Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 317

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rational design of a microbial consortium of mucosal sugar utilizers reduces Clostridiodes difficile colonization

Open access
Pereira, Fátima C., Wasmund, Kenneth, Cobankovic, Iva, Jehmlich, Nico, Herbold, Craig W., Lee, Kang Soo, Sziranyi, Barbara, Vesely, Cornelia, Decker, Thomas, Stocker, Roman, Warth, Benedikt, von Bergen, Martin, Wagner, Michael, Berry, David·2020·Nature Communications

Abstract

Many intestinal pathogens, including Clostridioides difficile, use mucus-derived sugars as crucial nutrients in the gut. Commensals that compete with pathogens for such nutrients are therefore ecological gatekeepers in healthy guts, and are attractive candidates for therapeutic interventions. Nevertheless, there is a poor understanding of which commensals use mucin-derived sugars in situ as well as their potential to impede pathogen colonization. Here, we identify mouse gut commensals that utilize mucus-derived monosaccharides within complex communities using single-cell stable isotope probing, Raman-activated cell sorting and mini-metagenomics. Sequencing of cell-sorted fractions reveals members of the underexplored family Muribaculaceae as major mucin monosaccharide foragers, followed by members of Lachnospiraceae, Rikenellaceae, and Bacteroidaceae families. Using this information, we assembled a five-member consortium of sialic acid and N-acetylglucosamine utilizers that impedes C. difficile’s access to these mucosal sugars and impairs pathogen colonization in antibiotic-treated mice. Our findings underscore the value of targeted approaches to identify organisms utilizing key nutrients and to rationally design effective probiotic mixtures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-020-18928-1

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 80 references

Cited by

See all 317

Metadata

Authors
Pereira, F. C., Wasmund, K., Cobankovic, I., Jehmlich, N., Herbold, C. W., Lee, K. S., Sziranyi, B., Vesely, C., Decker, T., Stocker, R., Warth, B., von Bergen, M., Wagner, M., & Berry, D.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2020-10-09
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
5104-5104
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3092276385
Cited by
317
References
80
FWCI
10.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rational design of a microbial consortium of mucosal sugar utilizers reduces Clostridiodes difficile colonization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41467-020-18928-1
The paper
Pereira, F. C., Wasmund, K., Cobankovic, I., Jehmlich, N., Herbold, C. W., Lee, K. S., Sziranyi, B., Vesely, C., Decker, T., Stocker, R., Warth, B., von Bergen, M., Wagner, M., & Berry, D. (2020). Rational design of a microbial consortium of mucosal sugar utilizers reduces Clostridiodes difficile colonization. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18928-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.