The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fidelity benchmarks for two-qubit gates in silicon
Open accessAbstract
Universal quantum computation will require qubit technology based on a scalable platform1, together with quantum error correction protocols that place strict limits on the maximum infidelities for one- and two-qubit gate operations2,3. Although various qubit systems have shown high fidelities at the one-qubit level4–10, the only solid-state qubits manufactured using standard lithographic techniques that have demonstrated two-qubit fidelities near the fault-tolerance threshold6 have been in superconductor systems. Silicon-based quantum dot qubits are also amenable to large-scale fabrication and can achieve high single-qubit gate fidelities (exceeding 99.9 per cent) using isotopically enriched silicon11,12. Two-qubit gates have now been demonstrated in a number of systems13–15, but as yet an accurate assessment of their fidelities using Clifford-based randomized benchmarking, which uses sequences of randomly chosen gates to measure the error, has not been achieved. Here, for qubits encoded on the electron spin states of gate-defined quantum dots, we demonstrate Bell state tomography with fidelities ranging from 80 to 89 per cent, and two-qubit randomized benchmarking with an average Clifford gate fidelity of 94.7 per cent and an average controlled-rotation fidelity of 98 per cent. These fidelities are found to be limited by the relatively long gate times used here compared with the decoherence times of the qubits. Silicon qubit designs employing fast gate operations with high Rabi frequencies16,17, together with advanced pulsing techniques18, should therefore enable much higher fidelities in the near future. Two-qubit logic gates in a silicon-based system are shown (using randomized benchmarking) to have high gate fidelities of operation and are used to generate Bell states, a step towards solid-state quantum computation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum computation with quantum dots
Loss, D., & DiVincenzo, D. P. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.57.120 · Cited by 6,840
Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation
Fowler, A. G., Mariantoni, M., Martinis, J. M., & Cleland, A. N. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.032324 · Cited by 3,059
Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits
Kok, P., Munro, W. J., Nemoto, K., Ralph, T. C., Dowling, J. P., & Milburn, G. J. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.135 · Cited by 2,904
Superconducting quantum circuits at the surface code threshold for fault tolerance
Barends, R., Kelly, J., Megrant, A., Veitia, A., Sank, D., Jeffrey, E., White, T. C., Mutus, J., Fowler, A. G., Campbell, B., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13171 · Cited by 1,733
Theory of quantum error-correcting codes
Knill, E., & Laflamme, R. (1997) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.55.900 · Cited by 1,593
NMR techniques for quantum control and computation
Vandersypen, L. M. K., & Chuang, I. L. (2005) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.76.1037 · Cited by 1,217
Quantum computing with trapped ions
HAFFNER, H., ROOS, C., & BLATT, R. (2008) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2008.09.003 · Cited by 1,154
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- Rong, X. et al. Experimental fault-tolerant universal quantum gates with solid-state spins under ambient conditions. Nat. Commun. 6, 8748 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
- Muhonen, J. T. et al. Quantifying the quantum gate fidelity of single-atom spin qubits in silicon by randomized benchmarking. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 27, 154205 (2015). · DOI
- Veldhorst, M. et al. An addressable quantum dot qubit with fault-tolerant control-fidelity. Nature Nanotechnol. 9, 981–985 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
- Nichol, J. M. et al. High-fidelity entangling gate for double-quantum-dot spin qubits. npj Quant. Inform. 3, 3 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
- Itoh, K. M. & Watanabe, H. Isotope engineering of silicon and diamond for quantum computing and sensing applications. MRS Commun. 4, 143–157 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
- Ladd, T. D. & Carroll, M. S. Silicon qubits. In Encyclopedia of Modern Optics 2nd edn, 467–477 (Elsevier, 2018). · DOI
- Veldhorst, M. et al. A two-qubit logic gate in silicon. Nature 526, 410–414 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
- Watson, T. F. et al. A programmable two-qubit quantum processor in silicon. Nature 555, 633–637 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
- Zajac, D. M. et al. Resonantly driven cnot gate for electron spins. Science 359, 439–442 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
- Kawakami, E. et al. Electrical control of a long-lived spin qubit in a Si/SiGe quantum dot. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 666–670 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
- Yoneda, J. et al. A quantum-dot spin qubit with coherence limited by charge noise and fidelity higher than 99.9%. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 102106 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
- Elzerman, J. M. et al. Single-shot read-out of an individual electron spin in a quantum dot. Nature 430, 431 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
- Petta, J. R. et al. Coherent manipulation of coupled electron spins in semiconductor quantum dots. Science 309, 2180–2184 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
- Koppens, F. H. L. et al. Driven coherent oscillations of a single electron spin in a quantum dot. Nature 442, 766–771 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
- Pioro-Ladrière, M. et al. Electrically driven single-electron spin resonance in a slanting Zeeman field. Nat. Phys. 4, 776779 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
- Golovach, V. N., Borhani, M. & Loss, D. Electric-dipole-induced spin resonance in quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B 74, 165319 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
- Maurand, R. et al. A CMOS silicon spin qubit. Nat. Commun. 7, 13575 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
- Huang, W., Veldhorst, M., Zimmerman, N. M., Dzurak, A. S. & Culcer, D. Electrically driven spin qubit based on valley mixing. Phys. Rev. B 95, 075403 (2017). · doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.075403
- Corna, A. et al. Electrically driven electron spin resonance mediated by spin-valley-orbit coupling in a silicon quantum dot. npj Quant. Inform. 4, 6 (2018). · DOI
- Nowack, K. C., Koppens, F. H. L., Nazarov, Y. V. & Vandersypen, L. M. K. Coherent control of a single electron spin with electric fields. Science 318, 1430–1433 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
- Yang, C. H. et al. Silicon qubit fidelities approaching incoherent noise limits via pulse engineering. Nat. Electron. 2, 151–158 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
- Nowack, K. C. et al. Single-shot correlations and two- qubit gate of solid-state spins. Science 333, 1269–1272 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
- Kalra, R., Laucht, A., Hill, C. D. & Morello, A. Robust two-qubit gates for donors in silicon controlled by hyperfine interactions. Phys. Rev. X 4, 021044 (2014).
- Ryan, C., Laforest, M. & Laflamme, R. Randomized benchmarking of single- and multi-qubit control in liquid-state NMR quantum information processing. New J. Phys. 11, 013034 (2009). · DOI
- Laucht, A. et al. A dressed spin qubit in silicon. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 6166 (2017). · DOI
- Yang, C. H. et al. Spin-valley lifetimes in a silicon quantum dot with tunable valley splitting. Nat. Commun. 4, 2069 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
- Dehollain, J. P. et al. Nanoscale broadband transmission lines for spin qubit control. Nanotechnology 24, 015202 (2013). · DOI
- Yang, C. H., Lim, W. H., Zwanenburg, F. A. & Dzurak, A. S. Dynamically controlled charge sensing of a few electron silicon quantum dot. AIP Adv. 1, 042111 (2011). · doi:10.1063/1.3654496
- McKay, D. C., Wood, C. J., Sheldon, S., Chow, J. M. & Gambetta, J. M. Efficient z gates for quantum computing. Phys. Rev. A 96, 022330 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
- Sergeevich, A., Chandran, A., Combes, J., Bartlett, S. D. & Wiseman, H. M. Characterization of a qubit Hamiltonian using adaptive measurements in a fixed basis. Phys. Rev. A 84, 052315 (2011). · DOI
- Shulman, M. D. et al. Suppressing qubit dephasing using real-time hamiltonian estimation. Nat. Commun. 5, 5156 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
- Delbecq, M. R. et al. Quantum dephasing in a gated gaas triple quantum dot due to nonergodic noise. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 046802 (2016). · DOI
Cited by
Suppressing quantum errors by scaling a surface code logical qubit
Google Quantum, A. I., Acharya, R., Aleiner, I., Allen, R., Andersen, T. I., Ansmann, M., Arute, F., Arya, K., Asfaw, A., Atalaya, J., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05434-1 · Cited by 1,103
Materials challenges and opportunities for quantum computing hardware
de Leon, N. P., Itoh, K. M., Kim, D., Mehta, K. K., Northup, T. E., Paik, H., Palmer, B. S., Samarth, N., Sangtawesin, S., & Steuerman, D. W. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb2823 · Cited by 710
Self-citationQuantum Simulators: Architectures and Opportunities
Altman, E., Brown, K. R., Carleo, G., Carr, L. D., Demler, E., Chin, C., DeMarco, B., Economou, S. E., Eriksson, M. A., Fu, K.-M. C., et al. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.017003 · Cited by 559
Quantum logic with spin qubits crossing the surface code threshold
Xue, X., Russ, M., Samkharadze, N., Undseth, B., Sammak, A., Scappucci, G., & Vandersypen, L. M. K. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04273-w · Cited by 524
Fast universal quantum gate above the fault-tolerance threshold in silicon
Noiri, A., Takeda, K., Nakajima, T., Kobayashi, T., Sammak, A., Scappucci, G., & Tarucha, S. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04182-y · Cited by 471
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, W., Yang, C. H., Chan, K. W., Tanttu, T., Hensen, B., Leon, R. C. C., Fogarty, M. A., Hwang, J. C. C., Hudson, F. E., Itoh, K. M., Morello, A., Laucht, A., & Dzurak, A. S.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 569
- Issue
- 7757
- Pages
- 532-536
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2799493790
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 25.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- www.springer.com/tdm (vor)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fidelity benchmarks for two-qubit gates in silicon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41586-019-1197-0
- The paper
- Huang, W., Yang, C. H., Chan, K. W., Tanttu, T., Hensen, B., Leon, R. C. C., Fogarty, M. A., Hwang, J. C. C., Hudson, F. E., Itoh, K. M., Morello, A., Laucht, A., & Dzurak, A. S. (2019). Fidelity benchmarks for two-qubit gates in silicon. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1197-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.