Cited by 280Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementOil Palm Production and SustainabilityAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development

Actor-specific contributions to the deforestation slowdown in the Brazilian Amazon

Open access
Godar, Javier, Gardner, Toby A., Tizado, E. Jorge, Pacheco, Pablo·2014·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: The Brazilian Amazon is at a critical juncture after the recent stabilization of deforestation rates. Identifying opportunities for continued deforestation reductions requires an understanding of the contribution of different actors to overall deforestation. We provide the first such assessment, to our knowledge, that reports on two headline findings. First, between 2004 and 2011, areas dominated by properties larger than 500 ha accounted for 48% of the deforestation compared with only 12% for smallholders (<100 ha). Second, the deforestation share attributed to the largest properties (≥2,500 ha) declined by 63% from a peak in 2005, whereas that of smallholders increased by 69%. Further reductions in deforestation are likely to require a shift toward more incentive-based policies that are tailored toward different actors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1322825111

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Godar, J., Gardner, T. A., Tizado, E. J., & Pacheco, P.
Affiliations
  • Stockholm Environment Institute (SE)
  • Universidad de León (ES)
  • Center for International Forestry Research (ID)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2014-10-13
Volume
111
Issue
43
Pages
15591-15596
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1991251883
Cited by
280
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 2
FWCI
22.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Buleria (Universidad de León) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas (2012-1401, 2013‐1571)
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Oil Palm Production and Sustainability
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Keywords
Brazilian Amazon, smallholder farmers, forest fragmentation, forest degradation, agricultural census, deforestation policy, incentive-based conservation
MeSH terms
Brazil, Conservation of Natural Resources, Humans, Ecosystem, Forests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review