Cited by 369Quantum many-body systemsQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture

Verified quantum information scrambling

Open access
Landsman, K. A., Figgatt, C., Schuster, T., Linke, N. M., Yoshida, B., Yao, N. Y., Monroe, C.·2019·Nature

Abstract

Quantum scrambling is the dispersal of local information into many-body quantum entanglements and correlations distributed throughout an entire system. This concept accompanies the dynamics of thermalization in closed quantum systems, and has recently emerged as a powerful tool for characterizing chaos in black holes 1-4. However, the direct experimental measurement of quantum scrambling is difficult, owing to the exponential complexity of ergodic many-body entangled states. One way to characterize quantum scrambling is to measure an out-of-time-ordered correlation function (OTOC); however, because scrambling leads to their decay, OTOCs do not generally discriminate between quantum scrambling and ordinary decoherence. Here we implement a quantum circuit that provides a positive test for the scrambling features of a given unitary process 5,6. This approach conditionally teleports a quantum state through the circuit, providing an unambiguous test for whether scrambling has occurred, while simultaneously measuring an OTOC. We engineer quantum scrambling processes through a tunable three-qubit unitary operation as part of a seven-qubit circuit on an ion trap quantum computer. Measured teleportation fidelities are typically about 80 per cent, and enable us to experimentally bound the scrambling-induced decay of the corresponding OTOC measurement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-019-0952-6

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The walk was realized on a chain of seven individual 171Yb+ ions confined in a Paul trap and laser-cooled close to their motional ground state.

    “We realize the walk on a chain of seven individual 171Yb+ ions confined in a Paul trap and laser-cooled close to their motional ground state45,51.”

    From Quantum walks and Dirac cellular automata on a programmable trapped-ion quantum computer (2020) · cites this paper as [51]

    The Trapped Ion Qubits section (p. 7) confirms that the experiment used ¹⁷¹Yb⁺ ions in a Paul trap, laser-cooled near the motional ground state. It specifies a chain of nine ions, however, with only the middle seven used as qubits—not a chain of seven ions. The citing authors’ walk is their own experiment, not a result attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [2]Yasuhiro Sekino and Leonard Susskind. Fast scramblers. Journal of High Energy Physics , 2008(10):065, 2008.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Landsman, K. A., Figgatt, C., Schuster, T., Linke, N. M., Yoshida, B., Yao, N. Y., & Monroe, C.
Affiliations
  • Joint Center for Quantum Information and Computer Science (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Perimeter Institute (CA)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Landsman, K. A.
Venue
Nature
Published
2019-03-06
Volume
567
Issue
7746
Pages
61-65
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2805441291
Cited by
368
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 1
FWCI
20.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Keywords
quantum scrambling, quantum chaos, quantum teleportation, ion trap quantum computing, decoherence, thermalization, black holes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review