Cited by 20Enzyme Structure and FunctionProtein Structure and DynamicsAdvanced X-ray Imaging Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Robust total X-ray scattering workflow to study correlated motion of proteins in crystals

Open access
Meisburger, Steve P., Case, David A., Ando, Nozomi·2023·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The breathing motions of proteins are thought to play a critical role in function. However, current techniques to study key collective motions are limited to spectroscopy and computation. We present a high-resolution experimental approach based on the total scattering from protein crystals at room temperature (TS/RT-MX) that captures both structure and collective motions. To reveal the scattering signal from protein motions, we present a general workflow that enables robust subtraction of lattice disorder. The workflow introduces two methods: GOODVIBES, a detailed and refinable lattice disorder model based on the rigid-body vibrations of a crystalline elastic network; and DISCOBALL, an independent method of validation that estimates the displacement covariance between proteins in the lattice in real space. Here, we demonstrate the robustness of this workflow and further demonstrate how it can be interfaced with MD simulations towards obtaining high-resolution insight into functionally important protein motions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-023-36734-3

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. Nogales, E. The development of cryo-EM into a mainstream structural biology technique. Nat. Methods 13, 24–27 (2016). · DOI
  2. Shoemaker, S. C. & Ando, N. X-rays in the cryo-electron microscopy era: structural biology’s dynamic future. Biochemistry 57, 277–285 (2018). · DOI
  3. Xu, D., Meisburger, S. P. & Ando, N. Correlated motions in structural biology. Biochemistry 60, 2331–2340 (2021). · DOI
  4. Welberry, T. R. & Weber, T. One hundred years of diffuse scattering. Crystallogr. Rev. 22, 2–78 (2016). · DOI
  5. Meisburger, S. P., Thomas, W. C., Watkins, M. B. & Ando, N. X-ray scattering studies of protein structural dynamics. Chem. Rev. 117, 7615–7672 (2017). · DOI
  6. Wall, M. E., Wolff, A. M. & Fraser, J. S. Bringing diffuse x-ray scattering into focus. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 50, 109–116 (2018). · DOI
  7. Woldeyes, R. A., Sivak, D. A. & Fraser, J. S. E pluribus unum, no more: From one crystal, many conformations. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 28, 56–62 (2014). · DOI
  8. Helliwell, J. R. Macromolecular crystallography with synchrotron radiation. (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
  9. Fischer, M. Macromolecular room temperature crystallography. Q. Rev. Biophys. 54, e1 (2021). · DOI
  10. Meisburger, S. P. & Ando, N. Correlated motions from crystallography beyond diffraction. Acc. Chem. Res. 50, 580–583 (2017). · DOI
  11. Meisburger, S. P., Case, D. A. & Ando, N. Diffuse X-ray scattering from correlated motions in a protein crystal. Nat. Commun. 11, 1271 (2020). · DOI
  12. Holton, J. M., Classen, S., Frankel, K. A. & Tainer, J. A. The R-factor gap in macromolecular crystallography: An untapped potential for insights on accurate structures. FEBS J. 281, 4046–4060 (2014). · DOI
  13. Janowski, P. A., Liu, C., Deckman, J. & Case, D. A. Molecular dynamics simulation of triclinic lysozyme in a crystal lattice. Protein Sci. 25, 87–102 (2016). · DOI
  14. Wall, M. E. Internal protein motions in molecular-dynamics simulations of Bragg and diffuse X-ray scattering. IUCrJ 5, 172–181 (2018). · DOI
  15. Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T. & Flannery, B. P. Numerical Recipes 3rd Edition: The Art of Scientific Computing. (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
  16. Meisburger, S. & Ando, N. X-ray diffraction data for: Hen lysozyme. PDB code 6O2H. https://doi.org/10.15785/SBGRID/747 (2020). · DOI
  17. Meisburger, S. P., Case, D. A. & Ando, N. Diffuse x-ray scattering from correlated motions in a protein crystal (CXIDB ID 128) https://doi.org/10.11577/1601281 (2020). · DOI
  18. Wall, M. E. et al. Conformational dynamics of a crystalline protein from microsecond-scale molecular dynamics simulations and diffuse X-ray scattering. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 17887–17892 (2014). · DOI
  19. Agarwal, P. K., Billeter, S. R., Rajagopalan, P. R., Benkovic, S. J. & Hammes-Schiffer, S. Network of coupled promoting motions in enzyme catalysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 2794–2799 (2002). · DOI
  20. Wang, L., Goodey, N. M., Benkovic, S. J. & Kohen, A. Coordinated effects of distal mutations on environmentally coupled tunneling in dihydrofolate reductase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 15753–15758 (2006). · DOI
  21. Boehr, D. D., McElheny, D., Dyson, H. J. & Wright, P. E. The dynamic energy landscape of dihydrofolate reductase catalysis. Science 313, 1638–1642 (2006). · DOI
  22. Bhabha, G. et al. A dynamic knockout reveals that conformational fluctuations influence the chemical step of enzyme catalysis. Science 332, 234–238 (2011). · DOI
  23. Stojković, V., Perissinotti, L. L., Willmer, D., Benkovic, S. J. & Kohen, A. Effects of the donor–acceptor distance and dynamics on hydride tunneling in the dihydrofolate reductase catalyzed reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 1738–1745 (2012). · DOI
  24. Caspar, D., Clarage, J., Salunke, D. & Clarage, M. Liquid-like movements in crystalline insulin. Nature 332, 659–662 (1988). · DOI
  25. Rose, Y. et al. RCSB protein data bank: architectural advances towards integrated searching and efficient access to macromolecular structure data from the PDB archive. J. Mol. Biol. 433, 166704 (2021). · DOI
  26. De Klijn, T., Schreurs, A. & Kroon-Batenburg, L. Rigid-body motion is the main source of diffuse scattering in protein crystallography. IUCrJ 6, 277–289 (2019). · DOI
  27. Peck, A., Poitevin, F. & Lane, T. J. Intermolecular correlations are necessary to explain diffuse scattering from protein crystals. IUCrJ 5, 211–222 (2018). · DOI
  28. Wych, D. C. et al. Molecular-dynamics simulation methods for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D. Struct. Biol. 79, 50–65 (2023). · DOI
  29. Hura, G. et al. Water structure as a function of temperature from x-ray scattering experiments and ab initio molecular dynamics. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 5, 1981–1991 (2003). · DOI
  30. Schanda, P. & Ernst, M. Studying dynamics by magic-angle spinning solid-state NMR spectroscopy: Principles and applications to biomolecules. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 96, 1–46 (2016). · DOI
  31. Kabsch, W. XDS. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 125–132 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  32. Potterton, L. et al. CCP4i2: The new graphical user interface to the CCP4 program suite. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 74, 68–84 (2018). · DOI
  33. Winn, M. D. et al. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 235–242 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  34. Evans, P. R. & Murshudov, G. N. How good are my data and what is the resolution? Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 69, 1204–1214 (2013). · DOI
  35. McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr 40, 658–674 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  36. Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of coot. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  37. Murshudov, G. N. et al. REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 355–367 (2011). · DOI
  38. Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 12–21 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  39. Schomaker, V. & Trueblood, K. N. On the rigid-body motion of molecules in crystals. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Crystallogr. Cryst. Chem. 24, 63–76 (1968). · DOI
  40. Willis, B. T. M. Thermal diffuse scattering of X-rays and neutrons. in International Tables for Crystallography Volume B: Reciprocal space (ed. Shmueli, U.) 400–406 (Springer Netherlands, 2001). https://doi.org/10.1107/97809553602060000563 (2001). · DOI
  41. Born, M. & Huang, K. Dynamical theory of crystal lattices. (Clarendon Press, 1954).
  42. Wall, M. E., Clarage, J. B. & Phillips, G. N. Motions of calmodulin characterized using both bragg and diffuse x-ray scattering. Structure 5, 1599–1612 (1997). · DOI
  43. Maier, J. A. et al. ff14SB: improving the accuracy of protein side chain and backbone parameters from ff99SB. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 3696–3713 (2015). · DOI
  44. Hornak, V. et al. Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf 65, 712–725 (2006). · DOI
  45. Izadi, S., Anandakrishnan, R. & Onufriev, A. V. Building water models: a different approach. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 3863–3871 (2014). · DOI
  46. Crosas, E. et al. Uridine as a new scavenger for synchrotron-based structural biology techniques. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 24, 53–62 (2017). · DOI
  47. Hopkins, C. W., Le Grand, S., Walker, R. C. & Roitberg, A. E. Long-time-step molecular dynamics through hydrogen mass repartitioning. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 1864–1874 (2015). · DOI
  48. Croarkin, C. 2.6.5.2.2. Bisquare weighting. NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of Statistical Methods https://doi.org/10.18434/M32189 (2012). · DOI
  49. Meisburger, S. & Ando, N. X-ray diffraction data for: Hen lysozyme. PDB code 8DYZ. https://doi.org/10.15785/SBGRID/957 (2022). · DOI
  50. Meisburger, S., Imran, SM. S. & Ando, N. X-ray diffraction data for: Hen lysozyme. PDB code 8DZ7. https://doi.org/10.15785/SBGRID/958 (2022). · DOI
  51. Morin, A. et al. Cutting edge: Collaboration gets the most out of software. eLife 2, e01456 (2013). · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Meisburger, S. P., Case, D. A., & Ando, N.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Ando, Nozomi
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2023-03-03
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
1228-1228
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4323048702
Cited by
20
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (DMR-1829070)
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (1-P30-GM124166-01A1)
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (F32GM117757, GM122086, GM124847)
  • Startup funds from Cornell University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
Keywords
collective protein motions, protein crystals, rigid body vibration, elastic network model, protein function
MeSH terms
Motion, Radiography, Vibration, X-Rays, Workflow

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review