Cited by 349Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural MechanismsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference

Confidence as Bayesian probability: From neural origins to behavior

Open access
Meyniel, Florent, Sigman, Mariano, Mainen, Zachary F.·2015·Neuron

Abstract

Research on confidence spreads across several sub-fields of psychology and neuroscience. Here, we explore how a definition of confidence as Bayesian probability can unify these viewpoints. This computational view entails that there are distinct forms in which confidence is represented and used in the brain, including distributional confidence, pertaining to neural representations of probability distributions, and summary confidence, pertaining to scalar summaries of those distributions. Summary confidence is, normatively, derived or "read out" from distributional confidence. Neural implementations of readout will trade off optimality versus flexibility of routing across brain systems, allowing confidence to serve diverse cognitive functions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.039

Cites

134 of 134 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Propositional confidence can be distinguished from other confidences or uncertainties inherent to perception, cognition, and action, although the latter often inform the former.

    “The most important idea, building on the work of Pouget et al. (2016), is that propositional confidence can be distinguished from a myriad of other confidences or uncertainties that are inherent to perception, cognition, and action, although the latter often inform the former (Meyniel et al. 2015).”

    From Metacognition and Confidence: A Review and Synthesis (2024) · cites this paper as Meyniel et al. 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Kahneman, D. (2013). Thinking, Fast and Slow (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux). http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0896-6273(1500828-4/sref57)
  2. Shea,N., Boldt, A., Bang, D., Yeung, N., Heyes, C., and Frith, C.D. (2014). Suprapersonal cognitive control and metacognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 18 , 186-193. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0896-6273(1500828-4/sref103)
  3. Yeung, N., and Summerfield, C. (2012). Metacognition in human decisionmaking: confidence and error monitoring. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 367 , 1310-1321. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0896-6273(1500828-4/sref123)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meyniel, F., Sigman, M., & Mainen, Z. F.
Affiliations
  • Université Paris-Sud (FR)
  • Universidad Torcuato Di Tella (AR)
  • Centro Champalimaud (PT)
Corresponding author
Meyniel, Florent
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
88
Issue
1
Pages
78-92
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1939692617
Cited by
349
References
134
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 20
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • Simons Foundation
  • European Commission (604102)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Keywords
confidence, Bayesian probability, decision-making, cognitive flexibility, normative model
MeSH terms
Animals, Bayes Theorem, Brain, Cognition, Decision Making, Humans, Models, Psychological, Probability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review