Cited by 244RNA Interference and Gene DeliverySARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

Effect of mRNA-LNP components of two globally-marketed COVID-19 vaccines on efficacy and stability

Open access
Zhang, Lizhou, More, Kunal R., Ojha, Amrita, Jackson, Cody B., Quinlan, Brian D., Li, Hao, He, Wenhui, Farzan, Michael +2 more·2023·npj Vaccines

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna successfully developed nucleoside-modified mRNA lipid nanoparticle (LNP) vaccines. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein expressed by those vaccines are identical in amino acid sequence, but several key components are distinct. Here, we compared the effect of ionizable lipids, untranslated regions (UTRs), and nucleotide composition of the two vaccines, focusing on mRNA delivery, antibody generation, and long-term stability. We found that the ionizable lipid, SM-102, in Moderna’s vaccine performs better than ALC-0315 in Pfizer-BioNTech’s vaccine for intramuscular delivery of mRNA and antibody production in mice and long-term stability at 4 °C. Moreover, Pfizer-BioNTech’s 5′ UTR and Moderna’s 3′ UTR outperform their counterparts in their contribution to transgene expression in mice. We further found that varying N1-methylpseudouridine content at the wobble position of mRNA has little effect on vaccine efficacy. These findings may contribute to the further improvement of nucleoside-modified mRNA-LNP vaccines and therapeutics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41541-023-00751-6

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Zhang, L., More, K. R., Ojha, A., Jackson, C. B., Quinlan, B. D., Li, H., He, W., Farzan, M., Pardi, N., & Choe, H.
Affiliations
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • The Herbert Wertheim UF Scripps Institute for Biomedical Innovation & Technology (US)
  • Scripps Research Institute (US)
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
  • Zhang, Lizhou
  • Choe, Hyeryun
Venue
npj Vaccines
Published
2023-10-11
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
156-156
ISSN
2059-0105 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387526062
Cited by
244
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 86 · 2025: 110 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 3
FWCI
21.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • npj Vaccines (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (R01 AI129868)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
COVID-19 vaccines, mRNA-LNP vaccine, ionizable lipids, SM-102, ALC-0315, 5' untranslated region, 3' untranslated region, N1-methylpseudouridine, wobble position, nucleoside-modified mRNA, mRNA delivery, antibody response, vaccine stability, SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, BNT162b2, Moderna vaccine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review