Cited by 6Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchDental Health and Care UtilizationOral Health Pathology and Treatment

Topical prebiotic nitrate: optimizing the ‘hang-time’, source and dose for specific oral or systemic effects

Open access
Rosier, Bob T., Mira, Alex·2024·npj Biofilms and Microbiomes

Abstract

In our opinion, the ‘hang-time’ of nitrate-containing products discussed in the letter by Green and Green is an interesting variable that should be considered when nitrate-based treatment or prevention strategies are designed. However, due to direct nitrate recycling after nitrate intake, products with a long ‘hang-time’ (e.g., chewing gum) may not always have an advantage compared to products with a short ‘hang-time’ (e.g., vegetable juices). We argue that extending the ‘hang-time’ is especially relevant and potentially beneficial for different applications, such as using a low nitrate dose to stimulate the oral effects, reaching oral tissues that may otherwise not be exposed to dietary nitrate (e.g., periodontal pockets), and providing a longer nitrate exposure in individuals with an impaired salivary flow. Apart from the ‘hang-time’, other important variables are the nitrate dose and source (e.g., different salts and vegetable extracts), as well as the desired effect (e.g., an oral effect versus systemic effects). Finally, we believe that the alterations in salivary microbiota observed before and after chewing three nitrate-rich gums over a period of ~5 h, as reported by Green and Green, could be considered beneficial. However, the oral microbiota composition is affected by the circadian rhythm and the effect of gum mastication should be evaluated. These results should thus be confirmed by a placebo-controlled study, where these confounding factors can be accounted for.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41522-024-00528-2

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The timing of optimal intake may affect the efficiency of oral bacterial nitrate reduction.

    “the timing of optimal intake may affect the efficiency of oral bacterial nitrate reduction [106,252,271,292].”

    From Dietary Nitrate-Rich Vegetables as Natural Modulators of Health: Mechanisms and Benefits in Ageing Populations (2026) · cites this paper as [292]

    The paper’s Abstract says nitrate-reducing oral bacteria fluctuate over the hours of the day and describes changes in salivary nitrate after intake. These observations make a timing effect plausible, but the paper does not establish that an optimal intake time affects the efficiency of bacterial nitrate reduction. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Highly processed beetroot products may exhibit reduced nitrate stability and diminished physiological impact.

    “highly processed beetroot products may exhibit reduced nitrate stability and diminished physiological impact [106,252,271,292].”

    From Dietary Nitrate-Rich Vegetables as Natural Modulators of Health: Mechanisms and Benefits in Ageing Populations (2026) · cites this paper as [292]

    The paper’s Fig. 2 passage reports that a nitrate-rich beetroot supplement limited oral acidification but did not affect blood pressure. It does not connect either result to how heavily the product was processed. Searches for beetroot processing, storage, and nitrate stability found no passage addressing whether processing reduces nitrate stability or physiological impact. (LLM, conf=0.71)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosier, B. T., & Mira, A.
Affiliations
Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (ES)
Corresponding author
Rosier, Bob T.
Venue
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
Published
2024-07-18
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
58-58
ISSN
2055-5008 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400778946
Cited by
6
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • npj Biofilms and Microbiomes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (10.13039.501100011033, 10.13039, .13039/501100011033, 501100011033)
  • European Regional Development Fund (10.13039/501100011033, 13039/501100011033, 501100011033)
  • Agencia Estatal de Investigación (501100011033, 10.13039/501100011033, 13039, .13039/501100011033, 10.13039)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
Keywords
dietary nitrate, topical nitrate, chewing gum, nitrate sources, oral microbiota, salivary flow, periodontal pockets, circadian rhythm, nitrate recycling
MeSH terms
Fruit and Vegetable Juices, Administration, Topical, Chewing Gum, Humans, Mouth, Nitrates, Saliva, Prebiotics, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review