Cited by 641Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 248 of the 248 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evidence for a large-scale brain system supporting allostasis and interoception in humans

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Large-scale intrinsic brain systems have been identified for exteroceptive senses (such as sight, hearing and touch). We introduce an analogous system for representing sensations from within the body, called interoception, and demonstrate its relation to regulating peripheral systems in the body, called allostasis. Employing the recently introduced Embodied Predictive Interoception Coding (EPIC) model, we used tract-tracing studies of macaque monkeys, followed by two intrinsic functional magnetic resonance imaging samples (N = 280 and N = 270) to evaluate the existence of an intrinsic allostatic–interoceptive system in the human brain. Another sample (N = 41) allowed us to evaluate the convergent validity of the hypothesized allostatic–interoceptive system by showing that individuals with stronger connectivity between system hubs performed better on an implicit index of interoceptive ability related to autonomic fluctuations. Implications include insights for the brain’s functional architecture, dissolving the artificial boundary between mind and body, and unifying mental and physical illness.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41562-017-0069

Cites

248 of 248 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Items 201–248 of 248

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Sherrington, C. in Textbook of Physiology (ed. Schäfer, E. A. ) 920–1001 (Pentland, 1900).
  2. Clark-Polner, E., Wager, T. D., Satpute, A. B. & Barrett, L. F. in The Handbook of Emotion (eds Barrett, L. F., Lewis, M. & Haviland-Jones, J. M. ) 146–165 (Guilford Press, 2016).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 641

Metadata

Authors
Kleckner, I. R., Zhang, J., Touroutoglou, A., Chanes, L., Xia, C., Simmons, W. K., Quigley, K. S., Dickerson, B. C., & Feldman Barrett, L.
Affiliations
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Laureate Institute for Brain Research (US)
Corresponding author
Kleckner, Ian R.
Venue
Nature Human Behaviour
Published
2017-04-24
Volume
1
Issue
5
ISSN
2397-3374 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2949653992
Cited by
641
References
248
Citations by year
2026: 80 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 83 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 20
FWCI
30.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Human Behaviour (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG030311)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (F32MH096533, K01MH096175)
  • National Cancer Institute (R25CA102618, U01CA193632, UG1CA189961)
  • Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences (W5J9CQ-11-C-0046, W5J9CQ-12-C-0049)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
allostasis, interoception, brain connectivity, convergent validity, mind-body problem, brain functional architecture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review