Cited by 97

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A fluoride-responsive genetic circuit enables in vivo biofluorination in engineered Pseudomonas putida

Calero, Patricia, Volke, Daniel C., Lowe, Phillip T., Gotfredsen, Charlotte H., O’Hagan, David, Nikel, Pablo I.·2020·Nature Communications

Abstract

Fluorine is a key element in the synthesis of molecules broadly used in medicine, agriculture and materials. Addition of fluorine to organic structures represents a unique strategy for tuning molecular properties, yet this atom is rarely found in Nature and approaches to integrate fluorometabolites into the biochemistry of living cells are scarce. In this work, synthetic gene circuits for organofluorine biosynthesis are implemented in the platform bacterium Pseudomonas putida . By harnessing fluoride-responsive riboswitches and the orthogonal T7 RNA polymerase, biochemical reactions needed for in vivo biofluorination are wired to the presence of fluoride (i.e. circumventing the need of feeding expensive additives). Biosynthesis of fluoronucleotides and fluorosugars in engineered P . putida is demonstrated with mineral fluoride both as only fluorine source (i.e. substrate of the pathway) and as inducer of the synthetic circuit. This approach expands the chemical landscape of cell factories by providing alternative biosynthetic strategies towards fluorinated building-blocks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-020-18813-x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. Walker, M. C. & Chang, M. C. Y. Natural and engineered biosynthesis of fluorinated natural products. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 6527–6536 (2014). · DOI
  2. O’Hagan, D. & Deng, H. Enzymatic fluorination and biotechnological developments of the fluorinase. Chem. Rev. 115, 634–649 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Braun, M. & Eicher, J. In Modern synthesis and reactivity of fluorinated compounds. (eds. Groult, H. et al.) 7–25 (Elsevier, London, 2017). · DOI
  4. Zhou, Y. et al. Next generation of fluorine-containing pharmaceuticals, compounds currently in phase II-III clinical trials of major pharmaceutical companies: New structural trends and therapeutic areas. Chem. Rev. 116, 422–518 (2016). · DOI
  5. Yerien, D. E., Bonesi, S. & Postigo, A. Fluorination methods in drug discovery. Org. Biomol. Chem. 14, 8398–8427 (2016). · DOI
  6. Martinelli, L. & Nikel, P. I. Breaking the state-of-the-art in the chemical industry with new-to-Nature products via synthetic microbiology. Microb. Biotechnol. 12, 187–190 (2019). · DOI
  7. O’Hagan, D. Understanding organofluorine chemistry. An introduction to the C–F bond. Chem. Soc. Rev. 37, 308–319 (2008). · DOI
  8. Chan, K. K. & O’Hagan, D. The rare fluorinated natural products and biotechnological prospects for fluorine enzymology. Methods Enzymol. 516, 219–235 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  9. Feng, X., Bello, D., Lowe, P. T., Clark, J. & O’Hagan, D. Two 3′-O-β-glucosylated nucleoside fluorometabolites related to nucleocidin in Streptomyces calvus. Chem. Sci. 10, 9501–9505 (2019). · DOI
  10. Wu, L., Maglangit, F. & Deng, H. Fluorine biocatalysis. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 55, 119–126 (2020). · DOI
  11. Dong, C. et al. Crystal structure and mechanism of a bacterial fluorinating enzyme. Nature 427, 561–565 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  12. O’Hagan, D., Schaffrath, C., Cobb, S. L., Hamilton, J. T. & Murphy, C. D. Biochemistry: biosynthesis of an organofluorine molecule. Nature 416, 279 (2002). · DOI
  13. Zhao, C. et al. Insights into fluorometabolite biosynthesis in Streptomyces cattleya DSM46488 through genome sequence and knockout mutants. Bioorg. Chem. 44, 1–7 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  14. Zhu, X., Robinson, D. A., McEwan, A. R., O’Hagan, D. & Naismith, J. H. Mechanism of enzymatic fluorination in Streptomyces cattleya. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 14597–14604 (2007). · DOI
  15. Sun, H. et al. Directed evolution of a fluorinase for improved fluorination efficiency with a non-native substrate. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 14277–14280 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  16. Eustáquio, A. S., O’Hagan, D. & Moore, B. S. Engineering fluorometabolite production: fluorinase expression in Salinispora tropica yields fluorosalinosporamide. J. Nat. Prod. 73, 378–382 (2010). · DOI
  17. Markakis, K. et al. An engineered E. coli strain for direct in vivo fluorination. ChemBioChem 21, 1856–1860 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Walker, M. C. et al. Expanding the fluorine chemistry of living systems using engineered polyketide synthase pathways. Science 341, 1089–1094 (2013). · DOI
  19. Ad, O., Thuronyi, B. W. & Chang, M. C. Elucidating the mechanism of fluorinated extender unit loading for improved production of fluorine-containing polyketides. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E660–E668 (2017). · DOI
  20. Thuronyi, B. W., Privalsky, T. M. & Chang, M. C. Y. Engineered fluorine metabolism and fluoropolymer production in living cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 13637–13640 (2017). · DOI
  21. Nikel, P. I., Chavarría, M., Danchin, A. & de Lorenzo, V. From dirt to industrial applications: Pseudomonas putida as a synthetic biology chassis for hosting harsh biochemical reactions. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 34, 20–29 (2016). · DOI
  22. Nikel, P. I. & de Lorenzo, V. Pseudomonas putida as a functional chassis for industrial biocatalysis: From native biochemistry to trans-metabolism. Metab. Eng. 50, 142–155 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  23. Nikel, P. I., Martínez-García, E. & de Lorenzo, V. Biotechnological domestication of pseudomonads using synthetic biology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12, 368–379 (2014). · DOI
  24. Volke, D. C., Calero, P. & Nikel, P. I. Pseudomonas putida. Trends Microbiol 28, 512–513 (2020). · DOI
  25. Fernández-Cabezón, L., Cros, A. & Nikel, P. I. Evolutionary approaches for engineering industrially-relevant phenotypes in bacterial cell factories. Biotechnol. J. 14, 1800439 (2019). · DOI
  26. Apura, P., Domingues, S., Viegas, S. C. & Arraiano, C. M. Reprogramming bacteria with RNA regulators. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 47, 1279–1289 (2019). · DOI
  27. Leistra, A. N., Curtis, N. C. & Contreras, L. M. Regulatory non-coding sRNAs in bacterial metabolic pathway engineering. Metab. Eng. 52, 190–214 (2019). · DOI
  28. Crum, M., Ram-Mohan, N. & Meyer, M. M. Regulatory context drives conservation of glycine riboswitch aptamers. PLoS Comput. Biol. 15, e1007564 (2019). · DOI
  29. Baker, J. L. et al. Widespread genetic switches and toxicity resistance proteins for fluoride. Science 335, 233–235 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  30. Chawla, M., Credendino, R., Poater, A., Oliva, R. & Cavallo, L. Structural stability, acidity, and halide selectivity of the fluoride riboswitch recognition site. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 299–306 (2015). · DOI
  31. Belda, E. et al. The revisited genome of Pseudomonas putida KT2440 enlightens its value as a robust metabolic chassis. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 3403–3424 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  32. Stockbridge, R. B. et al. Fluoride resistance and transport by riboswitch-controlled CLC antiporters. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 15289–15294 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  33. Schaffrath, C., Deng, H. & O’Hagan, D. Isolation and characterisation of 5′-fluorodeoxyadenosine synthase, a fluorination enzyme from Streptomyces cattleya. FEBS Lett. 547, 111–114 (2003). · DOI
  34. Deng, H. et al. Identification of fluorinases from Streptomyces sp MA37, Nocardia brasiliensis, and Actinoplanes sp N902-109 by genome mining. ChemBioChem 15, 364–368 (2014). · DOI
  35. Ma, L. et al. Biological fluorination from the sea: discovery of a SAM-dependent nucleophilic fluorinating enzyme from the marine-derived bacterium Streptomyces xinghaiensis NRRL B24674. RSC Adv. 6, 27047–27051 (2016). · DOI
  36. Volke, D. C., Turlin, J., Mol, V. & Nikel, P. I. Physical decoupling of XylS/Pm regulatory elements and conditional proteolysis enable precise control of gene expression in Pseudomonas putida. Microb. Biotechnol. 13, 222–232 (2020). · DOI
  37. Volke, D. C., Friis, L., Wirth, N. T., Turlin, J. & Nikel, P. I. Synthetic control of plasmid replication enables target- and self-curing of vectors and expedites genome engineering of Pseudomonas putida. Metab. Eng. Commun. 10, e00126 (2020). · DOI
  38. Neugebauer, M. E. et al. A family of radical halogenases for the engineering of amino-acid-based products. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15, 1009–1016 (2019). · DOI
  39. Fejzagic, A. V., Gebauer, J., Huwa, N. & Classen, T. Halogenating enzymes for active agent synthesis: first steps are done and many have to follow. Molecules 24, e4008 (2019). · DOI
  40. Latham, J., Brandenburger, E., Shepherd, S. A., Menon, B. R. K. & Micklefield, J. Development of halogenase enzymes for use in synthesis. Chem. Rev. 118, 232–269 (2018). · DOI
  41. Sánchez-Pascuala, A., de Lorenzo, V. & Nikel, P. I. Refactoring the Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas pathway as a whole of portable GlucoBricks for implantation of glycolytic modules in Gram-negative bacteria. ACS Synth. Biol. 6, 793–805 (2017). · DOI
  42. Silva-Rocha, R. et al. The Standard European Vector Architecture (SEVA): a coherent platform for the analysis and deployment of complex prokaryotic phenotypes. Nucleic Acids Res 41, D666–D675 (2013). · DOI
  43. Bennett, B. D. et al. Absolute metabolite concentrations and implied enzyme active site occupancy in Escherichia coli. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5, 593–599 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  44. Cress, B. F. et al. CRISPRi-mediated metabolic engineering of E. coli for O-methylated anthocyanin production. Microb. Cell Fact. 16, 10 (2017). · DOI
  45. Thavarajah, W. et al. Point-of-use detection of environmental fluoride via a cell-free riboswitch-based biosensor. ACS Synth. Biol. 9, 10–18 (2020). · DOI
  46. Reid, K. A., Bowden, R. D., Dasaradhi, L., Amin, M. R. & Harper, D. B. Biosynthesis of fluorinated secondary metabolites by Streptomyces cattleya. Microbiology 141, 1385–1393 (1995). · DOI · Paper page
  47. Nieto-Domínguez, M. & Nikel, P. I. Intersecting xenobiology and neo‐metabolism to bring novel chemistries to life. ChemBioChem, 21, 2551–2571 (2020). · DOI
  48. Agostini, F. et al. Biocatalysis with unnatural amino acids: Enzymology meets xenobiology. Angew. Chem. Intern. Ed. 56, 9680–9703 (2017). · DOI
  49. Merkel, L., Schauer, M., Antranikian, G. & Budisa, N. Parallel incorporation of different fluorinated amino acids: on the way to “Teflon” proteins. ChemBioChem 11, 1505–1507 (2010). · DOI
  50. Nikel, P. I. & de Lorenzo, V. Engineering an anaerobic metabolic regime in Pseudomonas putida KT2440 for the anoxic biodegradation of 1,3-dichloroprop-1-ene. Metab. Eng. 15, 98–112 (2013). · DOI
  51. Choi, K. H., Kumar, A. & Schweizer, H. P. A 10-min method for preparation of highly electrocompetent Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells: application for DNA fragment transfer between chromosomes and plasmid transformation. J. Microbiol. Methods 64, 391–397 (2006). · DOI
  52. Nour-Eldin, H. H., Geu-Flores, F. & Halkier, B. A. USER cloning and USER fusion: The ideal cloning techniques for small and big laboratories. Methods Mol. Biol. 643, 185–200 (2010). · DOI
  53. Choi, K. H. & Schweizer, H. P. Mini-Tn7 insertion in bacteria with single attTn7 sites: example Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Nat. Protoc. 1, 153–161 (2006). · DOI
  54. Wirth, N. T., Kozaeva, E. & Nikel, P. I. Accelerated genome engineering of Pseudomonas putida by I-SceI―mediated recombination and CRISPR-Cas9 counterselection. Microb. Biotechnol. 13, 233–249 (2020). · DOI
  55. The UniProt consortium. UniProt: a hub for protein information. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D204–D212 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  56. Larkin, M. A. et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23, 2947–2948 (2007). · DOI
  57. Lefort, V., Longueville, J. E. & Gascuel, O. SMS: smart model selection in PhyML. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 2422–2424 (2017). · DOI
  58. Bradford, M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72, 248–254 (1976). · DOI · Paper page
  59. Sánchez-Pascuala, A., Fernández-Cabezón, L., de Lorenzo, V. & Nikel, P. I. Functional implementation of a linear glycolysis for sugar catabolism in Pseudomonas putida. Metab. Eng. 54, 200–211 (2019). · DOI
  60. Nikel, P. I., Chavarría, M., Fuhrer, T., Sauer, U. & de Lorenzo, V. Pseudomonas putida KT2440 strain metabolizes glucose through a cycle formed by enzymes of the Entner-Doudoroff, Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas, and pentose phosphate pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 25920–25932 (2015). · DOI
  61. Stiefel, P., Schmidt-Emrich, S., Maniura-Weber, K. & Ren, Q. Critical aspects of using bacterial cell viability assays with the fluorophores SYTO9 and propidium iodide. BMC Microbiol. 15, 36 (2015). · DOI
  62. Ashton, T. D. & Scammells, P. J. An improved synthesis of 5′-fluoro-5′-deoxyadenosines. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15, 3361–3363 (2005). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Calero, P., Volke, D. C., Lowe, P. T., Gotfredsen, C. H., O’Hagan, D., & Nikel, P. I.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2020-10-07
Volume
11
Issue
1
ISSN
2041-1723
Cited by
97
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review