The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mutation bias reflects natural selection in Arabidopsis thaliana
Open accessAbstract
Since the first half of the twentieth century, evolutionary theory has been dominated by the idea that mutations occur randomly with respect to their consequences 1 . Here we test this assumption with large surveys of de novo mutations in the plant Arabidopsis thaliana . In contrast to expectations, we find that mutations occur less often in functionally constrained regions of the genome—mutation frequency is reduced by half inside gene bodies and by two-thirds in essential genes. With independent genomic mutation datasets, including from the largest Arabidopsis mutation accumulation experiment conducted to date, we demonstrate that epigenomic and physical features explain over 90% of variance in the genome-wide pattern of mutation bias surrounding genes. Observed mutation frequencies around genes in turn accurately predict patterns of genetic polymorphisms in natural Arabidopsis accessions ( r = 0.96). That mutation bias is the primary force behind patterns of sequence evolution around genes in natural accessions is supported by analyses of allele frequencies. Finally, we find that genes subject to stronger purifying selection have a lower mutation rate. We conclude that epigenome-associated mutation bias 2 reduces the occurrence of deleterious mutations in Arabidopsis , challenging the prevailing paradigm that mutation is a directionless force in evolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.
Tajima, F. (1989) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/123.3.585 · Cited by 13,941
Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila
McDonald, J. H., & Kreitman, M. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/351652a0 · Cited by 3,283
Mi, H., Muruganujan, A., Ebert, D., Huang, X., & Thomas, P. D. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky1038 · Cited by 3,033
ART: a next-generation sequencing read simulator
Huang, W., Li, L., Myers, J. R., & Marth, G. T. (2012) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr708 · Cited by 1,596
The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations
Eyre-Walker, A., & Keightley, P. D. (2007) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2146 · Cited by 1,478
1,135 Genomes Reveal the Global Pattern of Polymorphism in Arabidopsis thaliana
Alonso-Blanco, C., Andrade, J., Becker, C., Bemm, F., Bergelson, J., Borgwardt, K. M., Cao, J., Chae, E., Dezwaan, T. M., Ding, W., et al. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.063 · Cited by 1,329
Self-citationEvolution of the mutation rate
Lynch, M. (2010) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2010.05.003 · Cited by 1,151
The Rate and Molecular Spectrum of Spontaneous Mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana
Ossowski, S., Schneeberger, K., Lucas-Lledó, J. I., Warthmann, N., Clark, R. M., Shaw, R. G., Weigel, D., & Lynch, M. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1180677 · Cited by 1,144
Self-citationShilatifard, A. (2012) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-051710-134100 · Cited by 1,091
Whole-genome sequencing of multiple Arabidopsis thaliana populations
Cao, J., Schneeberger, K., Ossowski, S., Günther, T., Bender, S., Fitz, J., Koenig, D., Lanz, C., Stegle, O., Lippert, C., et al. (2011) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.911 · Cited by 950
Self-citation
Cited by
The vast majority of somatic mutations in plants are layer-specific
Goel, M., Campoy, J. A., Krause, K., Baus, L. C., Sahu, A., Sun, H., Walkemeier, B., Marek, M., Beaudry, R., Ruiz, D., et al. (2024) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-024-03337-0 · Cited by 31
MacGowan, S. A., Madeira, F., Britto-Borges, T., & Barton, G. J. (2024) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-024-06117-5 · Cited by 8
Large haplotypes highlight a complex age structure within the maize pan-genome
Liu, J., & Dawe, R. K. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.02.22.481510 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Monroe, J. G., Srikant, T., Carbonell-Bejerano, P., Becker, C., Lensink, M., Exposito-Alonso, M., Klein, M., Hildebrandt, J., Neumann, M., Kliebenstein, D., Weng, M.-L., Imbert, E., Ågren, J., Rutter, M. T., Fenster, C. B., & Weigel, D.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2022-01-12
- Volume
- 602
- Issue
- 7895
- Pages
- 101-105
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W4205790736
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 90
- FWCI
- 47.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mutation bias reflects natural selection in Arabidopsis thaliana. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41586-021-04269-6
- The paper
- Monroe, J. G., Srikant, T., Carbonell-Bejerano, P., Becker, C., Lensink, M., Exposito-Alonso, M., Klein, M., Hildebrandt, J., Neumann, M., Kliebenstein, D., Weng, M.-L., Imbert, E., Ågren, J., Rutter, M. T., Fenster, C. B., & Weigel, D. (2022). Mutation bias reflects natural selection in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04269-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.