Cited by 593Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans researchNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 228 of the 228 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The roles of perineuronal nets and the perinodal extracellular matrix in neuronal function

Fawcett, James W., Oohashi, Toshitaka, Pizzorusso, Tommaso·2019·Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Abstract

Perineuronal nets (PNNs) are extracellular matrix (ECM) chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan (CSPG)-containing structures that surround the soma and dendrites of various mammalian neuronal cell types. PNNs appear during development around the time that the critical periods for developmental plasticity end and are important for both their onset and closure. A similar structure - the perinodal ECM - surrounds the axonal nodes of Ranvier and appears as myelination is completed, acting as an ion-diffusion barrier that affects axonal conduction speed. Recent work has revealed the importance of PNNs in controlling plasticity in the CNS. Digestion, blocking or removal of PNNs influences functional recovery after a variety of CNS lesions. PNNs have further been shown to be involved in the regulation of memory and have been implicated in a number of psychiatric disorders.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41583-019-0196-3

Cites

228 of 228 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 228 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 593

Metadata

Authors
Fawcett, J. W., Oohashi, T., & Pizzorusso, T.
Affiliations
  • Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ)
  • Okayama University (JP)
  • Neuroscience Institute (IT)
Corresponding author
Fawcett, James W.
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2019-07-01
Volume
20
Issue
8
Pages
451-465
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W2955918581
Cited by
589
References
228
Citations by year
2026: 85 · 2025: 114 · 2024: 89 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 9
FWCI
6.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
  • Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council (MR/R004463/1, MR/R004544/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
perineuronal nets, chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans, extracellular matrix, critical period, developmental plasticity, CNS plasticity, memory regulation, mental illness, nodes of Ranvier, myelination
MeSH terms
Animals, Mental Disorders, Central Nervous System Diseases, Extracellular Matrix, Humans, Memory, Models, Neurological, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review