The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of carbon dioxide removal technologies on deep decarbonization of the electric power sector
Open accessAbstract
Carbon dioxide removal technologies, such as bioenergy with carbon capture and direct air capture, are valuable for stringent climate targets. Previous work has examined implications of carbon removal, primarily bioenergy-based technologies using integrated assessment models, but not investigated the effects of a portfolio of removal options on power systems in detail. Here, we explore impacts of carbon removal technologies on electric sector investments, costs, and emissions using a detailed capacity planning and dispatch model with hourly resolution. We show that adding carbon removal to a mix of low-carbon generation technologies lowers the costs of deep decarbonization. Changes to system costs and investments from including carbon removal are larger as policy ambition increases, reducing the dependence on technologies like advanced nuclear and long-duration storage. Bioenergy with carbon capture is selected for net-zero electric sector emissions targets, but direct air capture deployment increases as biomass supply costs rise.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Net-zero emissions energy systems
Davis, S. J., Lewis, N. S., Shaner, M., Aggarwal, S., Arent, D., Azevedo, I. L., Benson, S. M., Bradley, T., Brouwer, J., Chiang, Y.-M., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aas9793 · Cited by 2,391
A Process for Capturing CO2 from the Atmosphere
Keith, D. W., Holmes, G., St. Angelo, D., & Heidel, K. (2018) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.006 · Cited by 1,910
Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions
Smith, P., Davis, S. J., Creutzig, F., Fuss, S., Minx, J., Gabrielle, B., Kato, E., Jackson, R. B., Cowie, A., Kriegler, E., et al. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2870 · Cited by 1,440
Negative emissions—Part 1: Research landscape and synthesis
Minx, J. C., Lamb, W. F., Callaghan, M. W., Fuss, S., Hilaire, J., Creutzig, F., Amann, T., Beringer, T., de Oliveira Garcia, W., Hartmann, J., et al. (2018) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9b · Cited by 865
The Role of Firm Low-Carbon Electricity Resources in Deep Decarbonization of Power Generation
Sepulveda, N. A., Jenkins, J. D., de Sisternes, F. J., & Lester, R. K. (2018) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2018.08.006 · Cited by 592
An Overview of the Status and Challenges of CO2 Storage in Minerals and Geological Formations
Kelemen, P., Benson, S. M., Pilorgé, H., Psarras, P., & Wilcox, J. (2019) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2019.00009 · Cited by 587
The mutual dependence of negative emission technologies and energy systems
Creutzig, F., Breyer, C., Hilaire, J., Minx, J., Peters, G. P., & Socolow, R. (2019) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c8ee03682a · Cited by 217
Geospatial analysis of near-term potential for carbon-negative bioenergy in the United States
Baik, E., Sanchez, D. L., Turner, P. A., Mach, K. J., Field, C. B., & Benson, S. M. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1720338115 · Cited by 105
Langholtz, M., Busch, I., Kasturi, A., Hilliard, M. R., McFarlane, J., Tsouris, C., Mukherjee, S., Omitaomu, O. A., Kotikot, S. M., Allen-Dumas, M. R., et al. (2020) · Land · doi:10.3390/land9090299 · Cited by 29
Willingness to Pay for a Climate Backstop: Liquid Fuel Producers and Direct CO 2 Air Capture
Nemet, G. F., & Brandt, A. R. (2012) · The Energy Journal · doi:10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol33-no1-3 · Cited by 29
Cited by
United Nations Environment Programme (2023) · United Nations Environment Programme eBooks · doi:10.59117/20.500.11822/43922 · Cited by 322
Carbon dioxide capture with zeotype materials
Fu, D., & Davis, M. E. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d2cs00508e · Cited by 284
Flexibility options in a 100% renewable grid for Australia
Li, M., Keck, F., Lenzen, M., & Ximenes, F. (2024) · Materials Today Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.mtsust.2024.100736 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Bistline, J. E. T., & Blanford, G. J.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2021-06-17
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3732-3732
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3168518811
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 7.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of carbon dioxide removal technologies on deep decarbonization of the electric power sector. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41467-021-23554-6
- The paper
- Bistline, J. E. T., & Blanford, G. J. (2021). Impact of carbon dioxide removal technologies on deep decarbonization of the electric power sector. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23554-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
