Cited by 839CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringCAR-T cell therapy researchVirus-based gene therapy research

Reprogramming human T cell function and specificity with non-viral genome targeting

Open access
Roth, Theodore L., Puig-Saus, Cristina, Yu, Ruby, Shifrut, Eric, Carnevale, Julia, Li, P. Jonathan, Hiatt, Joseph, Saco, Justin +37 more·2018·Nature

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Decades of work have aimed to genetically reprogram T cells for therapeutic purposes 1,2 using recombinant viral vectors, which do not target transgenes to specific genomic sites 3,4. The need for viral vectors has slowed down research and clinical use as their manufacturing and testing is lengthy and expensive. Genome editing brought the promise of specific and efficient insertion of large transgenes into target cells using homology-directed repair 5,6. Here we developed a CRISPR-Cas9 genome-targeting system that does not require viral vectors, allowing rapid and efficient insertion of large DNA sequences (greater than one kilobase) at specific sites in the genomes of primary human T cells, while preserving cell viability and function. This permits individual or multiplexed modification of endogenous genes. First, we applied this strategy to correct a pathogenic IL2RA mutation in cells from patients with monogenic autoimmune disease, and demonstrate improved signalling function. Second, we replaced the endogenous T cell receptor (TCR) locus with a new TCR that redirected T cells to a cancer antigen. The resulting TCR-engineered T cells specifically recognized tumour antigens and mounted productive anti-tumour cell responses in vitro and in vivo. Together, these studies provide preclinical evidence that non-viral genome targeting can enable rapid and flexible experimental manipulation and therapeutic engineering of primary human immune cells.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-018-0326-5

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a Phase I clinical trial, an autologous bispecific CD19/CD22-targeted CAR T cell therapy was manufactured using the FasT CAR platform, reducing cell culture time to less than 24 hours.

    “For a Phase I clinical trial, researchers manufactured an autologous, bispecific CD19/CD22-targeted CAR T cell therapy using the FasT CAR platform, reducing cell culture time to less than 24 hours (117,118).”

    From Scalable Manufacturing of CAR T Cells for Cancer Immunotherapy (2021) · cites this paper as [118]

    The Abstract (page unavailable) describes preclinical engineering of NY-ESO-1-targeted TCR cells, not a Phase I trial of bispecific CD19/CD22 CAR T cells. The Methods (Primary human T cell culture, page unavailable) specify two days of stimulation before electroporation, and the Abstract reports ten days of expansion—not cell culture lasting less than 24 hours. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In ten adolescent and adult patients with CD19+ relapsed/refractory B-ALL who received CD19 FasT CAR T cells, 10/10 (100%) achieved CR on day 15 after infusion, with only one patient experiencing CRS.

    “On day 15 after cell infusion, 10/10 (100%) patients achieved CR, with only one patient experiencing CRS (118).”

    From Scalable Manufacturing of CAR T Cells for Cancer Immunotherapy (2021) · cites this paper as [118]

    The Abstract describes NY-ESO-1 TCR-engineered cells reducing tumour burden in treated animals, and Extended Data Figure 10 describes a mouse melanoma model; neither reports outcomes for patients receiving CD19 FasT CAR T cells. Searches for the day-15 10/10 complete-remission result and cytokine release syndrome found no passage addressing those claims. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Multiple barcoded templates introduced into the same cell could complicate interpretation of each one's effects.

    “In addition, multiple barcoded templates introduced in the same cell could complicate interpretation of each one’s effects (Feldman et al., 2018; Roth et al., 2018).”

    From Pooled Knockin Targeting for Genome Engineering of Cellular Immunotherapies (2020) · cites this paper as Roth et al., 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roth, T. L., Puig-Saus, C., Yu, R., Shifrut, E., Carnevale, J., Li, P. J., Hiatt, J., Saco, J., Krystofinski, P., Li, H., Tobin, V., Nguyen, D. N., Lee, M. R., Putnam, A. L., Ferris, A. L., Chen, J. W., Schickel, J.-N., Pellerin, L., Carmody, D., Alkorta-Aranburu, G., del Gaudio, D., Matsumoto, H., Morell, M., Mao, Y., Cho, M., Quadros, R. M., Gurumurthy, C. B., Smith, B., Haugwitz, M., Hughes, S. H., Weissman, J. S., Schumann, K., Esensten, J. H., May, A. P., Ashworth, A., Kupfer, G. M., Greeley, S. A. W., Bacchetta, R., Meffre, E., Roncarolo, M. G., Romberg, N., Herold, K. C., Ribas, A., Leonetti, M. D., & Marson, A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • National Cancer Institute (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Takara (United States) (US)
  • Chan Zuckerberg Biohub San Francisco (US)
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
Corresponding author
Marson, Alexander
Venue
Nature
Published
2018-07
Volume
559
Issue
7714
Pages
405-409
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2818540548
Cited by
839
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 89 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 110 · 2022: 116 · 2021: 128 · 2020: 100 · 2019: 98 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 1
FWCI
30.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  • W. M. Keck Foundation
  • Jeffrey Modell Foundation
  • Sanofi
  • Gilead Sciences
  • Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy (P30 DK063720, R35 CA197633)
  • Multiple Sclerosis Society
  • National Institutes of Health (1s10od021822-01, DK020595, DK063720, NIH P30 DK063720)
  • University of California, San Francisco (T32 DK007418, 1S10OD021822-01, T32GM007618, P30DK063720, DK063720)
  • Juno Therapeutics
  • National Cancer Institute (CA197633, T32CA108462, P30CA082103, R35CA197633)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P50GM082250, T32GM007618)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (T32AI007334, K23AI115001, L40 AI140341, T32AI007641)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DP3DK111914, K23DK094866, P30DK063720, T32DK007418, P30DK020595)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
Keywords
CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, T cell engineering, cancer immunotherapy, homology-directed repair, T cell reprogramming
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, Animals, Cells, Cultured, Humans, Male, Neoplasm Transplantation, Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, T-Lymphocytes, Protein Engineering, Autoimmunity, Genome, Human, Mice, Interleukin-2 Receptor alpha Subunit, CRISPR-Cas Systems, Cellular Reprogramming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review