Cited by 1,075Climate Change Policy and EconomicsSustainability and Climate Change GovernanceClimate variability and models

The marker quantification of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2: A middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21st century

Open access
Fricko, Oliver, Havlik, Petr, Rogelj, Joeri, Klimont, Zbigniew, Gusti, Mykola, Johnson, Nils, Kolp, Peter, Strubegger, Manfred +15 more·2017·Global Environmental Change

Abstract

Studies of global environmental change make extensive use of scenarios to explore how the future can evolve under a consistent set of assumptions. The recently developed Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) create a framework for the study of climate-related scenario outcomes. Their five narratives span a wide range of worlds that vary in their challenges for climate change mitigation and adaptation. Here we provide background on the quantification that has been selected to serve as the reference, or ‘marker’, implementation for SSP2. The SSP2 narrative describes a middle-of-the-road development in the mitigation and adaptation challenges space. We explain how the narrative has been translated into quantitative assumptions in the IIASA Integrated Assessment Modelling Framework . We show that our SSP2 marker implementation occupies a central position for key metrics along the mitigation and adaptation challenge dimensions. For many dimensions the SSP2 marker implementation also reflects an extension of the historical experience, particularly in terms of carbon and energy intensity improvements in its baseline. This leads to a steady emissions increase over the 21st century, with projected end-of-century warming nearing 4 °C relative to preindustrial levels. On the other hand, SSP2 also shows that global-mean temperature increase can be limited to below 2 °C, pending stringent climate policies throughout the world. The added value of the SSP2 marker implementation for the wider scientific community is that it can serve as a starting point to further explore integrated solutions for achieving multiple societal objectives in light of the climate adaptation and mitigation challenges that society could face over the 21st century.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.004

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A reduction in surface pollutants is generally expected in future scenarios independently of SAI implementation.

    “we generally expect a reduction in surface pollutants in future scenarios independently of SAI implementation (Fricko et al., 2017; Hussain, 2025; Nazarenko et al., 2022)”

    From Air quality impacts of stratospheric aerosol injections are likely small and mainly driven by changes in climate, not aerosol settling (2026) · cites this paper as Fricko et al., 2017

    Section 4.3.1 (page unavailable) discusses future baseline trajectories of air-pollutant emissions and says they differ across SSP scenarios. Our copy does not establish a general reduction in surface pollutant concentrations or assess whether such a reduction is independent of SAI (searched for pollutant declines, surface concentrations, and stratospheric aerosol injection). (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Calvin K., Bond-Lamberty B., Clarke L., Edmonds J., Eom J., Hartin C., Kim S., Kyle P.R. L., Moss R., McJeon H., Patel P., Smith S., Waldhoff S., Wise M., SSP4: A World of Inequality. Global Environ. Change (2016, in press).
  2. Eurek K., Sullivan P., Gleason M., Hettinger D., Heimiller D.M., Lopez A., An improved global wind resource estimate for integrated assessment models, Energy Econ. (In review).
  3. Fujimori S., Hasegawa T., Masui T., Takahashi K., Herran D.S., Dai H., Hijioka Y., Kainuma M., 2016. AIM Implementation of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways, Global Environ. Change (2016, in press).
  4. Havlík, P., Valin, H., Herrero, M., Obersteiner, M., Schmid, E., Rufino, M.C., Mosnier, A., Thornton, P.K., Böttcher, H., Conant, R.T., Frank, S., Fritz, S., Fuss, S., Kraxner, F., Notenbaert, A., 2014. Climate change mitigation through livestock system transitions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 3709-3714.
  5. Herrero, M., Havlik, P., McIntire, J., Palazzo, A., Valin, H., 2014. African livestock futures: realizing the potential of livestock for food security, poverty reduction and the environment in sub-Saharan africa. Office of the Special Representative of the UN Secretary General for Food Security and Nutrition and the United Nations System Influenza Coordination (UNSIC), Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 1- 118.
  6. Jiang, L., O'Neill, B.C., Global urbanization projections for the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways, Global Environ. Change (In press).
  7. Johnson, N., Strubegger, M., McPherson, M., Parkinson, S.C., Krey, V., Sullivan, P., A reduced-form approach for representing the impacts of wind and solar PV deployment on the structure and operation of the electricity system, Energy Econ. (In review).
  8. Kindermann, G., Obersteiner, M., Sohngen, B., Sathaye, J., Andrasko, K., Rametsteiner, E., Schlamadinger, B., Wunder, S., Beach, R., 2008. Global cost estimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided deforestation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 10302-10307.
  9. Manne, A.S., Richels, R.G., 1992. Buying greenhouse insurance the economic costs of carbon dioxide emission limits, vol. 104. MIT, Massachusetts, USA.
  10. Popp A, Calvin K, Fujimori S, P.H., Humpenöder F, Stehfest E, Bodirsky B, Dietrich J P, Doelmann J, Gusti M, Hasegawa T, Kyle P, Obersteiner M, Tabeau A, Takahashi K, Valin H, Waldhoff S, Weindl I, Wise M, Kriegler E, Lotze-Campen H, Fricko O, Riahi K, van Vuuren D., Land use futures in the Shared Socio-Economic Pathways,Global Environ. Change (In review).
  11. Riahi, K., Dentener, F., Gielen, D., Grubler, A., Jewell, J., Klimont, Z., Krey, V., McCollum, D., Pachauri, S., Rao, S., van Ruijven, B., van Vuuren, D.P., Wilson, C., 2012. Global energy assessment -toward a sustainable future. Cambridge University Press and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, and Laxenburg, Austria, pp. 1203-1306.
  12. Riahi K, van Vuuren D P, Kriegler E, Edmonds J, O'Neill B, Fujimori S, Bauer N, Calvin K, Dellink R, Fricko O, Lutz W, Popp A, Cuaresma J C, Leimbach M, Kram T, Rao S, Emmerling J, Hasegawa T, Havlik P, Humpenöder F, Aleluia Da Silva L, Smith S, Stehfest E, Bosetti V, Eom J, Gernaat D, Masui T, Rogelj J, Strefler J, Drouet L, Krey V, Luderer G, Harmsen M, Takahashi K, Wise M, Baumstark L, Doelman J, Kainuma M, Klimont Z, Marangoni G, Moss R, Lotze-Campen H, Obersteiner M, Tabeau A and Tavoni M., The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their Energy, Land Use, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Implications: An Overview, Global Environ. Change (2016, in press).
  13. Rogelj, J., Schaeffer, M., Meinshausen, M., Shindell, D.T., Hare, W., Klimont, Z., Velders, G.J., Amann, M., Schellnhuber, H.J., 2014b. Disentangling the effects of CO2 and short-lived climate forcer mitigation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111, 16325-16330.
  14. Rogner, H.-H., Aguilera, R.F., Bertani, R., Bhattacharya, S.C., Dusseault, M.B., Gagnon, L., Haberl, H., Hoogwijk, M., Johnson, A., Rogner, M.L., Wagner, H., Yakushev, V., 2012. Global energy assessment -toward a sustainable future. Cambridge University Press and International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA and Laxenburg, Austria, pp. 423-512.
  15. Valin, H., Havlík, P., Mosnier, A., Herrero, M., Schmid, E., Obersteiner, M., 2013. Agricultural productivity and greenhouse gas emissions: trade-offs or synergies between mitigation and food security? Environ. Res. Letters 8, 035019.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fricko, O., Havlik, P., Rogelj, J., Klimont, Z., Gusti, M., Johnson, N., Kolp, P., Strubegger, M., Valin, H., Amann, M., Ermolieva, T., Forsell, N., Herrero, M., Heyes, C., Kindermann, G., Krey, V., McCollum, D. L., Obersteiner, M., Pachauri, S., Rao, S., Schmid, E., Schoepp, W., & Riahi, K.
Affiliations
  • International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • BOKU University (AT)
Corresponding author
Fricko, Oliver
Venue
Global Environmental Change
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
42
Pages
251-267
ISSN
0959-3780 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2473101521
Cited by
1,075
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 101 · 2025: 141 · 2024: 165 · 2023: 146 · 2022: 127 · 2021: 148 · 2020: 93 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 8 · 2014: 1
FWCI
99.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Environmental Change (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) (acceptedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
European Union-funded project ‘An integration of mitigation and adaptation options for sustainable livestock production under climate change’ (266018)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
Keywords
Shared Socioeconomic Pathways, SSP2, climate change scenarios, climate change mitigation, climate change adaptation, carbon intensity, energy intensity, greenhouse gas emissions projections, global mean temperature increase, climate policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review