Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 686

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Current and future global climate impacts resulting from COVID-19

Open access
Forster, Piers M., Forster, Harriet I., Evans, Mat J., Gidden, Matthew J., Jones, Chris D., Keller, Christoph A., Lamboll, Robin D., Quéré, Corinne Le, Rogelj, Joeri, Rosen, Deborah, Schleussner, Carl-Friedrich, Richardson, Thomas B., Smith, Christopher J., Turnock, Steven T.·2020·Nature Climate Change

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41558-020-0883-0

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Liu, Z. et al. COVID-19 causes record decline in global CO2 emissions. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.13614 (2020). · arXiv
  2. Bauwens, M. et al. Impact of coronavirus outbreak on NO2 pollution assessed using TROPOMI and OMI observations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL087978 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Shi, X. & Brasseur, G. P. The response in air quality to the reduction of Chinese economic activities during the COVID-19 outbreak. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL088070 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Zhang, R. et al. NOx emission reduction and recovery during COVID-19 in East China. Atmosphere 11, 433 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Friedlingstein, P. et al. Global carbon budget 2019. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 11, 1783–1838 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Operating System Market Share Worldwide (StatCounter Global Stats, accessed 24 May 2020); https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share#quarterly-201903-201903-map
  7. Crippa, M. et al. High resolution temporal profiles in the emissions database for global atmospheric research. Sci. Data 7, 1–17 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Jones, C. D. et al. Simulating the earth system response to negative emissions. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 95012 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  9. Le, T. et al. Unexpected air pollution with marked emission reductions during the COVID-19 outbreak in China. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb7431 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  10. Grange, S. K. & Carslaw, D. C. Using meteorological normalisation to detect interventions in air quality time series. Sci. Total Environ. 653, 578–588 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  11. Smith, C. J. et al. FAIR v1.3: a simple emissions-based impulse response and carbon cycle model. Geosci. Model Dev. 11, 2273–2297 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  12. Luo, F. et al. Projected near-term changes of temperature extremes in Europe and China under different aerosol emissions. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 034013 (2020). · DOI
  13. Samset, B. H. et al. Climate impacts from a removal of anthropogenic aerosol emissions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 1020–1029 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  14. Dentener, F. et al. Lower air pollution during COVID-19 lock-down: improving models and methods estimating ozone impacts on crops. Preprint at https://eartharxiv.org/de9fs/ (2020). · DOI
  15. Turnock, S. T. et al. The impact of future emission policies on tropospheric ozone using a parameterised approach. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18, 8953–8978 (2018). · DOI
  16. Turnock, S. T., Wild, O., Sellar, A. & O’Connor, F. M. 300 years of tropospheric ozone changes using CMIP6 scenarios with a parameterised approach. Atmos. Environ. 213, 686–698 (2019). · DOI
  17. Shindell, D. & Smith, C. J. Climate and air-quality benefits of a realistic phase-out of fossil fuels. Nature 573, 408–411 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Lamboll, R. D. et al. Silicone v1.0.0: an open-source Python package for inferring missing emissions data for climate change research (Geoscientific Model Development, 2020); https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-138 · doi:10.5194/gmd-2020-138
  19. Fricko, O. et al. The marker quantification of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2: a middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21st century. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 251–267 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  20. van Vuuren, D. P. et al. Energy, land-use and greenhouse gas emissions trajectories under a green growth paradigm. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 237–250 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  21. Hu, L. et al. Global simulation of tropospheric chemistry at 12.5 km resolution: performance and evaluation of the GEOS-Chem chemical module (v10-1) within the NASA GEOS Earth system model (GEOS-5 ESM). Geosci. Model Dev. 11, 4603–4620 (2018). · DOI
  22. Janssens-Maenhout, G. et al. HTAP_v2.2: a mosaic of regional and global emission grid maps for 2008 and 2010 to study hemispheric transport of air pollution. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 11411–11432 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  23. Myhre, G. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 659–740 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.018 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Geoffroy, O. et al. Transient climate response in a two-layer energy-balance model. Part I: Analytical solution and parameter calibration using CMIP5 AOGCM experiments. J. Clim. 26, 1841–1857 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  25. Geoffroy, O. et al. Transient climate response in a two-layer energy-balance model. Part II: Representation of the efficacy of deep-ocean heat uptake and validation for CMIP5 AOGCMs. J. Clim. 26, 1859–1876 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  26. Richardson, M., Cowtan, K., Hawkins, E. & Stolpe, M. B. Reconciled climate response estimates from climate models and the energy budget of Earth. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 931–935 (2016). · DOI
  27. Knutti, R. et al. A climate model projection weighting scheme accounting for performance and interdependence. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 1909–1918 (2017). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 686

Metadata

Authors
Forster, P. M., Forster, H. I., Evans, M. J., Gidden, M. J., Jones, C. D., Keller, C. A., Lamboll, R. D., Quéré, C. L., Rogelj, J., Rosen, D., Schleussner, C.-F., Richardson, T. B., Smith, C. J., & Turnock, S. T.
Venue
Nature Climate Change
Published
2020-08-07
Volume
10
Issue
10
Pages
913-919
ISSN
  • 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-6798
OpenAlex
W3048190739
Cited by
686
References
10
FWCI
50.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence
Funders
  • EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (820829, 641816)
  • RCUK | Natural Environment Research Council (NE/N006038/1)
  • Royal Society (RP\R1\191063)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current and future global climate impacts resulting from COVID-19. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41558-020-0883-0
The paper
Forster, P. M., Forster, H. I., Evans, M. J., Gidden, M. J., Jones, C. D., Keller, C. A., Lamboll, R. D., Quéré, C. L., Rogelj, J., Rosen, D., Schleussner, C.-F., Richardson, T. B., Smith, C. J., & Turnock, S. T. (2020). Current and future global climate impacts resulting from COVID-19. Nature Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0883-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.