Cited by 29Bacteriophages and microbial interactionsinterferon and immune responsesBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phage defence system CBASS is regulated by a prokaryotic E2 enzyme that imitates the ubiquitin pathway

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The cyclic-oligonucleotide-based anti-phage signalling system (CBASS) is a type of innate prokaryotic immune system. Composed of a cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) and CBASS-associated proteins, CBASS uses cyclic oligonucleotides to activate antiviral immunity. One major class of CBASS contains a homologue of eukaryotic ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes, which is either an E1-E2 fusion or a single E2. However, the functions of single E2s in CBASS remain elusive. Here, using biochemical, genetic, cryo-electron microscopy and mass spectrometry investigations, we discover that the E2 enzyme from Serratia marcescens regulates cGAS by imitating the ubiquitination cascade. This includes the processing of the cGAS C terminus, conjugation of cGAS to a cysteine residue, ligation of cGAS to a lysine residue, cleavage of the isopeptide bond and poly-cGASylation. The poly-cGASylation activates cGAS to produce cGAMP, which acts as an antiviral signal and leads to cell death. Thus, our findings reveal a unique regulatory role of E2 in CBASS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41564-024-01684-z

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. Sun, L., Wu, J., Du, F., Chen, X. & Chen, Z. J. Cyclic GMP–AMP synthase is a cytosolic DNA sensor that activates the type I interferon pathway. Science 339, 786–791 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Wu, J. et al. Cyclic GMP–AMP is an endogenous second messenger in innate immune signaling by cytosolic DNA. Science 339, 826–830 (2013). · DOI
  3. Davies, B. W., Bogard, R. W., Young, T. S. & Mekalanos, J. J. Coordinated regulation of accessory genetic elements produces cyclic di-nucleotides for V. cholerae virulence. Cell 149, 358–370 (2012). · DOI
  4. Kranzusch, P. J., Lee, A. S., Berger, J. M. & Doudna, J. A. Structure of human cGAS reveals a conserved family of second-messenger enzymes in innate immunity. Cell Rep. 3, 1362–1368 (2013). · DOI
  5. Whiteley, A. T. et al. Bacterial cGAS-like enzymes synthesize diverse nucleotide signals. Nature 567, 194–199 (2019). · DOI
  6. Cohen, D. et al. Cyclic GMP–AMP signalling protects bacteria against viral infection. Nature 574, 691–695 (2019). · DOI
  7. Morehouse, B. R. et al. STING cyclic dinucleotide sensing originated in bacteria. Nature 586, 429–433 (2020). · DOI
  8. Ye, Q. et al. HORMA domain proteins and a Trip13-like ATPase regulate bacterial cGAS-like enzymes to mediate bacteriophage immunity. Mol. Cell 77, 709–722.e7 (2020). · DOI
  9. Burroughs, A. M., Zhang, D., Schaffer, D. E., Iyer, L. M. & Aravind, L. Comparative genomic analyses reveal a vast, novel network of nucleotide-centric systems in biological conflicts, immunity and signaling. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, 10633–10654 (2015). · DOI
  10. Millman, A., Melamed, S., Amitai, G. & Sorek, R. Diversity and classification of cyclic-oligonucleotide-based anti-phage signalling systems. Nat. Microbiol. 5, 1608–1615 (2020). · DOI
  11. Lowey, B. et al. CBASS immunity uses CARF-related effectors to sense 3′–5′- and 2′–5′-linked cyclic oligonucleotide signals and protect bacteria from phage infection. Cell 182, 38–49.e17 (2020). · DOI
  12. Kerscher, O., Felberbaum, R. & Hochstrasser, M. Modification of proteins by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 22, 159–180 (2006). · DOI
  13. Li, W. & Ye, Y. Polyubiquitin chains: functions, structures, and mechanisms. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 65, 2397–2406 (2008). · DOI
  14. Ledvina, H. E. et al. An E1–E2 fusion protein primes antiviral immune signalling in bacteria. Nature 616, 319–325 (2023). · DOI · Paper page
  15. Jenson, J. M., Li, T., Du, F., Ea, C. K. & Chen, Z. J. Ubiquitin-like conjugation by bacterial cGAS enhances anti-phage defence. Nature 616, 326–331 (2023). · DOI
  16. Mirdita, M. & Schütze, K. ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all. Nat. Methods 19, 679–682 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  17. Holm, L., Laiho, A., Törönen, P. & Salgado, M. DALI shines a light on remote homologs: one hundred discoveries. Protein Sci. 32, e4519 (2023). · DOI
  18. Dou, H., Buetow, L., Sibbet, G. J., Cameron, K. & Huang, D. T. BIRC7–E2 ubiquitin conjugate structure reveals the mechanism of ubiquitin transfer by a RING dimer. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 876–883 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  19. Termathe, M. & Leidel, S. A. The Uba4 domain interplay is mediated via a thioester that is critical for tRNA thiolation through Urm1 thiocarboxylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 5171–5181 (2018). · DOI
  20. Hendrickx, A. P., Budzik, J. M., Oh, S. Y. & Schneewind, O. Architects at the bacterial surface—sortases and the assembly of pili with isopeptide bonds. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 166–176 (2011). · DOI
  21. Jacobitz, A. W., Kattke, M. D., Wereszczynski, J. & Clubb, R. T. Sortase transpeptidases: structural biology and catalytic mechanism. Adv. Protein Chem. Struct. Biol. 109, 223–264 (2017). · DOI
  22. Lowther, J. et al. The importance of pH in regulating the function of the Fasciola hepatica cathepsin L1 cysteine protease. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 3, e369 (2009). · DOI
  23. Zhao, L. et al. Structural analysis of asparaginyl endopeptidase reveals the activation mechanism and a reversible intermediate maturation stage. Cell Res. 24, 344–358 (2014). · DOI
  24. Verma, S., Dixit, R. & Pandey, K. C. Cysteine proteases: modes of activation and future prospects as pharmacological targets. Front. Pharmacol. 7, 107 (2016). · DOI
  25. Elsässer, B. et al. Distinct roles of catalytic cysteine and histidine in the protease and ligase mechanisms of human legumain as revealed by DFT-based QM/MM simulations. ACS Catal. 7, 5585–5593 (2017). · DOI
  26. Feliciangeli, S. F. et al. Identification of a pH sensor in the furin propeptide that regulates enzyme activation. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 16108–16116 (2006). · DOI
  27. Williamson, D. M., Elferich, J., Ramakrishnan, P., Thomas, G. & Shinde, U. The mechanism by which a propeptide-encoded pH sensor regulates spatiotemporal activation of furin. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 19154–19165 (2013). · DOI
  28. Vernet, T. et al. Processing of the papain precursor. The ionization state of a conserved amino acid motif within the Pro region participates in the regulation of intramolecular processing. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 10838–10846 (1995). · DOI
  29. Fuentes-Prior, P. & Salvesen, G. S. The protein structures that shape caspase activity, specificity, activation and inhibition. Biochem. J. 384, 201–232 (2004). · DOI
  30. Li, X. et al. Cyclic GMP–AMP synthase is activated by double-stranded DNA-induced oligomerization. Immunity 39, 1019–1031 (2013). · DOI
  31. Yu, L. & Liu, P. Cytosolic DNA sensing by cGAS: regulation, function, and human diseases. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 6, 170 (2021). · DOI
  32. Duncan-Lowey, B., McNamara-Bordewick, N. K., Tal, N., Sorek, R. & Kranzusch, P. J. Effector-mediated membrane disruption controls cell death in CBASS antiphage defense. Mol. Cell 81, 5039–5051.e5035 (2021). · DOI
  33. David, Y., Ziv, T., Admon, A. & Navon, A. The E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes direct polyubiquitination to preferred lysines. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 8595–8604 (2010). · DOI
  34. Stewart, M. D., Ritterhoff, T., Klevit, R. E. & Brzovic, P. S. E2 enzymes: more than just middle men. Cell Res. 26, 423–440 (2016). · DOI
  35. Burroughs, A. M., Jaffee, M., Iyer, L. M. & Aravind, L. Anatomy of the E2 ligase fold: implications for enzymology and evolution of ubiquitin/Ub-like protein conjugation. J. Struct. Biol. 162, 205–218 (2008). · DOI
  36. Pearce, M. J., Mintseris, J., Ferreyra, J., Gygi, S. P. & Darwin, K. H. Ubiquitin-like protein involved in the proteasome pathway of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science 322, 1104–1107 (2008). · DOI
  37. Burns, K. E. et al. “Depupylation” of prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein from mycobacterial proteasome substrates. Mol. Cell 39, 821–827 (2010). · DOI
  38. Iyer, L. M., Burroughs, A. M. & Aravind, L. Unraveling the biochemistry and provenance of pupylation: a prokaryotic analog of ubiquitination. Biol. Direct 3, 45 (2008). · DOI
  39. Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  40. Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017). · DOI
  41. Bepler, T. et al. Positive-unlabeled convolutional neural networks for particle picking in cryo-electron micrographs. Nat. Methods 16, 1153–1160 (2019). · DOI
  42. Zivanov, J., Nakane, T. & Scheres, S. H. W. A Bayesian approach to beam-induced motion correction in cryo-EM single-particle analysis. IUCrJ 6, 5–17 (2019). · DOI
  43. Punjani, A., Zhang, H. & Fleet, D. J. Non-uniform refinement: adaptive regularization improves single-particle cryo-EM reconstruction. Nat. Methods 17, 1214–1221 (2020). · DOI
  44. Punjani, A. & Fleet, D. J. 3D variability analysis: resolving continuous flexibility and discrete heterogeneity from single particle cryo-EM. J. Struct. Biol. 213, 107702 (2021). · DOI
  45. Sanchez-Garcia, R. et al. DeepEMhancer: a deep learning solution for cryo-EM volume post-processing. Commun. Biol. 4, 874 (2021). · DOI
  46. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021). · DOI
  47. Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D. 66, 486–501 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  48. Wang Ray, Y.-R. et al. Automated structure refinement of macromolecular assemblies from cryo-EM maps using Rosetta. eLife 5, e17219 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  49. Liebschner, D., Afonine, P. V., Baker, M. L., Bunkóczi, G. & Adams, P. D. Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix. Acta Crystallogr. D. 75, 861–877 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  50. Leman, J. K. et al. Macromolecular modeling and design in Rosetta: recent methods and frameworks. Nat. Methods 17, 665–680 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  51. Hu, M., Liu, Y., Yu, K. & Liu, X. Decreasing the amount of trypsin in in-gel digestion leads to diminished chemical noise and improved protein identifications. J. Proteomics 109, 16–25 (2014). · DOI
  52. Mazzocco, A., Waddell, T. E., Lingohr, E. & Johnson, R. P. Enumeration of bacteriophages using the small drop plaque assay system. Methods Mol. Biol. 501, 81–85 (2009). · DOI
  53. Chakraborty, S., Mizusaki, H. & Kenney, L. J. A FRET-based DNA biosensor tracks OmpR-dependent acidification of Salmonella during macrophage infection. PLoS Biol. 13, e1002116 (2015). · DOI
  54. Burgstaller, S. et al. pH-Lemon, a fluorescent protein-based pH reporter for acidic compartments. ACS Sens. 4, 883–891 (2019). · DOI
  55. Ma, J. et al. iProX: an integrated proteome resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D1211–d1217 (2019). · DOI
  56. Chen, T. & Ma, J. iProX in 2021: connecting proteomics data sharing with big data. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D1522–d1527 (2022). · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Yan, Y., Xiao, J., Huang, F., Xian, W., Yu, B., Cheng, R., Wu, H., Lu, X., Wang, X., Huang, W., Li, J., Oyejobi, G. K., Robinson, C. V., Wu, H., Wu, D., Liu, X., Wang, L., & Zhu, B.
Affiliations
  • Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Wuhan University (CN)
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Huang, Fengtao
  • Wu, Di
  • Liu, Xiaoyun
  • Wang, Longfei
  • Zhu, Bin
Venue
Nature Microbiology
Published
2024-04-22
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
1566-1578
ISSN
2058-5276 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4395010496
Cited by
29
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 6
FWCI
7.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (32150009, 31870165, 31900032, 22174003, 21974002)
  • Science, Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › interferon and immune responses
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
C-BASS, cGAS, E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, Serratia marcescens, cGAMP, antiviral innate immunity, phage defense, cell death
MeSH terms
Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate-Adenosine Monophosphate Synthase, Bacterial Proteins, Bacteriophages, Humans, Immunity, Innate, Nucleotides, Cyclic, Nucleotidyltransferases, Signal Transduction, Cryoelectron Microscopy, Ubiquitin, Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzymes, Ubiquitination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review