Cited by 104Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Subjective confidence reflects representation of Bayesian probability in cortex

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

What gives rise to the human sense of confidence? Here we tested the Bayesian hypothesis that confidence is based on a probability distribution represented in neural population activity. We implemented several computational models of confidence and tested their predictions using psychophysics and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Using a generative model-based decoding technique, we extracted probability distributions from neural population activity in human visual cortex. We found that subjective confidence tracks the shape of the decoded distribution. That is, when sensory evidence was more precise, as indicated by the decoded distribution, observers reported higher levels of confidence. We furthermore found that neural activity in the insula, anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex was linked to both the shape of the decoded distribution and reported confidence, in ways consistent with the Bayesian model. Altogether, our findings support recent statistical theories of confidence and suggest that probabilistic information guides the computation of one's sense of confidence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41562-021-01247-w

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 77 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Green, D. M. & Swets, J. A. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics (Wiley, 1966).
  2. Kleiner, M., Brainard, D. H. & Pelli, D. G. What’s new in Psychtoolbox-3? Perception 36 (Suppl.), 14 (2007).
  3. Hedges, L. V. & Olkin, I. Statistical Methods for Meta-analysis (Academic Press, 1985).
  4. Fieller, E. C. & Pearson, E. S. Tests for rank correlation coefficients: II. Biometrika 48, 29–40 (1961).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 104

Metadata

Authors
Geurts, L. S., Cooke, J. R. H., van Bergen, R. S., & Jehee, J. F. M.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Jehee, Janneke F. M.
Venue
Nature Human Behaviour
Published
2022-01-20
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
294-305
ISSN
2397-3374 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220816838
Cited by
104
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 9
FWCI
10.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Human Behaviour (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Keywords
subjective confidence, Bayesian probability, neural population activity, visual cortex, insula, anterior cingulate cortex, prefrontal cortex, confidence model, decision-making
MeSH terms
Bayes Theorem, Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Probability, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review