Cited by 359Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityOil Palm Production and Sustainability

Mapping the deforestation footprint of nations reveals growing threat to tropical forests

Hoang, Nguyen Tien, Kanemoto, Keiichiro·2021·Nature Ecology & Evolution

Abstract

Deforestation, a significant threat to biodiversity, is accelerated by global demand for commodities. Although prior literature has linked deforestation to global supply chains, here we provide a fine-scale representation of spatial patterns of deforestation associated with international trade. Using remote sensing data and a multi-region input-output model, we quantify and map the spatiotemporal changes in global deforestation footprints over 15 years (2001-2015) at a 30-m resolution. We find that, while many developed countries, China and India have obtained net forest gains domestically, they have also increased the deforestation embodied in their imports, of which tropical forests are the most threatened biome. Consumption patterns of G7 countries drive an average loss of 3.9 trees per person per year. Some of the hotspots of deforestation embodied in international trade are also biodiversity hotspots, such as in Southeast Asia, Madagascar, Liberia, Central America and the Amazonian rainforest. Our results emphasize the need to reform zero-deforestation policies through strong transnational efforts and by improving supply chain transparency, public-private engagement and financial support for the tropics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41559-021-01417-z

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anthropogenic activities, including fossil fuel use, deforestation, and land-use change, have increased atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations and caused global climate change.

    “These eco-unfriendly practices are the root causes of the increased emissions of anthropogenic sources of global greenhouse gases (GHGs), the primary drivers of climate change.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoang, N. T., & Kanemoto, K.
Affiliations
Research Institute for Humanity and Nature (JP)
Venue
Nature Ecology & Evolution
Published
2021-03-29
Volume
5
Issue
6
Pages
845-853
ISSN
2397-334X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3143824118
Cited by
359
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 23
FWCI
24.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Research Institute for Humanity and Nature (Project No. 14200135)
  • MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (18KT0004)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Oil Palm Production and Sustainability
Keywords
deforestation, tropical forests, international trade, commodity demand, biodiversity hotspots, supply chain transparency, multi-regional input-output model, spatiotemporal mapping, Amazon rainforest
MeSH terms
Central America, China, Commerce, Conservation of Natural Resources, Humans, India, Madagascar, Internationality, Forests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review