Cited by 394Memory and Neural MechanismsSpatial Cognition and NavigationNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

A Dedicated Population for Reward Coding in the Hippocampus

Open access
Gauthier, Jeffrey L., Tank, David W.·2018·Neuron

Abstract

The hippocampus plays a critical role in goal-directed navigation. Across different environments, however, hippocampal maps are randomized, making it unclear how goal locations could be encoded consistently. To address this question, we developed a virtual reality task with shifting reward contingencies to distinguish place versus reward encoding. In mice performing the task, large-scale recordings in CA1 and subiculum revealed a small, specialized cell population that was only active near reward yet whose activity could not be explained by sensory cues or stereotyped reward anticipation behavior. Across different virtual environments, most cells remapped randomly, but reward encoding consistently arose from a single pool of cells, suggesting that they formed a dedicated channel for reward. These observations represent a significant departure from the current understanding of CA1 as a relatively homogeneous ensemble without fixed coding properties and provide a new candidate for the cellular basis of goal memory in the hippocampus.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.06.008

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Place fields uniformly tiled the available space, with a slight over-representation of the reward's position and of prominent tactile cues on the belt.

    “Place fields uniformly tiled the available space (Fig. 1c), with a slight over-representation of the reward’s position and of prominent tactile cues on the belt (see also refs. 39–41).”

    From Place and behavioral modulation of hippocampal neurons during immobility (2026) · cites this paper as [40]

    The Results (Moving Reward Location Within One Environment; page unavailable) report approximately uniform spatial-field density across most of the track, with excess density near reward. They do not report over-representation at tactile cues on a belt; the Methods describe visual textures and towers along a virtual track instead. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The criteria used for PC identification are similar to those in the existing literature in both mammals and birds, for both electrophysiological and calcium imaging data.

    “The criteria we use are similar to those in the existing literature in both mammals and birds, for both electrophysiological and calcium imaging data16,53.”

    From A population code for spatial representation in the zebrafish telencephalon (2024) · cites this paper as [53]

    In STAR★METHODS, Quantification and Statistical Analysis (page unavailable), the paper gives criteria for identifying spatially modulated cells and place cells from calcium-imaging data in mice. It does not compare those criteria with criteria used in birds or establish their similarity to electrophysiological criteria. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gauthier, J. L., & Tank, D. W.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Gauthier, Jeffrey L.
  • Tank, David W.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
99
Issue
1
Pages
179-193.e7
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2811470308
Cited by
394
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 15
FWCI
20.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH NRSA (1F32NS077840-01A1)
  • NIH NIMH (R01 2R01MH083686-06)
  • NIH (R37NS081242-06)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
reward coding, hippocampus, CA1, subiculum, place cells, goal-directed navigation, virtual reality navigation, reward anticipation
MeSH terms
Virtual Reality, Animals, Hippocampus, Motivation, Neurons, Reward, Task Performance and Analysis, Mice, CA1 Region, Hippocampal, Optical Imaging, Spatial Navigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review