The DOI matches its Crossref record; 227 of the 227 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intratumoural administration and tumour tissue targeting of cancer immunotherapies
Open accessAbstract
Immune-checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are revolutionizing oncology and haematology practice. With these and other immunotherapies, however, systemic biodistribution raises safety issues, potentially requiring the use of suboptimal doses or even precluding their clinical development. Delivering or attracting immune cells or immunomodulatory factors directly to the tumour and/or draining lymph nodes might overcome these problems. Hence, intratumoural delivery and tumour tissue-targeted compounds are attractive options to increase the in situ bioavailability and, thus, the efficacy of immunotherapies. In mouse models, intratumoural administration of immunostimulatory monoclonal antibodies, pattern recognition receptor agonists, genetically engineered viruses, bacteria, cytokines or immune cells can exert powerful effects not only against the injected tumours but also often against uninjected lesions (abscopal or anenestic effects). Alternatively, or additionally, biotechnology strategies are being used to achieve higher functional concentrations of immune mediators in tumour tissues, either by targeting locally overexpressed moieties or engineering ‘unmaskable’ agents to be activated by elements enriched within tumour tissues. Clinical trials evaluating these strategies are ongoing, but their development faces issues relating to the administration methodology, pharmacokinetic parameters, pharmacodynamic end points, and immunobiological and clinical response assessments. Herein, we discuss these approaches in the context of their historical development and describe the current landscape of intratumoural or tumour tissue-targeted immunotherapies. Limited penetration into tumour tissue can restrict the activity of systemically delivered cancer immunotherapies, whereas exposure of various non-malignant tissues to high levels of such agents can lead to problematic toxicities. Intratumoural administration and/or biotechnology strategies for selective targeting of tumour tissues have the potential to circumvent these issues and thereby increase the therapeutic index. Herein, the authors review the historical origins and current landscape of intratumoural and tumour tissue-targeted immunotherapies. Repeated intratumoural injections with agents designed to enhance antitumour immune responses constitutes a feasible strategy to reduce the risk of systemic toxicities and achieve higher local bioactive drug concentrations. Spearheaded by the oncolytic virus talimogene laheparepvec, the first intratumoural immunotherapy approved by the FDA and EMA, and supported by a strong preclinical rationale, many intratumoural immunotherapies are now being developed in clinical trials. These immunotherapies include microorganisms (viruses or bacteria) and synthetic compounds mimicking infectious agents (such as pattern recognition receptor agonists), as well as immunomodulatory monoclonal antibodies, cytokines and chimeric proteins. Higher locoregional concentrations of immunotherapy agents can also be achieved through molecular engineering, for example, to target them towards moieties that are enriched in the tumour microenvironment. Increased specificity in tumour targeting can also be attained through the development of prodrug forms of immunotherapies that become functional only after entering tumour tissue (pro-immunodrugs). Procedural, pharmaceutical, regulatory and analytical challenges require multidisciplinary expert consensus and systematic research to maximize the potential of these modes of administration. Repeated intratumoural injections with agents designed to enhance antitumour immune responses constitutes a feasible strategy to reduce the risk of systemic toxicities and achieve higher local bioactive drug concentrations. Spearheaded by the oncolytic virus talimogene laheparepvec, the first intratumoural immunotherapy approved by the FDA and EMA, and supported by a strong preclinical rationale, many intratumoural immunotherapies are now being developed in clinical trials. These immunotherapies include microorganisms (viruses or bacteria) and synthetic compounds mimicking infectious agents (such as pattern recognition receptor agonists), as well as immunomodulatory monoclonal antibodies, cytokines and chimeric proteins. Higher locoregional concentrations of immunotherapy agents can also be achieved through molecular engineering, for example, to target them towards moieties that are enriched in the tumour microenvironment. Increased specificity in tumour targeting can also be attained through the development of prodrug forms of immunotherapies that become functional only after entering tumour tissue (pro-immunodrugs). Procedural, pharmaceutical, regulatory and analytical challenges require multidisciplinary expert consensus and systematic research to maximize the potential of these modes of administration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Defective LPS Signaling in C3H/HeJ and C57BL/10ScCr Mice: Mutations in Tlr4 Gene
Poltorak, A., He, X., Smirnova, I., Liu, M.-Y., Huffel, C. V., Du, X., Birdwell, D., Alejos, E., Silva, M., Galanos, C., et al. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.282.5396.2085 · Cited by 7,631
Oncology meets immunology: the cancer-immunity cycle.
Chen, D. S., & Mellman, I. (2013) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2013.07.012 · Cited by 6,929
Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade
Ribas, A., & Wolchok, J. D. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aar4060 · Cited by 6,791
Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer
Gandhi, L., Rodríguez-Abreu, D., Gadgeel, S., Esteban, E., Felip, E., De Angelis, F., Domine, M., Clingan, P., Hochmair, M. J., Powell, S. F., et al. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1801005 · Cited by 6,607
A Toll-like receptor recognizes bacterial DNA
Hemmi, H., Takeuchi, O., Kawai, T., Kaisho, T., Sato, S., Sanjo, H., Matsumoto, M., Hoshino, K., Wagner, H., Takeda, K., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35047123 · Cited by 6,491
Recognition of double-stranded RNA and activation of NF-κB by Toll-like receptor 3
Alexopoulou, L., Holt, A. C., Medzhitov, R., & Flavell, R. A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35099560 · Cited by 6,129
Immune-Related Adverse Events Associated with Immune Checkpoint Blockade
Postow, M. A., Sidlow, R., & Hellmann, M. D. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1703481 · Cited by 4,849
Innate antiviral responses by means of TLR7-mediated recognition of single-stranded RNA
Diebold, S. S., Kaisho, T., Hemmi, H., Akira, S., & Reis e Sousa, C. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1093616 · Cited by 3,444
Burtness, B., Harrington, K. J., Greil, R., Soulières, D., Tahara, M., de Castro, G., Psyrri, A., Basté, N., Neupane, P., Bratland, Å., et al. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32591-7 · Cited by 3,336
Immunogenic Cell Death in Cancer Therapy
Kroemer, G., Galluzzi, L., Kepp, O., & Zitvogel, L. (2013) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-032712-100008 · Cited by 3,303
Cited by
Cancer vaccines: the next immunotherapy frontier
Lin, M. J., Svensson-Arvelund, J., Lubitz, G. S., Marabelle, A., Melero, I., Brown, B. D., & Brody, J. D. (2022) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-022-00418-6 · Cited by 843
Self-citationHuang, Q., Wu, X., Wang, Z., Chen, X., Wang, L., Lu, Y., Xiong, D., Liu, Q., Tian, Y., Lin, H., et al. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.09.020 · Cited by 486
Chemical and Biomolecular Strategies for STING Pathway Activation in Cancer Immunotherapy
Garland, K. M., Sheehy, T. L., & Wilson, J. T. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00750 · Cited by 357
Hasan, N., Nadaf, A., Imran, M., Jiba, U., Sheikh, A., Almalki, W. H., Almujri, S. S., Mohammed, Y. H., Kesharwani, P., & Ahmad, F. J. (2023) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-023-01854-3 · Cited by 322
Biosafety of mesoporous silica nanoparticles; towards clinical translation
Lérida-Viso, A., Estepa-Fernández, A., García-Fernández, A., Martí-Centelles, V., & Martínez-Máñez, R. (2023) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2023.115049 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Melero, I., Castanon, E., Alvarez, M., Champiat, S., & Marabelle, A.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2021-05-18
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 558-576
- ISSN
- 1759-4774 (ISSN-L)
- 1759-4782
- OpenAlex
- W3160126603
- Cited by
- 493
- References
- 227
- FWCI
- 12.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intratumoural administration and tumour tissue targeting of cancer immunotherapies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41571-021-00507-y
- The paper
- Melero, I., Castanon, E., Alvarez, M., Champiat, S., & Marabelle, A. (2021). Intratumoural administration and tumour tissue targeting of cancer immunotherapies. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-021-00507-y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.