., Dallas, S. L., Choudhury, R. P., Sauka-Spengler, T., & Riley, P. R.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2020-01-30
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
600-600
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2997366069
Cited by
390
References
13
FWCI
14.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Macrophages directly contribute collagen to scar formation during zebrafish heart regeneration and mouse heart repair. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41467-019-14263-2
The paper
Simões, F. C., Cahill, T. J., Kenyon, A., Gavriouchkina, D., Vieira, J. M., Sun, X., Pezzolla, D., Ravaud, C., Masmanian, E., Weinberger, M., Mayes, S., Lemieux, M. E., Barnette, D. N., Gunadasa-Rohling, M., Williams, R. M., Greaves, D. R., Trinh, L. A., Fraser, S. E., Dallas, S. L., . . . Riley, P. R. (2020). Macrophages directly contribute collagen to scar formation during zebrafish heart regeneration and mouse heart repair. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14263-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.