Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 493

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 227 of the 227 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intratumoural administration and tumour tissue targeting of cancer immunotherapies

Open access
Melero, Ignacio, Castanon, Eduardo, Alvarez, Maite, Champiat, Stephane, Marabelle, Aurelien·2021·Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are revolutionizing oncology and haematology practice. With these and other immunotherapies, however, systemic biodistribution raises safety issues, potentially requiring the use of suboptimal doses or even precluding their clinical development. Delivering or attracting immune cells or immunomodulatory factors directly to the tumour and/or draining lymph nodes might overcome these problems. Hence, intratumoural delivery and tumour tissue-targeted compounds are attractive options to increase the in situ bioavailability and, thus, the efficacy of immunotherapies. In mouse models, intratumoural administration of immunostimulatory monoclonal antibodies, pattern recognition receptor agonists, genetically engineered viruses, bacteria, cytokines or immune cells can exert powerful effects not only against the injected tumours but also often against uninjected lesions (abscopal or anenestic effects). Alternatively, or additionally, biotechnology strategies are being used to achieve higher functional concentrations of immune mediators in tumour tissues, either by targeting locally overexpressed moieties or engineering ‘unmaskable’ agents to be activated by elements enriched within tumour tissues. Clinical trials evaluating these strategies are ongoing, but their development faces issues relating to the administration methodology, pharmacokinetic parameters, pharmacodynamic end points, and immunobiological and clinical response assessments. Herein, we discuss these approaches in the context of their historical development and describe the current landscape of intratumoural or tumour tissue-targeted immunotherapies. Limited penetration into tumour tissue can restrict the activity of systemically delivered cancer immunotherapies, whereas exposure of various non-malignant tissues to high levels of such agents can lead to problematic toxicities. Intratumoural administration and/or biotechnology strategies for selective targeting of tumour tissues have the potential to circumvent these issues and thereby increase the therapeutic index. Herein, the authors review the historical origins and current landscape of intratumoural and tumour tissue-targeted immunotherapies. Repeated intratumoural injections with agents designed to enhance antitumour immune responses constitutes a feasible strategy to reduce the risk of systemic toxicities and achieve higher local bioactive drug concentrations. Spearheaded by the oncolytic virus talimogene laheparepvec, the first intratumoural immunotherapy approved by the FDA and EMA, and supported by a strong preclinical rationale, many intratumoural immunotherapies are now being developed in clinical trials. These immunotherapies include microorganisms (viruses or bacteria) and synthetic compounds mimicking infectious agents (such as pattern recognition receptor agonists), as well as immunomodulatory monoclonal antibodies, cytokines and chimeric proteins. Higher locoregional concentrations of immunotherapy agents can also be achieved through molecular engineering, for example, to target them towards moieties that are enriched in the tumour microenvironment. Increased specificity in tumour targeting can also be attained through the development of prodrug forms of immunotherapies that become functional only after entering tumour tissue (pro-immunodrugs). Procedural, pharmaceutical, regulatory and analytical challenges require multidisciplinary expert consensus and systematic research to maximize the potential of these modes of administration. Repeated intratumoural injections with agents designed to enhance antitumour immune responses constitutes a feasible strategy to reduce the risk of systemic toxicities and achieve higher local bioactive drug concentrations. Spearheaded by the oncolytic virus talimogene laheparepvec, the first intratumoural immunotherapy approved by the FDA and EMA, and supported by a strong preclinical rationale, many intratumoural immunotherapies are now being developed in clinical trials. These immunotherapies include microorganisms (viruses or bacteria) and synthetic compounds mimicking infectious agents (such as pattern recognition receptor agonists), as well as immunomodulatory monoclonal antibodies, cytokines and chimeric proteins. Higher locoregional concentrations of immunotherapy agents can also be achieved through molecular engineering, for example, to target them towards moieties that are enriched in the tumour microenvironment. Increased specificity in tumour targeting can also be attained through the development of prodrug forms of immunotherapies that become functional only after entering tumour tissue (pro-immunodrugs). Procedural, pharmaceutical, regulatory and analytical challenges require multidisciplinary expert consensus and systematic research to maximize the potential of these modes of administration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41571-021-00507-y

Cites

227 of 227 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 227 references

Cited by

See all 493

Metadata

Authors
Melero, I., Castanon, E., Alvarez, M., Champiat, S., & Marabelle, A.
Venue
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
Published
2021-05-18
Volume
18
Issue
9
Pages
558-576
ISSN
  • 1759-4774 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-4782
OpenAlex
W3160126603
Cited by
493
References
227
FWCI
12.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intratumoural administration and tumour tissue targeting of cancer immunotherapies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41571-021-00507-y
The paper
Melero, I., Castanon, E., Alvarez, M., Champiat, S., & Marabelle, A. (2021). Intratumoural administration and tumour tissue targeting of cancer immunotherapies. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-021-00507-y

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.