Cited by 171Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Entorhinal cortex directs learning-related changes in CA1 representations

Open access
Grienberger, Christine, Magee, Jeffrey C.·2022·Nature

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Learning-related changes in brain activity are thought to underlie adaptive behaviours 1,2 . For instance, the learning of a reward site by rodents requires the development of an over-representation of that location in the hippocampus 3–6 . How this learning-related change occurs remains unknown. Here we recorded hippocampal CA1 population activity as mice learned a reward location on a linear treadmill. Physiological and pharmacological evidence suggests that the adaptive over-representation required behavioural timescale synaptic plasticity (BTSP) 7 . BTSP is known to be driven by dendritic voltage signals that we proposed were initiated by input from entorhinal cortex layer 3 (EC3). Accordingly, the CA1 over-representation was largely removed by optogenetic inhibition of EC3 activity. Recordings from EC3 neurons revealed an activity pattern that could provide an instructive signal directing BTSP to generate the over-representation. Consistent with this function, our observations show that exposure to a second environment possessing a prominent reward-predictive cue resulted in both EC3 activity and CA1 place field density that were more elevated at the cue than at the reward. These data indicate that learning-related changes in the hippocampus are produced by synaptic plasticity directed by an instructive signal from the EC3 that seems to be specifically adapted to the behaviourally relevant features of the environment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-022-05378-6

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Plateau potentials on their own do not change synaptic strength.

    “These plateau potentials on their own do not change synaptic strength.”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [426]

    The Role of BTSP section (page not provided) says Ca2+ plateau potentials drive BTSP and can induce plasticity in a single trial, contrary to the claim that they do not change synaptic strength. The paper does not separately test a plateau in the absence of synaptic input, so its statement does not establish that plateaus are sufficient without input. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Input to CA1 from entorhinal cortex provides an instructive signal in the form of large Ca2+-dependent dendritic plateau potentials.

    “Input to CA1 from entorhinal cortex provides an instructive signal in the form of large Ca2+-dependent dendritic plateau potentials (424, 426).”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [426]

    The ‘Form of EC3 instructive signal’ section says EC3 input provides a target-like instructive signal and increases the probability of dendritic Ca2+ plateau potentials. It distinguishes that EC3 signal from the resulting plateaus, which function as local error signals in CA1; the claim conflates the two by saying the input provides its signal ‘in the form of’ plateau potentials. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. [2]Martin SJ Grimwood PD Morris RG Synaptic plasticity and memory: an evaluation of the hypothesis Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2000 23 649 711 10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.649 10845078 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [3]Dupret D O’Neill J Pleydell-Bouverie B Csicsvari J The reorganization and reactivation of hippocampal maps predict spatial memory performance Nat. Neurosci. 2010 13 995 1002 10.1038/nn.2599 20639874 PMC2923061 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [4]Hollup SA Molden S Donnett JG Moser MB Moser EI Accumulation of hippocampal place fields at the goal location in an annular watermaze task J. Neurosci. 2001 21 1635 1644 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-05-01635.2001 11222654 PMC6762966 · DOI
  4. [6]Zaremba JD Impaired hippocampal place cell dynamics in a mouse model of the 22q11.2 deletion Nat. Neurosci. 2017 20 1612 1623 10.1038/nn.4634 28869582 PMC5763006 · DOI
  5. [7]Magee JC Grienberger C Synaptic plasticity forms and functions Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2020 43 95 117 10.1146/annurev-neuro-090919-022842 32075520 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [9]Mehta MR Quirk MC Wilson MA Experience-dependent asymmetric shape of hippocampal receptive fields Neuron 2000 25 707 715 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81072-7 10774737 · DOI
  7. [11]Dana H Thy1-GCaMP6 transgenic mice for neuronal population imaging in vivo PLoS ONE 2014 9 e108697 10.1371/journal.pone.0108697 25250714 PMC4177405 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [12]Bittner KC Milstein AD Grienberger C Romani S Magee JC Behavioral time scale synaptic plasticity underlies CA1 place fields Science 2017 357 1033 1036 10.1126/science.aan3846 28883072 PMC7289271 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [13]Milstein AD Bidirectional synaptic plasticity rapidly modifies hippocampal representations Elife 2021 10 e73046 10.7554/eLife.73046 34882093 PMC8776257 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [14]Takahashi H Magee JC Pathway interactions and synaptic plasticity in the dendritic tuft regions of CA1 pyramidal neurons Neuron 2009 62 102 111 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.03.007 19376070 · DOI
  11. [15]Grienberger C Chen X Konnerth A NMDA receptor-dependent multidendrite Ca2+ spikes required for hippocampal burst firing in vivo Neuron 2014 81 1274 1281 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.01.014 24560703 · DOI
  12. [16]Bittner KC Conjunctive input processing drives feature selectivity in hippocampal CA1 neurons Nat. Neurosci. 2015 18 1133 1142 10.1038/nn.4062 26167906 PMC4888374 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [17]Grienberger C Milstein AD Bittner KC Romani S Magee JC Inhibitory suppression of heterogeneously tuned excitation enhances spatial coding in CA1 place cells Nat. Neurosci. 2017 20 417 426 10.1038/nn.4486 28114296 · DOI
  14. [18]Zhao X Wang Y Spruston N Magee JC Membrane potential dynamics underlying context-dependent sensory responses in the hippocampus Nat. Neurosci. 2020 23 881 891 10.1038/s41593-020-0646-2 32451487 · DOI
  15. [19]Priestley JB Bowler JC Rolotti SV Fusi S Losonczy A Signatures of rapid plasticity in hippocampal CA1 representations during novel experiences Neuron 2022 110 1978 1992 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.03.026 35447088 PMC9233041 · DOI · Paper page
  16. [20]Megias M Emri Z Freund TF Gulyas AI Total number and distribution of inhibitory and excitatory synapses on hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells Neuroscience 2001 102 527 540 10.1016/S0306-4522(00)00496-6 11226691 · DOI · Paper page
  17. [21]Steward O Scoville SA Cells of origin of entorhinal cortical afferents to the hippocampus and fascia dentata of the rat J. Comp. Neurol. 1976 169 347 370 10.1002/cne.901690306 972204 · DOI
  18. [22]Suh J Rivest AJ Nakashiba T Tominaga T Tonegawa S Entorhinal cortex layer III input to the hippocampus is crucial for temporal association memory Science 2011 334 1415 1420 10.1126/science.1210125 22052975 · DOI
  19. [23]Bittner KC Andrasfalvy BK Magee JC Ion channel gradients in the apical tuft region of CA1 pyramidal neurons PLoS ONE 2012 7 e46652 10.1371/journal.pone.0046652 23056387 PMC3463549 · DOI
  20. [24]Tervo DG A designer AAV variant permits efficient retrograde access to projection neurons Neuron 2016 92 372 382 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.09.021 27720486 PMC5872824 · DOI
  21. [25]Chow BY High-performance genetically targetable optical neural silencing by light-driven proton pumps Nature 2010 463 98 102 10.1038/nature08652 20054397 PMC2939492 · DOI
  22. [26]Li N Spatiotemporal constraints on optogenetic inactivation in cortical circuits Elife 2019 8 e48622 10.7554/eLife.48622 31736463 PMC6892606 · DOI
  23. [27]Campbell MG Principles governing the integration of landmark and self-motion cues in entorhinal cortical codes for navigation Nat. Neurosci. 2018 21 1096 1106 10.1038/s41593-018-0189-y 30038279 PMC6205817 · DOI
  24. [28]Cholvin T Hainmueller T Bartos M The hippocampus converts dynamic entorhinal inputs into stable spatial maps Neuron 2021 109 3135 3148 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.09.019 34619088 PMC8516433 · DOI
  25. [30]Tang Q Anatomical organization and spatiotemporal firing patterns of layer 3 neurons in the rat medial entorhinal cortex J. Neurosci. 2015 35 12346 12354 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0696-15.2015 26354904 PMC6605397 · DOI
  26. [31]Egorov AV Hamam BN Fransen E Hasselmo ME Alonso AA Graded persistent activity in entorhinal cortex neurons Nature 2002 420 173 178 10.1038/nature01171 12432392 · DOI · Paper page
  27. [32]Hahn TT McFarland JM Berberich S Sakmann B Mehta MR Spontaneous persistent activity in entorhinal cortex modulates cortico-hippocampal interaction in vivo Nat. Neurosci. 2012 15 1531 1538 10.1038/nn.3236 23042081 PMC3655708 · DOI
  28. [33]Tahvildari B Fransen E Alonso AA Hasselmo ME Switching between "On" and "Off" states of persistent activity in lateral entorhinal layer III neurons Hippocampus 2007 17 257 263 10.1002/hipo.20270 17315198 · DOI
  29. [35]Butler WN Hardcastle K Giocomo LM Remembered reward locations restructure entorhinal spatial maps Science 2019 363 1447 1452 10.1126/science.aav5297 30923222 PMC6516752 · DOI · Paper page
  30. [36]Diehl GW Hon OJ Leutgeb S Leutgeb JK Grid and nongrid cells in medial entorhinal cortex represent spatial location and environmental features with complementary coding schemes Neuron 2017 94 83 92 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.03.004 28343867 PMC5444540 · DOI · Paper page
  31. [37]Enikolopov AG Abbott LF Sawtell NB Internally generated predictions enhance neural and behavioral detection of sensory stimuli in an electric fish Neuron 2018 99 135 146 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.06.006 30001507 PMC6561334 · DOI
  32. [38]Sacramento, J., Ponte Costa, R., Bengio, Y. & Senn, W. Dendritic cortical microcircuits approximate the backpropagation algorithm. in Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 31 (eds Bengio, S. et al.) (NeurIPS, 2018).
  33. [39]Royer S Control of timing, rate and bursts of hippocampal place cells by dendritic and somatic inhibition Nat. Neurosci. 2012 15 769 775 10.1038/nn.3077 22446878 PMC4919905 · DOI · Paper page
  34. [41]Williams SR Fletcher LN A dendritic substrate for the cholinergic control of neocortical output neurons Neuron 2019 101 486 499 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.11.035 30594427 · DOI
  35. [42]Bloss EB Single excitatory axons form clustered synapses onto CA1 pyramidal cell dendrites Nat. Neurosci. 2018 21 353 363 10.1038/s41593-018-0084-6 29459763 · DOI
  36. [43]Labarrera C Adrenergic modulation regulates the dendritic excitability of layer 5 pyramidal neurons in vivo Cell Rep. 2018 23 1034 1044 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.103 29694883 · DOI
  37. [44]Rolotti SV Local feedback inhibition tightly controls rapid formation of hippocampal place fields Neuron 2021 110 783 794 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.12.003 PMC8897257 34990571 · DOI
  38. [45]Diamantaki M Manipulating hippocampal place cell activity by single-cell stimulation in freely moving mice Cell Rep. 2018 23 32 38 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.031 29617670 · DOI · Paper page
  39. [46]Zhao X Hsu CL Spruston N Rapid synaptic plasticity contributes to a learned conjunctive code of position and choice-related information in the hippocampus Neuron 2022 110 96 108 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.10.003 34678146 · DOI
  40. [47]Bengio, Y. Deriving differential target propagation from iterating approximate inverses. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.15139 (2020). · arXiv
  41. [48]Lillicrap TP Santoro A Marris L Akerman CJ Hinton G Backpropagation and the brain Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2020 21 335 346 10.1038/s41583-020-0277-3 32303713 · DOI · Paper page
  42. [49]Kostadinov D Beau M Blanco-Pozo M Hausser M Predictive and reactive reward signals conveyed by climbing fiber inputs to cerebellar Purkinje cells Nat. Neurosci. 2019 22 950 962 10.1038/s41593-019-0381-8 31036947 PMC7612392 · DOI · Paper page
  43. [50]Raymond JL Medina JF Computational principles of supervised learning in the cerebellum Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2018 41 233 253 10.1146/annurev-neuro-080317-061948 29986160 PMC6056176 · DOI
  44. [51]Sparta DR Construction of implantable optical fibers for long-term optogenetic manipulation of neural circuits Nat. Protoc. 2011 7 12 23 10.1038/nprot.2011.413 22157972 PMC8647635 · DOI · Paper page
  45. [53]Kaifosh P Zaremba JD Danielson NB Losonczy A SIMA: Python software for analysis of dynamic fluorescence imaging data Front. Neuroinform. 2014 8 80 10.3389/fninf.2014.00080 25295002 PMC4172099 · DOI
  46. [54]Pachitariu, M. et al. Suite2p: beyond 10,000 neurons with standard two-photon microscopy. Preprint at bioRxiv10.1101/061507 (2017).
  47. [56]Colquhoun, D. & Hawkes, A. G. in Microelectrode Techniques: the Plymouth Workshop Handbook (ed. Ogden, D.) 141–188 (The Company of Biologists, 1994).
  48. [57]Danielson NB Sublayer-specific coding dynamics during spatial navigation and learning in hippocampal area CA1 Neuron 2016 91 652 665 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.06.020 27397517 PMC4975984 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grienberger, C., & Magee, J. C.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Magee, Jeffrey C.
Venue
Nature
Published
2022-11-02
Volume
611
Issue
7936
Pages
554-562
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W4307931716
Cited by
171
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 8
FWCI
17.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Cullen Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
hippocampal CA1, optogenetic inhibition, reward-predictive cues, spatial learning
MeSH terms
Animals, Cues, Dendrites, Learning, Models, Neurological, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Reward, Entorhinal Cortex, Mice, CA1 Region, Hippocampal, Optogenetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review