The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Behavioural clusters and predictors of performance during recovery from stroke
Open accessAbstract
We examined the patterns and variability of recovery post-stroke in multiple behavioral domains. A large cohort of first time stroke patients with heterogeneous lesions was studied prospectively and longitudinally at 1-2 weeks, 3 months and one year post-injury with structural MRI to measure lesion anatomy and in-depth neuropsychological assessment. Impairment was described at all timepoints by a few clusters of correlated deficits. The time course and magnitude of recovery was similar across domains, with change scores largely proportional to the initial deficit and most recovery occurring within the first three months. Damage to specific white matter tracts produced poorer recovery over several domains: attention and superior longitudinal fasciculus II/III, language and posterior arcuate fasciculus, motor and corticospinal tract. Finally, after accounting for the severity of the initial deficit, language and visual memory recovery/outcome was worse with lower education, while the occurrence of multiple deficits negatively impacted attention recovery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“It is well established that inter-individual variability in TLI in post-stroke aphasia is influenced by an array of factors, including, but not limited to, age12–15, education16–19, aphasia severity11,14,15,20,21, baseline cognitive abilities13,22,23, and, specific to bPWA, bilingual language experience and language of treatment (e.g., whether therapy is delivered in L1 or L2)24,25.”
From Machine Learning Predictions of Recovery in Bilingual Poststroke Aphasia: Aligning Insights With Clinical Evidence (2025) · cites this paper as [18]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour
Murphy, T. H., & Corbett, D. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2735 · Cited by 1,938
Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension
Dronkers, N. F., Wilkins, D. P., Van Valin, R. D., Redfern, B. B., & Jaeger, J. J. (2004) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.11.002 · Cited by 1,035
He, B. J., Snyder, A. Z., Vincent, J. L., Epstein, A. A., Shulman, G. L., & Corbetta, M. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.02.013 · Cited by 945
Self-citationA Critical Period for Enhanced Synaptic Plasticity in Newly Generated Neurons of the Adult Brain
Ge, S., Yang, C.-H., Hsu, K.-S., Ming, G.-L., & Song, H. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.05.002 · Cited by 927
Chollet, F., Tardy, J., Albucher, J.-F., Thalamas, C., Berard, E., Lamy, C., Bejot, Y., Deltour, S., Jaillard, A., Niclot, P., et al. (2011) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(10)70314-8 · Cited by 925
Mort, D. J. (2003) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awg200 · Cited by 848
Aphasia in acute stroke: Incidence, determinants, and recovery
Pedersen, P. M., Jørgensen, H. S., Nakayama, H., Raaschou, H. O., & Olsen, T. S. (1995) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410380416 · Cited by 823
Carter, A. R., Astafiev, S. V., Lang, C. E., Connor, L. T., Rengachary, J., Strube, M., Pope, D. L. W., Shulman, G. L., & Corbetta, M. (2009) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.21905 · Cited by 793
Self-citationWolff, P., & Barbey, A. K. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00001 · Cited by 788
Motor recovery after stroke: A systematic review of the literature
Hendricks, H. T., van Limbeek, J., Geurts, A. C. H., & Zwarts, M. J. (2002) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1053/apmr.2002.35473 · Cited by 782
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Carter, A. R. et al. Resting interhemispheric functional magnetic resonance imaging connectivity predicts performance after stroke. Ann. Neurol. 67, 365–375 (2010). · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Post-stroke deficit prediction from lesion and indirect structural and functional disconnection
Salvalaggio, A., Grazia, M. D. F. D., Zorzi, M., de Schotten, M. T., & Corbetta, M. (2020) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awaa156 · Cited by 285
Self-citationKarolis, V. R., Corbetta, M., & de Schotten, M. T. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09344-1 · Cited by 249
Self-citationBrain networks and their relevance for stroke rehabilitation
Guggisberg, A. G., Koch, P., Hummel, F. C., & Buetefisch, C. M. (2019) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2019.04.004 · Cited by 266
Re-emergence of modular brain networks in stroke recovery
Siegel, J. S., Seitzman, B. A., Ramsey, L., Ortega, M., Gordon, E. M., Dosenbach, N. U. F., Petersen, S. E., Shulman, G. L., & Corbetta, M. (2018) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.12.019 · Cited by 237
Self-citationStructural disconnections explain brain network dysfunction after stroke
Griffis, J. C., Metcalf, N. V., Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.07.100 · Cited by 213
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramsey, L. E., Siegel, J. S., Lang, C. E., Strube, M., Shulman, G. L., & Corbetta, M.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- University of Padua (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Ramsey, L. E.
- Venue
- Nature Human Behaviour
- Published
- 2017-02-17
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 2397-3374 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5508212
- OpenAlex
- W2588745466
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 7
- FWCI
- 17.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Human Behaviour (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS095741)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD061117)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
- Keywords
- stroke recovery, behavioural deficits, white matter tracts, attention recovery, language recovery, motor recovery, educational attainment, superior longitudinal fasciculus, corticospinal tract, recovery time course
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
