Cited by 10Genomics and Rare DiseasesBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Simulation of undiagnosed patients with novel genetic conditions

Open access
Alsentzer, Emily, Finlayson, Samuel G., Li, Michelle M., Undiagnosed Diseases Network, Kobren, Shilpa N., Kohane, Isaac S.·2023·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Rare Mendelian disorders pose a major diagnostic challenge and collectively affect 300–400 million patients worldwide. Many automated tools aim to uncover causal genes in patients with suspected genetic disorders, but evaluation of these tools is limited due to the lack of comprehensive benchmark datasets that include previously unpublished conditions. Here, we present a computational pipeline that simulates realistic clinical datasets to address this deficit. Our framework jointly simulates complex phenotypes and challenging candidate genes and produces patients with novel genetic conditions. We demonstrate the similarity of our simulated patients to real patients from the Undiagnosed Diseases Network and evaluate common gene prioritization methods on the simulated cohort. These prioritization methods recover known gene-disease associations but perform poorly on diagnosing patients with novel genetic disorders. Our publicly-available dataset and codebase can be utilized by medical genetics researchers to evaluate, compare, and improve tools that aid in the diagnostic process.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-023-41980-6

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The synthetic cohort is essential for training SHEPHERD, as it is considerably larger, more diverse, and more representative of phenotype and genotype heterogeneity than any real-world dataset of rare disease patients.

    “The synthetic cohort is essential for training SHEPHERD, as it is considerably larger, more diverse, and more representative of phenotype and genotype heterogeneity than any real-world dataset of rare disease patients (Fig. 2c)48.”

    From Few shot learning for phenotype-driven diagnosis of patients with rare genetic diseases (2025) · cites this paper as [48]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) proposes simulated patients as training data for rare-disease machine-learning models and says they could expose models to diverse genetic disorders. The Results report a cohort of 42,680 simulated patients, and the Introduction describes simulation as scalable. The paper does not establish that this cohort is essential for training SHEPHERD or that it is more representative of phenotype and genotype heterogeneity than any real-world rare-disease dataset. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The simulated patients were generated using an approach designed to generate realistic rare disease patients grounded in medical knowledge, and they have been shown to phenotypically and genetically resemble real-world rare disease patients.

    “The simulated patients were generated using an approach designed to generate realistic rare disease patients grounded in medical knowledge, and they have been shown to phenotypically and genetically resemble real-world rare disease patients48.”
  • The simulated patients are created using an adaptive simulation approach that generates realistic rare disease patients with varying numbers of phenotype terms and candidate genes.

    “The simulated patients are created using an adaptive simulation approach that generates realistic rare disease patients with varying numbers of phenotype terms and candidate genes48.”
  • The simulated patients closely resemble real-world patients found in the UDN.

    “The simulated patients closely resemble real-world patients found in the UDN.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [23]Smedley D Next-generation diagnostics and disease-gene discovery with the Exomiser Nat. Protoc. 2015 10 2004 2015 10.1038/nprot.2015.124 26562621 PMC5467691 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [36]Maiella S Rath A Angin C Mousson F Kremp O [Orphanet and its consortium: where to find expert-validated information on rare diseases] Rev. Neurol. 2013 169 Suppl 1 S3 8 10.1016/S0035-3787(13)70052-3 23452769 · DOI
  3. [45]Alsentzer, E., Finlayson, S., Li, M., Kobren, S. & Kohane, I. Simulation of undiagnosed patients with novel genetic conditions. GitHub Repository10.5281/zenodo.8190872 (2023). PMC10570269 37828001

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alsentzer, E., Finlayson, S. G., Li, M. M., Undiagnosed Diseases Network, Kobren, S. N., & Kohane, I. S.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Seattle Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
  • Kobren, Shilpa N.
  • Kohane, Isaac S.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2023-10-12
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
6403-6403
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387580247
Cited by
10
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (U54NS093793)
  • Microsoft Research
  • National Institutes of Health (U01TR001395, U01TR002471)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (U01HG010233, U01HG007709, U01HG007943, U01HG007703, U01HG007530, U01HG010230, U01HG007674, U01HG010217, U01HG007690, U01HG007942, U01HG007708, U01HG010219, U01HG010215, U01HG007672, T32HG002295)
  • NIH Office of the Director (U01HG007709, U54 NS108251, U01HG007690, U01HG010230, U01HG007530, U01HG007708, U54 NS093793, U01HG007672, U01HG007942)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007753)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U54NS093793, U54NS108251)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • Common Fund (U01HG007530, U01TR001395, U01HG007709, U01HG007690, U01HG007672, U01HG007942, U01HG007708, U01HG007943, U54NS093793, U01 HG007703)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
rare Mendelian disorders, benchmark dataset, gene prioritization, candidate gene identification, Undiagnosed Diseases Network, gene-disease association, computational pipeline
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Humans, Patients, Phenotype, Rare Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review