Cited by 834Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsCerebrovascular and genetic disorders

Genome-wide association studies of brain imaging phenotypes in UK Biobank

Open access
Elliott, Lloyd T., Sharp, Kevin, Alfaro-Almagro, Fidel, Shi, Sinan, Miller, Karla L., Douaud, Gwenaëlle, Marchini, Jonathan, Smith, Stephen M.·2018·Nature

Abstract

The genetic architecture of brain structure and function is largely unknown. To investigate this, we carried out genome-wide association studies of 3,144 functional and structural brain imaging phenotypes from UK Biobank (discovery dataset 8,428 subjects). Here we show that many of these phenotypes are heritable. We identify 148 clusters of associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms and imaging phenotypes that replicate at P < 0.05, when we would expect 21 to replicate by chance. Notable significant, interpretable associations include: iron transport and storage genes, related to magnetic susceptibility of subcortical brain tissue; extracellular matrix and epidermal growth factor genes, associated with white matter micro-structure and lesions; genes that regulate mid-line axon development, associated with organization of the pontine crossing tract; and overall 17 genes involved in development, pathway signalling and plasticity. Our results provide insights into the genetic architecture of the brain that are relevant to neurological and psychiatric disorders, brain development and ageing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-018-0571-7

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Genetic factors contributed moderately significantly to brain cortical area including the ROI superior temporal area (h2 = 0.261, 95% CI 0.220-0.301).

    “genetic factors contributed moderately significantly to brain cortical area (also measured in FreeSurfer.aparc.2009s atlas) (Elliott et al., 2018) including the ROI superior temporal area ( h 2 : 0.261, 95% CI 0.220 -0.301)”

    From Early-Initiated Childhood Reading for Pleasure: Associations with Better Cognitive Performance, Mental Well-being and Brain Structure in Young Adolescence (2024) · cites this paper as Elliott et al., 2018

    The Methods section (page unavailable) says the study measured cortical parcel area using FreeSurfer’s a2009s atlas, and ‘Heritability and genetic correlations of IDPs’ reports significant SNP-heritability for many imaging phenotypes. Our copy does not substantiate the specific superior temporal area estimate of h² = 0.261 or its 95% confidence interval of 0.220–0.301. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. [1]Brain Mapping: An Encyclopedic Reference Elsevier 2015
  2. [2]Sudlow C UK Biobank: An Open Access Resource for Identifying the Causes of a Wide Range of Complex Diseases of Middle and Old Age PLOS Medicine 2015 12 e1001779 25826379 PMC4380465
  3. [5]Alfaro-Almagro F Image processing and Quality Control for the first 10,000 brain imaging datasets from UK Biobank Neuroimage 2018 166 400 424 29079522 PMC5770339
  4. [6]Bycroft C The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data Nature 2018 PMC6786975 30305743
  5. [7]Hibar DP Common genetic variants influence human subcortical brain structures Nature 2015 520 224 229 25607358 PMC4393366
  6. [9]Shen L Whole genome association study of brain-wide imaging phenotypes for identifying quantitative trait loci in MCI and AD: A study of the ADNI cohort Neuroimage 2010 53 1051 1063 20100581 PMC2892122
  7. [10]Koran ME Impact of family structure and common environment on heritability estimation for neuroimaging genetics studies using Sequential Oligogenic Linkage Analysis Routines JMIOBU 2014 1 014005 PMC4281883 25558465
  8. [11]Colclough GL The heritability of multi-modal connectivity in human brain activity Elife 2017 6 e20178 28745584 PMC5621837
  9. [12]Roalf DR Heritability of subcortical and limbic brain volume and shape in multiplex-multigenerational families with schizophrenia Biol Psychiatry 2015 77 137 146 24976379 PMC4247350
  10. [13]den Braber A Heritability of subcortical brain measures: a perspective for future genome-wide association studies Neuroimage 2013 83 98 102 23770413
  11. [14]Kremen WS Genetic and environmental influences on the size of specific brain regions in midlife: the VETSA MRI study Neuroimage 2010 49 1213 1223 19786105 PMC3397915
  12. [15]Yang J Genetic variance estimation with imputed variants finds negligible missing heritability for human height and body mass index Nat Genet 2015 47 1114 1120 26323059 PMC4589513
  13. [16]Zuk O Hechter E Sunyaev SR Lander ES The mystery of missing heritability: Genetic interactions create phantom heritability Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012 109 1193 1198 22223662 PMC3268279
  14. [18]Fornage M Genome-wide association studies of cerebral white matter lesion burden: the CHARGE consortium Ann Neurol 2011 69 928 939 21681796 PMC3122147
  15. [19]Nature GC Consortium, G Genetic effects on gene expression across human tissues Nature 2017 550 204 213 29022597 PMC5776756
  16. [20]Duyn J MR susceptibility imaging J Magn Reson 2013 229 198 207 23273840 PMC3602381
  17. [21]Dusi S Exome sequence reveals mutations in CoA synthase as a cause of neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation Am J Hum Genet 2014 94 11 22 24360804 PMC3882905
  18. [23]Savage JE GWAS meta-analysis (N=279,930) identifies new genes and functional links to intelligence bioRxiv 2017 1 36 10.1101/184853 · DOI
  19. [24]Goes FS Genome-wide association study of schizophrenia in Ashkenazi Jews Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2015 168 649 659 26198764
  20. [25]International Consortium for Blood Pressure Genome-Wide Association Studies Genetic variants in novel pathways influence blood pressure and cardiovascular disease risk Nature 2011 478 103 109 21909115 PMC3340926
  21. [26]Johansson A Genome-wide association and Mendelian randomization study of NT-proBNP in patients with acute coronary syndrome Hum Mol Genet 2016 25 1447 1456 26908625
  22. [27]Duncan J The multiple-demand (MD) system of the primate brain: mental programs for intelligent behaviour Trends Cogn Sci (Regul Ed) 2010 14 172 179 20171926
  23. [28]Dolan RJ Dopaminergic modulation of impaired cognitive activation in the anterior cingulate cortex in schizophrenia Nature 1995 378 180 182 7477319
  24. [30]Deak KL Analysis of ALDH1A2, CYP26A1, CYP26B1, CRABP1, and CRABP2 in human neural tube defects suggests a possible association with alleles in ALDH1A2 Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology 2005 73 868 875 16237707
  25. [31]Jen JC Mutations in a Human ROBO Gene Disrupt Hindbrain Axon Pathway Crossing and Morphogenesis Science 2004 304 1509 1513 15105459 PMC1618874
  26. [34]Haijma SV Brain volumes in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis in over 18 000 subjects Schizophr Bull 2013 39 1129 1138 23042112 PMC3756785
  27. [35]Finucane HK Partitioning heritability by functional annotation using genome-wide association summary statistics Nat Genet 2015 47 1228 1235 26414678 PMC4626285
  28. [37]Dale AM Fischl B Sereno MI Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction Neuroimage 1999 9 179 194 9931268
  29. [38]Fischl B Sereno MI Dale AM Cortical surface-based analysis. II: Inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system Neuroimage 1999 9 195 207 9931269
  30. [39]Klein A Tourville J 101 labeled brain images and a consistent human cortical labeling protocol Front Neurosci 2012 6 171 23227001 PMC3514540
  31. [41]Hyvärinen A Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis IEEE Trans Neural Netw 1999 10 626 634 18252563
  32. [42]Duff EP Learning to identify CNS drug action and efficacy using multistudy fMRI data Sci Transl Med 2015 7 274ra16–274ra16 25673761
  33. [43]McCarthy S A reference panel of 64,976 haplotypes for genotype imputation bioRxiv 2015 035170 10.1101/035170 PMC5388176 27548312 · DOI
  34. [44]Bycroft C Genome-wide genetic data on ~500,000 UK Biobank participants bioRxiv 2017 1 36 10.1101/166298 · DOI
  35. [46]Smith SM Nichols TE Statistical Challenges in ‘Big Data’ Human Neuroimaging Neuron 2018 97 263 268 29346749
  36. [47]Cai J-F Candès EJ Shen Z A Singular Value Thresholding Algorithm for Matrix Completion SIAM Journal on Optimization 2010 20 1956 1982
  37. [48]Smith SM Accurate, robust, and automated longitudinal and cross-sectional brain change analysis Neuroimage 2002 17 479 489 12482100
  38. [49]Dahl A A multiple-phenotype imputation method for genetic studies Nat Genet 2016 1 9 10.1038/ng.3513 PMC4817234 26901065 · DOI
  39. [50]Luciano M 116 independent genetic variants influence the neuroticism personality trait in over 329,000 UK Biobank individuals 2017 1 32 10.1101/168906 · DOI
  40. [51]Davies G Ninety-nine independent genetic loci influencing general cognitive function include genes associated with brain health and structure (N = 280,360) bioRxiv 2017 1 35 10.1101/176511 · DOI
  41. [52]Bulik-Sullivan B An atlas of genetic correlations across human diseases and traits Nat Genet 2015 47 1236 1241 26414676 PMC4797329

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elliott, L. T., Sharp, K., Alfaro-Almagro, F., Shi, S., Miller, K. L., Douaud, G., Marchini, J., & Smith, S. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Centre for Human Genetics (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Marchini, Jonathan
  • Smith, Stephen M.
Venue
Nature
Published
2018-10-10
Volume
562
Issue
7726
Pages
210-216
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2895693082
Cited by
834
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 95 · 2025: 123 · 2024: 135 · 2023: 113 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1
FWCI
42.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (202788/Z/16/Z)
  • University of Oxford
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K02213X/1, MC_PC_17228, MR/K006673/1)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/J005444/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders
Keywords
brain imaging phenotypes, heritability, single nucleotide polymorphisms, brain structure, brain function, iron transport genes, magnetic susceptibility, white matter microstructure, extracellular matrix genes, epidermal growth factor, brain development, brain aging, neuroimaging genetics
MeSH terms
Aging, Brain, Epidermal Growth Factor, Extracellular Matrix, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Iron, Male, Neuronal Plasticity, Phenotype, Putamen, Signal Transduction, Biological Specimen Banks, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Heredity, Genome-Wide Association Study, Neuroimaging, White Matter, Datasets as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review