Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 709

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 163 of the 163 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genetic and molecular epidemiology of adult diffuse glioma

Open access
Molinaro, Annette M., Taylor, Jennie W., Wiencke, John K., Wrensch, Margaret R.·2019·Nature Reviews Neurology

Abstract

The WHO 2007 glioma classification system (based primarily on tumour histology) resulted in considerable interobserver variability and substantial variation in patient survival within grades. Furthermore, few risk factors for glioma were known. Discoveries over the past decade have deepened our understanding of the molecular alterations underlying glioma and have led to the identification of numerous genetic risk factors. The advances in molecular characterization of glioma have reframed our understanding of its biology and led to the development of a new classification system for glioma. The WHO 2016 classification system comprises five glioma subtypes, categorized by both tumour morphology and molecular genetic information, which led to reduced misclassification and improved consistency of outcomes within glioma subtypes. To date, 25 risk loci for glioma have been identified and several rare inherited mutations that might cause glioma in some families have been discovered. This Review focuses on the two dominant trends in glioma science: the characterization of diagnostic and prognostic tumour markers and the identification of genetic and other risk factors. An overview of the many challenges still facing glioma researchers is also included.In this Review of adult diffuse gliomas, Molinaro et al. discuss the latest epidemiological data and highlight advances from the past decade, including the identification of genetic and other risk factors for glioma included in the 2016 WHO integrated classification system.Key pointsGlioma incidence differs by age, sex, ethnicity and geography whereas glioma survival varies by tumour subtype, age and sex.In the past decade, multiple discoveries have expanded our understanding of glioma and led to a new classification system (WHO 2016) that integrates molecular alterations and histology.The WHO 2016 classification system defines five glioma subtypes that have improved homogeneity in their clinical outcomes.Twenty-five risk loci for glioma and several rare inherited mutations that might cause glioma in some families have been identified; however, ionizing radiation is the only confirmed environmental risk factor.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41582-019-0220-2

Cites

163 of 163 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 163 references

Cited by

See all 709

Metadata

Authors
Molinaro, A. M., Taylor, J. W., Wiencke, J. K., & Wrensch, M. R.
Venue
Nature Reviews Neurology
Published
2019-06-21
Volume
15
Issue
7
Pages
405-417
ISSN
  • 1759-4758 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-4766
OpenAlex
W2953298857
Cited by
709
References
163
FWCI
15.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic and molecular epidemiology of adult diffuse glioma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41582-019-0220-2
The paper
Molinaro, A. M., Taylor, J. W., Wiencke, J. K., & Wrensch, M. R. (2019). Genetic and molecular epidemiology of adult diffuse glioma. Nature Reviews Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-019-0220-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.