Cited by 7Cellular transport and secretionProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structural basis for Rab6 activation by the Ric1-Rgp1 complex

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Rab GTPases act as molecular switches to regulate organelle homeostasis and membrane trafficking. Rab6 plays a central role in regulating cargo flux through the Golgi and is activated via nucleotide exchange by the Ric1-Rgp1 protein complex. Ric1-Rgp1 is conserved throughout eukaryotes but the structural and mechanistic basis for its function has not been established. Here we report the cryoEM structure of a Ric1-Rgp1-Rab6 complex representing a key intermediate of the nucleotide exchange reaction. This structure reveals the overall architecture of the complex and enabled us to identify interactions critical for proper recognition and activation of Rab6 on the Golgi membrane surface. Ric1-Rgp1 interacts with the nucleotide-binding domain of Rab6 using an uncharacterized helical domain, which we establish as a novel RabGEF domain by identifying residues required for Rab6 nucleotide exchange. Unexpectedly, the complex uses an arrestin fold to interact with the Rab6 hypervariable domain, indicating that interactions with the unstructured C-terminal regions of Rab GTPases may be a common specificity mechanism used by their activators. Collectively, our findings provide a detailed mechanistic understanding of regulated Rab6 activation at the Golgi.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-024-54869-9

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 81

  1. Pfeffer, S. R. Rab GTPases: master regulators that establish the secretory and endocytic pathways. Mol. Biol. Cell 28, 712–715 (2017). · DOI
  2. Hutagalung, A. H. & Novick, P. J. Role of Rab GTPases in membrane traffic and cell physiology. Physiol. Rev. 91, 119–149 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Barr, F. A. Review series: Rab GTPases and membrane identity: causal or inconsequential? J. Cell Biol. 202, 191–199 (2013). · DOI
  4. Goody, R. S., Rak, A. & Alexandrov, K. The structural and mechanistic basis for recycling of Rab proteins between membrane compartments. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 62, 1657–1670 (2005). · DOI
  5. Martinez, O. et al. The small GTP-binding protein rab6 functions in intra-Golgi transport. J. Cell Biol. 127, 1575–1588 (1994). · DOI
  6. Dickson, L. J., Liu, S. & Storrie, B. Rab6 is required for rapid, cisternal-specific, intra-Golgi cargo transport. Sci. Rep. 10, 16604 (2020). · DOI
  7. Siniossoglou, S., Peak-Chew, S. Y. & Pelham, H. R. Ric1p and Rgp1p form a complex that catalyses nucleotide exchange on Ypt6p. EMBO J. 19, 4885–4894 (2000). · DOI
  8. Li, B. & Warner, J. R. Mutation of the Rab6 homologue of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, YPT6, inhibits both early Golgi function and ribosome biosynthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 16813–16819 (1996). · DOI
  9. Siniossoglou, S. & Pelham, H. R. An effector of Ypt6p binds the SNARE Tlg1p and mediates selective fusion of vesicles with late Golgi membranes. EMBO J. 20, 5991–5998 (2001). · DOI
  10. Day, K. J., Casler, J. C. & Glick, B. S. Budding Yeast Has a Minimal Endomembrane System. Dev. Cell 44, 56–72.e4 (2018). · DOI
  11. Yang, S. & Rosenwald, A. G. Autophagy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires the monomeric GTP-binding proteins, Arl1 and Ypt6. Autophagy 12, 1721–1737 (2016). · DOI
  12. Ayala, C. I., Kim, J. & Neufeld, T. P. Rab6 promotes insulin receptor and cathepsin trafficking to regulate autophagy induction and activity in Drosophila. J. Cell Sci. 131, jcs216127 (2018). · DOI
  13. Miserey-Lenkei, S. et al. Rab and actomyosin-dependent fission of transport vesicles at the Golgi complex. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 645–654 (2010). · DOI
  14. Bardin, S. et al. Phenotypic characterisation of RAB6A knockout mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Biol. Cell 107, 427–439 (2015). · DOI
  15. Strom, M., Vollmer, P., Tan, T. J. & Gallwitz, D. A yeast GTPase-activating protein that interacts specifically with a member of the Ypt/Rab family. Nature 361, 736–739 (1993). · DOI
  16. Pusapati, G. V., Luchetti, G. & Pfeffer, S. R. Ric1-Rgp1 complex is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for the late Golgi Rab6A GTPase and an effector of the medial Golgi Rab33B GTPase. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 42129–42137 (2012). · DOI
  17. Wang, W., Sacher, M. & Ferro-Novick, S. TRAPP stimulates guanine nucleotide exchange on Ypt1p. J. Cell Biol. 151, 289–296 (2000). · DOI
  18. Jones, S., Newman, C., Liu, F. & Segev, N. The TRAPP complex is a nucleotide exchanger for Ypt1 and Ypt31/32. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 4403–4411 (2000). · DOI
  19. Nordmann, M. et al. The Mon1-Ccz1 complex is the GEF of the late endosomal Rab7 homolog Ypt7. Curr. Biol. 20, 1654–1659 (2010). · DOI
  20. Poteryaev, D., Datta, S., Ackema, K., Zerial, M. & Spang, A. Identification of the switch in early-to-late endosome transition. Cell 141, 497–508 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  21. Vetter, I. R. & Wittinghofer, A. The guanine nucleotide-binding switch in three dimensions. Science 294, 1299–1304 (2001). · DOI · Paper page
  22. Chattopadhyay, D. et al. Structure of the nucleotide-binding domain of Plasmodium falciparum rab6 in the GDP-bound form. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 56, 937–944 (2000). · DOI
  23. Eathiraj, S., Pan, X., Ritacco, C. & Lambright, D. G. Structural basis of family-wide Rab GTPase recognition by rabenosyn-5. Nature 436, 415–419 (2005). · DOI
  24. Thomas, L. L. & Fromme, J. C. GTPase cross talk regulates TRAPPII activation of Rab11 homologues during vesicle biogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 215, 499–513 (2016). · DOI
  25. Thomas, L. L., van der Vegt, S. A. & Fromme, J. C. A Steric Gating Mechanism Dictates the Substrate Specificity of a Rab-GEF. Dev. Cell 48, 100–114.e9 (2019). · DOI
  26. Klemm, R. W. et al. Segregation of sphingolipids and sterols during formation of secretory vesicles at the trans-Golgi network. J. Cell Biol. 185, 601–612 (2009). · DOI
  27. Beranger, F. et al. Determination of structural requirements for the interaction of Rab6 with RabGDI and Rab geranylgeranyltransferase. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 13637–13643 (1994). · DOI
  28. Beranger, F., Paterson, H., Powers, S., de Gunzburg, J. & Hancock, J. F. The effector domain of Rab6, plus a highly hydrophobic C terminus, is required for Golgi apparatus localization. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 744–758 (1994).
  29. Langemeyer, L., Perz, A., Kümmel, D. & Ungermann, C. A guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) limits Rab GTPase-driven membrane fusion. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 731–739 (2018). · DOI
  30. Chen, Y.-T. et al. Action of Arl1 GTPase and golgin Imh1 in Ypt6-independent retrograde transport from endosomes to the trans-Golgi network. Mol. Biol. Cell 30, 1008–1019 (2019). · DOI
  31. Mossessova, E., Corpina, R. A. & Goldberg, J. Crystal structure of ARF1*Sec7 complexed with Brefeldin A and its implications for the guanine nucleotide exchange mechanism. Mol. Cell 12, 1403–1411 (2003). · DOI
  32. Renault, L., Guibert, B. & Cherfils, J. Structural snapshots of the mechanism and inhibition of a guanine nucleotide exchange factor. Nature 426, 525–530 (2003). · DOI
  33. Rak, A. et al. Structure of the Rab7:REP-1 complex: insights into the mechanism of Rab prenylation and choroideremia disease. Cell 117, 749–760 (2004). · DOI
  34. Joiner, A. M. et al. Structural basis of TRAPPIII-mediated Rab1 activation. EMBO J. 40, e107607 (2021). · DOI
  35. Bagde, S. R. & Fromme, J. C. Structure of a TRAPPII-Rab11 activation intermediate reveals GTPase substrate selection mechanisms. Sci. Adv. 8, eabn7446 (2022). · DOI
  36. Bagde, S. R. & Fromme, J. C. The TRAPP complexes: discriminating GTPases in context. FEBS Lett. 597, 721–733 (2023). · DOI
  37. Cabrera, M. & Ungermann, C. Guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) have a critical but not exclusive role in organelle localization of Rab GTPases. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 28704–28712 (2013). · DOI
  38. Thomas, L. L., Joiner, A. M. N. & Fromme, J. C. The TRAPPIII complex activates the GTPase Ypt1 (Rab1) in the secretory pathway. J. Cell Biol. 217, 283–298 (2018). · DOI
  39. Liang, Y., Morozova, N., Tokarev, A. A., Mulholland, J. W. & Segev, N. The role of Trs65 in the Ypt/Rab guanine nucleotide exchange factor function of the TRAPP II complex. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 2533–2541 (2007). · DOI
  40. Montpetit, B. & Conibear, E. Identification of the novel TRAPP associated protein Tca17. Traffic 10, 713–723 (2009). · DOI
  41. Pereira-Leal, J. B. & Seabra, M. C. Evolution of the Rab family of small GTP-binding proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 313, 889–901 (2001). · DOI
  42. Brighouse, A., Dacks, J. B. & Field, M. C. Rab protein evolution and the history of the eukaryotic endomembrane system. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 67, 3449–3465 (2010). · DOI
  43. Elias, M., Brighouse, A., Gabernet-Castello, C., Field, M. C. & Dacks, J. B. Sculpting the endomembrane system in deep time: high resolution phylogenetics of Rab GTPases. J. Cell Sci. 125, 2500–2508 (2012).
  44. Bigay, J., Casella, J.-F., Drin, G., Mesmin, B. & Antonny, B. ArfGAP1 responds to membrane curvature through the folding of a lipid packing sensor motif. EMBO J. 24, 2244–2253 (2005). · DOI
  45. Muccini, A. J., Gustafson, M. A. & Fromme, J. C. Structural basis for activation of Arf1 at the Golgi complex. Cell Rep. 40, 111282 (2022). · DOI
  46. Manzer, K. M. & Fromme, J. C. The Arf-GAP Age2 localizes to the late-Golgi via a conserved amphipathic helix. Mol. Biol. Cell 34, ar119 (2023). · DOI · Paper page
  47. Brownfield, B. A., Richardson, B. C., Halaby, S. L. & Fromme, J. C. Sec7 regulatory domains scaffold autoinhibited and active conformations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. Usa. 121, e2318615121 (2024). · DOI · Paper page
  48. Chavrier, P. et al. Hypervariable C-terminal domain of rab proteins acts as a targeting signal. Nature 353, 769–772 (1991). · DOI
  49. Brennwald, P. & Novick, P. Interactions of three domains distinguishing the Ras-related GTP-binding proteins Ypt1 and Sec4. Nature 362, 560–563 (1993). · DOI
  50. Stenmark, H. et al. Distinct structural elements of rab5 define its functional specificity. EMBO J. 13, 575–583 (1994). · DOI
  51. Ali, B. R., Wasmeier, C., Lamoreux, L., Strom, M. & Seabra, M. C. Multiple regions contribute to membrane targeting of Rab GTPases. J. Cell Sci. 117, 6401–6412 (2004). · DOI
  52. Li, F. et al. The role of the hypervariable C-terminal domain in Rab GTPases membrane targeting. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. Usa. 111, 2572–2577 (2014). · DOI
  53. Klink, B. U. et al. Structure of the Mon1-Ccz1 complex reveals molecular basis of membrane binding for Rab7 activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 119, e2121494119 (2022). · DOI
  54. Herrmann, E. et al. Structure of the metazoan Rab7 GEF complex Mon1-Ccz1-Bulli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. Usa. 120, e2301908120 (2023). · DOI
  55. Herzik, M. A. Jr, Wu, M. & Lander, G. C. Achieving better-than-3-Å resolution by single-particle cryo-EM at 200 keV. Nat. Methods 14, 1075–1078 (2017). · DOI
  56. Herzik, M. A. Jr, Wu, M. & Lander, G. C. High-resolution structure determination of sub-100 kDa complexes using conventional cryo-EM. Nat. Commun. 10, 1032 (2019). · DOI
  57. Schorb, M., Haberbosch, I., Hagen, W. J. H., Schwab, Y. & Mastronarde, D. N. Software tools for automated transmission electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 16, 471–477 (2019). · DOI
  58. Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. Elife 7, e42166 (2018). · DOI
  59. Kimanius, D., Dong, L., Sharov, G., Nakane, T. & Scheres, S. H. W. New tools for automated cryo-EM single-particle analysis in RELION-4.0. Biochem. J. 478, 4169–4185 (2021). · DOI
  60. Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017). · DOI
  61. Zhang, K. Gctf: Real-time CTF determination and correction. J. Struct. Biol. 193, 1–12 (2016). · DOI
  62. Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  63. Kucukelbir, A., Sigworth, F. J. & Tagare, H. D. Quantifying the local resolution of cryo-EM density maps. Nat. Methods 11, 63–65 (2014). · DOI
  64. Terwilliger, T. C., Adams, P. D., Afonine, P. V. & Sobolev, O. V. A fully automatic method yielding initial models from high-resolution cryo-electron microscopy maps. Nat. Methods 15, 905–908 (2018). · DOI
  65. Liebschner, D. et al. Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix. Acta Crystallogr D. Struct. Biol. 75, 861–877 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  66. Casañal, A., Lohkamp, B. & Emsley, P. Current developments in Coot for macromolecular model building of Electron Cryo-microscopy and Crystallographic Data. Protein Sci. 29, 1069–1078 (2020). · DOI
  67. Afonine, P. V. et al. Real-space refinement in PHENIX for cryo-EM and crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D. Struct. Biol. 74, 531–544 (2018). · DOI
  68. Afonine, P. V. et al. New tools for the analysis and validation of cryo-EM maps and atomic models. Acta Crystallogr D. Struct. Biol. 74, 814–840 (2018). · DOI
  69. Prisant, M. G., Williams, C. J., Chen, V. B., Richardson, J. S. & Richardson, D. C. New tools in MolProbity validation: CaBLAM for CryoEM backbone, UnDowser to rethink ‘waters,’ and NGL Viewer to recapture online 3D graphics. Protein Sci. 29, 315–329 (2020). · DOI
  70. Morin, A. et al. Collaboration gets the most out of software. Elife 2, e01456 (2013). · DOI
  71. Dong, G., Medkova, M., Novick, P. & Reinisch, K. M. A catalytic coiled coil: structural insights into the activation of the Rab GTPase Sec4p by Sec2p. Mol. Cell 25, 455–462 (2007). · DOI
  72. Schoebel, S., Oesterlin, L. K., Blankenfeldt, W., Goody, R. S. & Itzen, A. RabGDI displacement by DrrA from Legionella is a consequence of its guanine nucleotide exchange activity. Mol. Cell 36, 1060–1072 (2009). · DOI
  73. Kiontke, S. et al. Architecture and mechanism of the late endosomal Rab7-like Ypt7 guanine nucleotide exchange factor complex Mon1-Ccz1. Nat. Commun. 8, 14034 (2017). · DOI
  74. Cai, Y. et al. The structural basis for activation of the Rab Ypt1p by the TRAPP membrane-tethering complexes. Cell 133, 1202–1213 (2008). · DOI
  75. Mi, C. et al. Structural basis for assembly of TRAPPII complex and specific activation of GTPase Ypt31/32. Sci. Adv. 8, eabi5603 (2022). · DOI
  76. Wu, X. et al. Insights regarding guanine nucleotide exchange from the structure of a DENN-domain protein complexed with its Rab GTPase substrate. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. Usa. 108, 18672–18677 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  77. Zhang, Z. et al. Molecular mechanism for Rabex-5 GEF activation by Rabaptin-5. Elife 3, e02687 (2014). · DOI
  78. Delprato, A. & Lambright, D. G. Structural basis for Rab GTPase activation by VPS9 domain exchange factors. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 406–412 (2007). · DOI
  79. Uejima, T. et al. Direct metal recognition by guanine nucleotide-exchange factor in the initial step of the exchange reaction. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 69, 345–351 (2013). · DOI
  80. Jenkins, M. L. et al. Structural determinants of Rab11 activation by the guanine nucleotide exchange factor SH3BP5. Nat. Commun. 9, 3772 (2018). · DOI
  81. Pylypenko, O. et al. Structure of doubly prenylated Ypt1:GDI complex and the mechanism of GDI-mediated Rab recycling. EMBO J. 25, 13–23 (2006). · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Feathers, J. R., Vignogna, R. C., & Fromme, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Fromme, J. Christopher
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2024-12-04
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
10561-10561
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404998466
Cited by
7
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM136258, F32GM155980)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
Rab6, nucleotide exchange, Golgi apparatus, membrane trafficking, protein complex structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review