The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 23 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families
Open accessAbstract
Deep-learning language models have shown promise in various biotechnological applications, including protein design and engineering. Here we describe ProGen, a language model that can generate protein sequences with a predictable function across large protein families, akin to generating grammatically and semantically correct natural language sentences on diverse topics. The model was trained on 280 million protein sequences from >19,000 families and is augmented with control tags specifying protein properties. ProGen can be further fine-tuned to curated sequences and tags to improve controllable generation performance of proteins from families with sufficient homologous samples. Artificial proteins fine-tuned to five distinct lysozyme families showed similar catalytic efficiencies as natural lysozymes, with sequence identity to natural proteins as low as 31.4%. ProGen is readily adapted to diverse protein families, as we demonstrate with chorismate mutase and malate dehydrogenase.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
32 Own result · 14 Own interpretation · 11 Not checked yet · 8 Own method · 4 No basis given · 1 Couldn’t confirm · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“As in the crystal structure of L056, the predicted artificial structures roughly match known structures found in nature, Fig S11, including for low identity (<40%) artificial sequences.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [14] Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract and Main section describe AlphaFold’s structure-prediction accuracy, including cases without a known similar structure. Our copy does not address whether predicted structures of functional artificial sequences resemble natural structures, including at below 40% sequence identity (searched: artificial sequences, L056, and 40% identity). (LLM, conf=0.77)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Could not verify
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our protein language model is trained by simply learning to predict the next amino acid for over 280 million protein sequences from thousands of protein families, without explicit biophysical modeling.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“After training, ProGen can be prompted to generate full-length protein sequences for any protein family from scratch, with a varying degree of similarity to natural proteins.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Our artificial lysozymes span the sequence landscape of natural lysozymes, Fig. 2a, across five families which contain diverse protein folds, active site architectures, and enzymatic mechanisms49,50.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [49] Baase, W. A., Liu, L., Tronrud, D. E. & Matthews, B. W. Lessons from the lysozyme of phage T4. Protein Sci. 19, 631–641 (2010). source
- Not checked yetcites [50] Kuroki, R., Weaver, L. H. & Matthews, B. W. A covalent enzyme–substrate intermediate with saccharide distortion in a mutant T4 lysozyme. Science 262, 2030–2033 (1993). source
plainn = 5- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The five lysozyme families chosen because they lack disulfide bonds can be expressed in high-throughput cell-free systems.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“they demonstrate similar residue position entropies when forming separate multiple sequence alignments of natural and artificial proteins within each family, Fig. 2c.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
boostedn = 5- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the positive control set of 100 natural proteins, 72% were well-expressed based on chromatography peaks and band visualization.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our artificial proteins match activity levels of natural proteins even at lower levels of sequence identity to any known natural protein, (Fig 3b, Fig. S5).”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The representative natural proteins exhibited similar levels of functionality with 59% (53/90) of total proteins considered functional.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“None of the bmDCA artificial proteins exhibited a detectable level of functionality, Fig. S10”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [7] Russ, W. P. et al. An evolution-based model for designing chorismate mutase enzymes. Science 369, 440–445 (2020). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Generated proteins exhibit similar conservation patterns to natural sequence libraries (Fig. 4ad).”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 29
- Probably not a substantial claim. 16
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“ProGen is a 1.2 billion-parameter neural network trained using a publicly available dataset of 280 million protein sequences.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we could readily measure the KM values for the purified apparent lower molecular weight species, where both L056 and L070 were highly active and had comparable Michaelis-Menten parameters to HEWL (Fig. 3e).”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among our artificial proteins, 73% (66/90) were functional and exhibited high levels of functionality across families, Fig. 3c.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Notably a small number of proteins, both within the natural and artificial proteins, were within an order of magnitude of HEWL, which was substantially more active than all negative controls.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Two proteins, L056 (max ID 69.6%) and L070 (max ID 89.2%) expressed well and incurred bactericidal activities towards the E. coli BL21(DE3) strain used during overnight induction at 16C.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The ProGen-generated proteins express equally well (72/100 total) across all bins of sequence identity to any known natural protein (maxID 40–90%), Fig 2e.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite having comparable enzymatic activities, L070 and L056 only share 17.9% sequence ID.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We also found that there is no bias to location or structural element to the mutations that diverge L056 and L070 from their respective nearest sequence homolog in nature. Differing residues are instead uniformly distributed.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The KM values of both monomers were too weak to be measured using a heterogeneous, fluorescein-labeled Micrococcus lysodeikticus cell wall substrate (Molecular Probes EnzChek Lysozyme kit); however, both monomers were active using a pseudo-first order kinetic assay (Fig. S7).”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some mutations are even found within the active site cleft and within regions that influence conformational state (for L056).”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“We determined a 2.5 Å resolution crystal of L056 (see Methods, Figure 3e). The global fold was similar to predictions, with a Cα RMSD of 2.9 Å from the backbone structure predicted by trRosetta and 2.3 Å RMSD from a WT T4 Lysozyme structure59,60.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
What the sources say
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“bmDCA was unable to fit three out of the five lysozyme families, and exhibited 60% detectable expression (30/50 proteins) for the remaining two protein families.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [7] Russ, W. P. et al. An evolution-based model for designing chorismate mutase enzymes. Science 369, 440–445 (2020). source
plainn = 5- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Alignment with a structure featuring a covalently trapped substrate (PDB 148L) reveals that the active site cleft is well formed with the key catalytic residue Glu15 (Glu 11 in T4L) and key substrate binding residue Thr30 (Thr26 in T4L) correctly positioned.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These likelihoods showed a significant drop in AUC of 0.18 for CM (p<0.0001, two-tailed test, n=1617) and 0.08 for MDH (p<0.1, two-tailed test, n=56), as compared to fine-tuned ProGen when predicting if an artificial sequence should function.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
plaindirectn = 1,617 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“On MDH function data, ProGen log-likelihoods had an AUC of 0.94 (Fig. 4f), which was better than ProteinGAN discriminator scores, with an AUC of 0.87 (p<0.1, two-tailed test, n=56).”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [66] Vig, J. et al. BERTology meets biology: Interpreting attention in protein language models. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR, 2020). source
plainn = 56 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“On CM function data, ProGen log-likelihoods had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85, significantly better (p<0.0001, two-tailed test, n=1617) than bmDCA, which had an AUC of 0.78 (Fig. 4c).”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [7] Russ, W. P. et al. An evolution-based model for designing chorismate mutase enzymes. Science 369, 440–445 (2020). source
plainn = 1,617- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We purified 6 highly expressed proteins and found that they were all active, but with significantly lower Michaelis-Menten activities than HEWL or the previously generated artificial proteins L056 and L070 (Fig 3f).”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of the selected sequences, 78 out of the 89 (88%) expressed well and 24 out of the 78 (31%) were soluble (Supplemental Figure 8).”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
plainn = 2- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“L013 and L038 expressed highly to inclusion bodies.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Methods > E. coli Expression of Lysozyme Variants
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For lowID lysozyme A5 the above protocol was altered slightly to accommodate lower catalytic activity of these variants: reaction volumes were increased to 20 μL, plate was covered with an optically transparent seal (Microseal ® ‘B’ seal; BioRad) to mitigate sample evaporation, fluorescent reads were taken every 5 mins for 16 hours with 5 s of linear plate shaking prior to each measurement to min”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Methods > Michaelis-Menten kinetics of lysozyme variants using fluorescein-labeled M. lysodeikticus cell wall
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The MDH functional labels are binary, so no thresholding was needed to compute AUCs.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Methods > Evaluating ProGen on Other Protein Systems
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The resultant data were not described by a single exponential model but were described by a double exponential model (Eq. 6), likely due to the heterogeneity of the substrate, and all data were fit in IgorPro7.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Methods > Lysozyme kcat/KM extrapolation from pseudo first-order kinetic data
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For induced cultures of L056 and L070, significant turbidity was observed in the spent media after cells were pelleted at 3,500 r.c.f. for 30 mins at 4°C.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Methods > E. coli Expression of Lysozyme Variants
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Two peaks were resolved for each variant and that harbored lysozyme activity against the fluorescein-labeled M. Lysodeikticus cell wall substrate (EnzChek kit; ThermoFisher).”
- Also stated in: § Purification of L056 and L070 from spent media · plain
“Two peaks were resolved for each variant and that harbored lysozyme activity against the fluorescein-labeled M. Lysodeikticus cell wall substrate (EnzChek kit; ThermoFisher) that corresponded to peaks observed in the first pool purification.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Methods > Purification of L056 and L070 from spent media
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Purification of L056 and L070 from spent media · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Significant translational non-crystallographic symmetry and differences with the search model resulted in maps that were initially hard to interpret.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Methods > Crystallization and structure determination of L056
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These results indicate that ProGen generates protein sequences that not only can express well but also maintain enzymatic function for diverse sequence landscapes across protein families.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Well-expression and solubility in the cell-free system indicate that the artificial proteins are structurally well-folded.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Taken together, L056 and L070 harbor potent catalytic activity and bactericidal capabilities that are comparable to HEWL, while diverging from their nearest known natural sequence by 53 and 18 amino acids respectively.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: HEWL is a suitable reference for native lysozyme catalytic activity.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The perplexity on a held-out test set was monitored and did not exceed training set perplexity throughout model training.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Methods > ProGen Training
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While we do not expect our language model to generate proteins that belong to a completely different distribution or domain (for example creating a new fold that catalyzes an unnatural reaction), it can significantly expand the space of protein sequences from those sampled by evolution.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The 280 million-sequence training set is diverse enough to learn a universal protein representation transferable across families.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The aggregated dataset was split into a training set of size 280 million and two test sets, an out-of-distribution test set (OOD-test) of size 100k from 20 protein families and a randomly sampled in-domain test set (ID-test) of size 1 million, that were held-out for training and used for evaluation.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Methods > Training Data Curation
plainn = 20- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In sum, ProGen’s model likelihoods are better aligned with experimentally-measured assay data on two diverse protein datasets—chorismate mutase and malate dehydrogenase—than the sequence generation methods from original studies specifically tailored for these families.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [7] Russ, W. P. et al. An evolution-based model for designing chorismate mutase enzymes. Science 369, 440–445 (2020). source
- Not checked yetcites [66] Vig, J. et al. BERTology meets biology: Interpreting attention in protein language models. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR, 2020). source
plaincorrelationaln = 1,617- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These results indicate that both components of our training strategy—initial training on the universal sequence dataset and fine-tuning on the protein family of interest—contribute significantly to final model performance.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For robustness, we trained three discriminators using different random seeds.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Methods > Lysozyme Sequence Selection
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Proteins that generated fluorescence one standard deviation above the maximum fluorescence of any negative control were considered functional.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The resultant data were not described by a single exponential model but were described by a double exponential model (Eq. 6), likely due to the heterogeneity of the substrate, and all data were fit in IgorPro7.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Methods > Lysozyme kcat/KM extrapolation from pseudo first-order kinetic data
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: The average molecular weight of the fluorescein-labeled M. lysodeikticus cell wall substrate is unknown and the substrate is heterogeneous.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We also ensured that no two generated samples share over 80% identity with each other.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“After measuring the AUC of each model for each dataset, we used bootstrapping to compute the statistical significance of the difference in AUC of fine-tuned ProGen vs. the reference method (bmDCA and ProGen ablations for CM, ProteinGAN and ProGen ablations for MDH).”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Methods > Evaluating ProGen on Other Protein Systems
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The fine-tuning dataset was clustered at 80% sequence identity and 10% of the clusters were held-out as a validation set for hyper-parameter optimization and stopping criteria.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Methods > Lysozyme Generation
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“We also applied thresholding at 0.42 norm relative enrichment (r.e.) to obtain binary labels for CM function, which roughly corresponds to the cut-off point between two modes that exist in CM function data, to be used for ROC curves, following the original study7.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Methods > Evaluating ProGen on Other Protein Systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [7] Russ, W. P. et al. An evolution-based model for designing chorismate mutase enzymes. Science 369, 440–445 (2020). source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We performed structure prediction without an MSA as input so as to not heavily bias the structure prediction toward a known natural mode.”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper relies on this without support.
The five lysozyme families chosen because they lack disulfide bonds can be expressed in high-throughput cell-free systems.
“Within the lysozyme clan, we chose to work with five families that lack disulfide bonds as to be amenable to high-throughput cell-free expression: Phage lysozyme, Pesticin, Glucosaminidase, Glycoside hydrolase, and Transglycosylase.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Well-expression and solubility in the cell-free system indicate that the artificial proteins are structurally well-folded.
“These results indicate that ProGen can generate artificial proteins that are structurally well-folded for proper expression as compared to a batch of natural proteins”
The paper relies on this without support.
The 280 million-sequence training set is diverse enough to learn a universal protein representation transferable across families.
“Trained in this unsupervised manner from a large, varied protein sequence database, ProGen learns a universal, domain-independent representation of proteins that subsumes local and global structure motifs”
The paper relies on this without support.
HEWL is a suitable reference for native lysozyme catalytic activity.
“Hen egg white lysozyme (HEWL), a naturally-evolved exemplar protein, was measured as positive control”
The paper relies on this without support.
Model likelihoods for GANs are intractable.
“Since model likelihoods for GANs are intractable, we used discriminator scores corresponding to the probability at which the ProteinGAN discriminator predicted each sample was real as a ProteinGAN model score for each MDH sequence.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The average molecular weight of the fluorescein-labeled M. lysodeikticus cell wall substrate is unknown and the substrate is heterogeneous.
“(the average molecular weight of the fluorescein-labeled M. Lysodeikticus cell wall substrate was unknown and likely heterogeneous).”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“synthetic proteins optimized for specific families of lysozymes using ProGen have exhibited catalytic efficiencies comparable to their naturally occurring counterparts with low sequence identity.”
From Large language models (LLMs): survey, technical frameworks, and future challenges (2024) · cites this paper as Madani et al. 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“AI models have already been used to design new CRISPR enzymes,53 functional proteins,128 and even entire prokaryotic genomes.51”
From How to build the virtual cell with artificial intelligence: Priorities and opportunities (2024) · cites this paper as [128]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The success of LLMs has revolutionized AI learning in natural language and image processing [75] and has been extended into the learning of biological sequence datasets [80].”
From Challenges in AI-driven Biomedical Multimodal Data Fusion and Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [80]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“the ProGen (Madani et al. 2023) language model employs deep learning techniques to produce protein sequences with predefined functionalities.”
From Large language models (LLMs): survey, technical frameworks, and future challenges (2024) · cites this paper as Madani et al. 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Abstract
“a state-of-the-art transformer-based conditional language model trained only with evolutionary sequence data”
§ Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families > Methods > ProGen Training
“The model was initialized with pretrained weights of CTRL28, which was trained on an English language corpus.”
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
Features and development of Coot
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G., & Cowtan, K. (2010) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444910007493 · Cited by 29,915
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372
Phaser crystallographic software
McCoy, A. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Adams, P. D., Winn, M. D., Storoni, L. C., & Read, R. J. (2007) · Journal of Applied Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0021889807021206 · Cited by 20,612
Kabsch, W. (2010) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444909047337 · Cited by 16,463
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer
Raffel, C., Shazeer, N., Roberts, A., Lee, K., Narang, S., Matena, M., Zhou, Y., Li, W., & Liu, P. J. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.10683 · Cited by 10,929
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Vaswani, A. et al. Attention is all you need. In 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS, 2017).
- Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K. & Toutanova, K. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT, 2019).
- Zellers, R. et al. Defending against neural fake news. In 33rd Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS, 2019).
- Radford, A., Narasimhan, K., Salimans, T. & Sutskever, I. Improving language understanding by generative pre-training. Preprint at https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/openai-assets/research-covers/language-unsupervised/language_understanding_paper.pdf (2018).
- Dathathri, S. et al. Plug and play language models: a simple approach to controlled text generation. In 8th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR, 2020).
- Pettit, L. D. The IUPAC stability constants database. Chem. Int. 28, 14–15 (2006).
- Bengio, Y., Ducharme, R., Vincent, P. & Janvin, C. A neural probabilistic language model. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 1137–1155 (2003).
- Goyal, K., Dyer, C. & Berg-Kirkpatrick, T. Exposing the implicit energy networks behind masked language models via metropolis–hastings. In 10th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR, 2022).
- Alley, E., Khimulya, G., Biswas, S., AlQuraishi, M. & Church, G. M. Unified rational protein engineering with sequence-based deep representation learning. Nat. Methods 16, 1315–1322 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
- Pascanu, R., Mikolov, T. & Bengio, Y. On the difficulty of training recurrent neural networks. In Proc. 30th International Conference on Machine Learning (eds. Dasgupta, S. & McAllester, D.) 1310–1318 (PMLR, 2013).
- Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I. & Salakhutdinov, R. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15, 1929–1958 (2014).
- Holtzman, A., Buys, J., Du, L., Forbes, M. & Choi, Y. The curious case of neural text degeneration. In 8th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR, 2020).
- Goodfellow, I. J. et al. Generative adversarial networks. In 28th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS, 2014).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,012
From First Principles to Function: How AI Is Reshaping Enzyme Design
Lindner, S., Hardy, F. J., & Hilvert, D. (2026) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.biochem.6c00356 · Cited by 1
Lang, S., Motov, S., Krueckel, J., Scherer, J., Staartjes, V., & Wuertz-Kozak, K. (2026) · JOR Spine · doi:10.1002/jsp2.70203
“Building on similar transformer principles, generative sequence models have successfully produced functional proteins with experimentally validated activity, illustrating that LLM systems can move from passive annotation toward hypothesis-driven molecular design [55].”
CatESO: Differentiable Enzyme Sequence Optimization Guided by Substrate-Aware kcat PredictionPreprint
Gan, Z., Xu, Y.-Z., Xu, J.-D., Wu, Z.-H., Huang, J.-P., Yin, J.-B., Chen, G., & Zhang, J. Z. (2026) · bioRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.07.04.736506
Bridging Algorithms and Biocatalysis: Perspectives on AI-Supported Enzyme Engineering
Teijeiro-Juiz, R., Brück, T., & Loll, B. (2026) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules31132359
AI-orchestrated design–build–test–learn is the future of mammalian biodesign
Han, J., & Fussenegger, M. (2026) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-026-01730-7
Mizutani, K., Yashiro, R., & Tokuyama, K. (2026) · Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering · doi:10.1016/j.jbiosc.2026.06.003
Xu, Q., Ren, Y., Zhao, Y., Hu, Y., & Yuan, J. (2026) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-026-05696-w
“…enabling potential continues to expand across diverse domains, ranging from protein structure prediction (Jumper et al., 2021) and molecular design (Madani et al., 2023) in the life science, to novel compound generation and material property prediction in chemistry and materials science (Duan et…”
Mind the gap: An embedding guide to safely travel in sequence space
Wu, A., Trolliet, Q., Rajendran, A., Lála, J., & Angioletti‐Uberti, S. (2026) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014433 · Cited by 2
Kabanga, E. K., Jee, S., Messem, A. V., & Neve, W. D. (2026) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.34133/csbj.0171
“Subsequent work extended diffusion models to discrete biological sequences [ 32 , 33 ], protein sequence generation [ 34 , 35 ], and biologically constrained optimization [ 36 , 37 ], high-lighting their versatility across genomic and molecular design tasks.”
Chen, L., Liu, H., & Zhao, Y. (2026) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.6c01199
Computational Redesign of an Antifreeze Protein Using Deep LearningPreprint
Calia, C. N., Altunc, A. J., Eufemio, R. J., Alvarado, B. O., Huynh, J. D., Oh, E., Burkart, M. D., Meister, K., & Paesani, F. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.06.21.733612
Autonomous Generation of Metamaterial Databases Based on Multimodal Agents
Qin, S.-L., Yu, Z.-C., Zheng, X., Zhang, Y., Yang, A., Zhao, K.-Z., Chen, Q.-C., You, J.-W., & Cui, T.-J. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.22774
Thorstenson, R. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.21876
“…(ProtT5-XL; Elnaggar et al., 2021), bidirectional MLM variants beyond ESM-2 (ESM-1b, Rives et al., 2021; AMPLIFY-350M, Fournier et al., 2024), and a causal LM (ProGen2-xlarge; Madani et al., 2023); we introduce repr-CJ as the technical change that makes the cross-architecture comparison possible.”
Explainable machine learning reveals evolutionary signals in influenza haemagglutinin
Meyer, A. G. (2026) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2025.1302 · Cited by 1
Be Your Own Teacher: Steering Protein Language Models via Unsupervised Reward Optimization
Li, L.-Q., Mo, S., Yu, Y., & Heng, P.-A. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.18961
“For instance, ProGen [7, 19] and ProLLaMA [48] enable conditional generation to create novel proteins across diverse families, while frontier multimodal foundation model like ESM3 [11] can jointly reason over sequence, structure, and function to perform complex, instruction-guided design tasks,…”
MoE-Bind: Guiding De Novo Protein Binder Generation with Sparse Experts
Sarkar, D., & Sarkar, C. (2026) · bioRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.06.13.732043
SPPIDER-seq: sequence-based partner-aware predictor of protein-protein interaction sites
Porollo, A., Jadhav, O., Alvarez, A., & Chen, J.-C. (2026) · Bioinform. · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btag388
“These embeddings have been successfully repurposed for diverse downstream tasks, including protein structure prediction (Madani et al. 2023, Ruffolo and Madani 2024, Zhang et al. 2024b, Gomez-Uribe et al. 2025) or mutation effect analysis (Marquet et al. 2022, Marquet et al. 2024, Sun and Shen…”
Ludwig, L., Chungyoun, M., & Gray, J. J. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.06.08.730660
“Central to many of these advances are protein language models (PLMs), which learn high-dimensional representations of amino acid sequences that capture structural, functional, and evolutionary relationships [18], enabling the design of proteins with improved stability or function [19–21].”
Viral Proteins Reveal Geometry of Protein Language ModelsPreprint
Bigot, A., Bhasin, H., Park, C. W., Shakhnovich, E. I., & Wang, D. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.12609
“…scores from masked pLMs have been widely used as zero-shot proxies for mutational effects, functional tolerance, viral escape, and generated-protein filtering (Salazar et al., 2020; Meier et al., 2021b; Hie et al., 2021; Verkuil et al., 2022; Madani et al., 2023; Notin et al., 2023).”
Void-X: A generative void-filling model for predicting atomic packing in proteins
Yang, J., Yuan, J., & Chou, J. J. (2026) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2607035123
Gao, Q.-C., Fang, Z.-C., Yuan, Y.-J., Jin, M.-Y., Sun, H., Peng, Z., Yang, L.-Y., Li, J.-Y., & Wei, D.-Q. (2026) · bioRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.06.02.729708
“S1b) 23,33,34 .”
Begum, A., Manisha, D. R. L., & Sudhakar, M. (2026) · International Journal of Research and Review · doi:10.52403/ijrr.20260610
From prediction to discovery: AI as an observatory of physical organization in protein space
Zheng, Y., Zhang, Z., Wang, Y., Kang, W., Ren, W., & Tang, Q.-Y. (2026) · AI for Science · doi:10.1088/3050-287x/ae78ea
“Sequence-level generative models learn distributions over protein sequences, either unconditionally or under functional, family, or structural conditions [9, 54].”
Itan, Y. P., & Itan, Y. (2026) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes17060723
“…patterns, active-site motifs, and mutational tolerance, and can help estimate missense variant impact, including effects that correlate with stability or function, enhancing variant prioritization for disease causality, and supporting sequence design toward desired protein functions [18–20].”
InfluentialZhang, X., Yang, S., Wang, T.-T., Fu, S., Yu, J.-X., Xia, M., Zhang, Y., Ma, Q., & Gao, X. (2026) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2026.178324
Computational identification of antigen-specific T cell groups through generative epitope modeling
Ma, M., Tu, W., Vasquez-Rios, C., & Ding, J. (2026) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.116505 · Cited by 2
“Recent protein language models, such as ProtGPT2, 48 ProGen, 49 and ProGen2, 46 demonstrated protein sequence generation capabilities but lack precise control mechanisms.”
Tu, T., Huang, W., Li, Z., Ding, K., Yang, Y., & Luo, Y. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.05.21.726972 · Cited by 1
“Recent advances in large-scale protein language models (pLMs) 39–42 have demonstrated that amino acid sequences can be modeled analogously to natural language.”
Redesign to Mechanism: Interpretable AI Reveals Determinants of Protein Hydrate Binding
Zhang, N., Ba, T., Li, Y., Liu, J., & Zhang, L.-R. (2026) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.6c00954
LineageFlow: Flow Matching for High-Fidelity Family-Aware Protein Sequence Generation
Liang, L.-Z., Yang, M., Feng, Y., Li, J., Pan, S.-R., Xu, Y.-H., Ying, T.-L., Zheng, Y., & Xu, Z.-L. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.22252
“Large protein language models trained on massive corpora learn rich sequence regularities and can be used for unconditional generation or prompted design (Rives et al., 2021; Elnaggar et al., 2022; Madani et al., 2023).”
InfluentialPlasmidLM: A Promptable DNA Language Model via Verifiable-Reward Post-TrainingPreprint
Thiel, M., & Barnes, C. P. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.05.19.725242
“In the protein domain, conditional generation is further along, with family-conditional models [Madani et al., 2023] and discrete-diffusion approaches [Alamdari et al., 2023] demonstrating controllable single-chain generation; the analogous problem for DNA at the construct level has remained open.”
Zhu, Z.-Y., Hu, K., Chen, Z.-F., Shi, Y.-H., Bao, M.-L., Zhao, J., Wang, G., Xu, H.-T., Li, J., Zhao, Q.-J., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.22338
Song, S., Shi, H., Wu, H.-F., Liu, D.-C., Lin, Y.-H., Isa, N. A. M., Zou, Q., & Wei, L.-Y. (2026) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014344
“Protein sequences are input into the pretrained protein language models ESMFold and ESM-2, producing predicted structural PDB files and 2,560-dimensional sequence embeddings, respectively.”
Yeon, K., Liu, X.-F., & Ghosal, P. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.21522
“Some research treats protein sequences as biological language and utilizes transformer architectures to model amino acid interactions [55, 56].”
Toward relational biosecurity: understanding AI-enabled biology as a connected system
Holko, M. (2026) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2026.1856819
Komianos, N., & Prakash, P. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.05.12.724473
“PLM-based peptide and protein design [8] optimizes for sequence naturalness, that is, sequences that look plausible to a model trained on the protein universe.”
Kell, D. B., & Roberts, I. (2026) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d5cs01387a
ProteinOPD: Towards Effective and Efficient Preference Alignment for Protein Design
Zhang, Y.-L., Cao, H., Jiang, Z., Zi, C.-Y., Zhou, Z.-P., Liu, Z.-J., Li, Y., Li, J., & Gao, Z.-Q. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.10189
“The most straightforward approach is supervised fine-tuning (SFT) [22, 25, 26], which adapts the PLM on a curated set of sequences pre-screened to satisfy the target objective.”
The Biosecurity Blind Spot: Systematic Dual-use Detection in Open Science InfrastructurePreprint
Sharma, V., Singh, C. K., Choudhari, J., & Nakrani, D. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.28843
“…and therapeutic design (Jumper et al. (2021); Mak et al. (2024); Baek et al. (2021); Dauparas et al. (2022); Lin et al. (2023); Corso et al. (2023); Chen et al. (2022); Olsen et al. (2022); Shuai et al. (2021); Bagal et al. (2022); Ahmad et al. (2022); Madani et al. (2023); Ferruz et al. (2022)).”
BERT-T6: Toward High-Accuracy T6SS Bacterial Toxin Identification Using a Protein Language Model
Mo, X.-W., Cai, J.-X., & Siu, S. W. I. (2026) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.5c02744
DOMINO: Learning Domain Co-occurrence for Multidomain Protein DesignPreprint
Dai, F., Su, J., Tan, Q., Yang, H., Zhou, X., & Yuan, F. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.05.01.721929
“Although deep learning has advanced protein structure prediction and design [21–25], most approaches operate primarily at the level of sequences, structures or local functional motifs, rather than explicitly learning domain-level compatibility across natural multidomain architectures.”
Implementation of Generative AI in Biomedical Research and Healthcare
Nikolopoulos, A., & Karalis, V. D. (2026) · Applied Biosciences · doi:10.3390/applbiosci5020034
“Furthermore, experimental testing confirmed that the synthesized lysozymes retained enzymatic activity despite their low sequence homology with natural ones [9].”
Machine-guided design for bioengineering gene therapy vectors: Where are we and what lies ahead?
Rodrigues, A. F., Ferraz, L., & Pesquita, C. (2026) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2026.108925
Sun, Z.-S., Chen, P., Ge, X.-Y., Zhang, W., & Liu, H. (2026) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology15100804
“For example, protein language models (pLMs) have emerged as a mainstream framework for enzyme function prediction and design [112].”
Self-citationCRC-Screen: Certified DNA-Synthesis Hazard Screening Under Taxonomic Shift
Hasan, N. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.00074
“Generative models for protein design (Madani et al., 2023; Lin et al., 2023) produce variants that retain function while drifting in primary sequence, and red-team studies have begun to evaluate whether language-model assistance offers operational uplift to non-state actors planning biological…”
SPPIDER-seq: Sequence-based partner-aware predictor of protein-protein interaction sitesPreprint
Porollo, A., Jadhav, O., Alvarez, A., & Chen, J.-C. (2026) · bioRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.04.28.721359
“These embeddings have been successfully repurposed for diverse downstream tasks, including protein structure prediction (Gomez-Uribe et al., 2025; Madani et al., 2023; Ruffolo & Madani, 2024; Z. Zhang et al., 2024) or mutation effect analysis (Marquet et al., 2022; Marquet et al., 2024; Sun & Shen,…”
Gong, J., Ma, P., Ren, Z., Li, S., Fu, Z., Sun, P., Ni, M., & Bo, X. (2026) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btag196
“Protein language models (PLMs) have seen significant advancements in recent years (Rives et al. 2021, Elnaggar et al. 2022, Madani et al. 2023, Su et al. 2024).”
APPLICATION OF MACHINE LEARNING METHODS IN EARLY DRUG DEVELOPMENT
Maksimov, A. S., & Дергачёва, Ж. М. (2026) · Vestnik Farmacii · doi:10.52540/2074-9457.2026.1.72
Li, S., Zhou, J., Song, X., Chen, J., Wang, Y., & Yao, L. (2026) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.5c17734
Unsupervised protein language models learn patterns of enzyme functionPreprint
Penner, M., Lihan, M., Bormke, H., Nix, P., Moscho, H., Dupree, P., & Hollfelder, F. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.04.23.720319
“This ability is in contrast to the state of the art in functional fine-tuning of protein language models for enzymes, where ‘function’ is often reduced to a single E.C. class 65 or semi-automated database tags 60,68 .”
Pareto-Optimal Offline Reinforcement Learning via Smooth Tchebysheff Scalarization
Bhatnagar, A., Groth, P. M., Ibarraran, S., & Madani, A. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.13175
“Large language models have been trained on massive corpora of text, code, images, and proteins [12, 18, 19, 46, 50, 63, 79].”
Self-citationXiao, Y., Sun, J., Hao, Y., Xie, L., Duo, H., Zou, Y., Li, Y., Qin, D., Yang, Q., & Li, B. (2026) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2026.118880
CatPath‐GPT: A Mixture of Experts System for Computational Catalyst Design
Wang, X., Jiao, Z., & Wang, Z. (2026) · SmartMat · doi:10.1002/smm2.70080
MEMpre: Enhanced Membrane Protein Type Prediction via AlphaFold-Driven Protein Large Language Models
Guo, L., Zhu, Z., Lam, T. K., Zhong, Y., Fang, J.-C., Wang, X., Dong, J.-Y., & Chen, W. (2026) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2026.105738
Roy, K. (2026) · The EuroBiotech Journal · doi:10.2478/ebtj-2026-0005
“17 These generative results challenge prior assumptions about minimum sequence identity requirements for function and suggest that PLM-learned sequence spaces are substantially broader than evolutionary sampling alone would suggest.”
Co-designing sequence and structure of functional de novo enzymes with EnzyGen2Preprint
Song, Z., Liu, H., Zhao, Y., Yang, Y., & Li, L. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.03.02.709205 · Cited by 1
Wang, R. W., Jin, K., & Pan, L. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.03.26.714619
Computational design of class II MHC binding peptide with sequence-based evolution information
Cao, Y., Li, Y., Ren, W., Li, W., & Yang, M. (2026) · Bioinformatics Advances · doi:10.1093/bioadv/vbag090
“Given that the MHCII binding peptides lack stable secondary structures, they cannot be effectively designed using conventional or AI-based methods which rely heavily on the structural information (Madani et al .”
MHCBind: A Pan- and Allele-Specific Model for Predicting Class I MHC-Peptide Binding Affinity
Peddi, N., Bijjula, D. R., Gogte, S., & Kondaparthi, V. (2026) · bioRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.03.20.713120
“Each pathway used initial embedding and contact map predictions [23] derived from the powerful ESM-1b protein language model [24].”
Xu, J., Zhang, Z., Gong, Z., Li, J., Zeng, P., Zhang, Z., Li, X., Jin, S., Chen, H., & Meng, Y. (2026) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v40i32.39944
“Concurrently, generative models like Pro-Gen (Madani et al. 2023) have enabled the design of novel, experimentally validated functional proteins.”
MAESD: A Unified Multi-Agent Evolutionary Framework for Protein Sequence Design
Song, Z., Yang, H., Deng, Z., Pan, X., Shen, H., Hu, S., & Zhong, Y. (2026) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.5c02580
Chen, C., Zhang, Y., Yin, W., & Xiang, Y. (2026) · International Conference on Bioinformatics and Intelligent Computing (BIC) · doi:10.1145/3809986.3810006
“…motifs, or module-level constraints, PLM-guided design supports rational diversification while maintaining consistency with biological priors learned from large-scale sequence databases, significantly narrowing the effective search space compared with traditional random mutagenesis[38, 58].”
A New Beginning of Rational Design in the Age of Large Language Models of Synthetic Biology
Li, L., Wang, Z., He, X., & Lou, C. (2026) · International Conference on Bioinformatics and Intelligent Computing (BIC) · doi:10.1145/3809986.3810000
“Similarly, the ProGen family focuses on controllable and scalable protein synthesis [ 42 – 44 ] .”
From Standardization to Intelligence: The Evolution of Automated Genetic Circuit Design
Meng, Y. (2026) · International Conference on Bioinformatics and Intelligent Computing (BIC) · doi:10.1145/3809986.3810133
Neurotox: Deep learning decodes conserved hallmarks of neurotoxicity across venomous speciesPreprint
Bedraoui, A., Mejjad, S. E., Enezari, S., Hajji, F. Z. E., Galan, J. A., Fatimy, R. E., & Daouda, T. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.03.07.710323
Generating Hybrid Proteins with the MSA-TransformerPreprint
Tule, S., Davis, S. J., Koludarov, I., Mora, A., & Bodén, M. (2026) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.11.20.689447
“To realise this, we simulate mutational pathways from a source to a target sequence, using the MSA-Transformer to iteratively introduce substitutions that steer the source sequence toward the target.”
pKAKA: a protein language model for prioritizing kinase-disrupting variants in diseases.
Li, J.-T., Cheng, H.-Y., Liang, Z., Hu, J., Chu, Y.-T., Cai, R., Cao, B., Jin, Y., Xie, Y., Ju, H.-Q., et al. (2026) · Journal of genetics and genomics = Yi chuan xue bao · doi:10.1016/j.jgg.2026.03.010
Recent advances in multimodal-driven protein AI
Yang, Y., Huang, H., Zhang, J., Li, W., & Wang, W. (2026) · Biophysics Reviews · doi:10.1063/5.0273453
CoPeP: Benchmarking Continual Pretraining for Protein Language Models
Patil, D., Malviya, P., Reymond, M., Fournier, Q., & Chandar, A. P. S. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.00253
“Recently, protein language models (pLMs) have emerged as an effective and scalable solution (Rives et al., 2021; Lin et al., 2023; Madani et al., 2023; Nijkamp et al., 2023; Fournier et al., 2024).”
Generative AI-Guided Design of High-Affinity T Cell ReceptorsPreprint
Min, M. R., Li, T., Onoguchi, K., Mori, D., Demachi‐Okamura, A., Warrell, J., Machart, P., Mösch, A., Meiser, A., Pait, I. G., et al. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.02.12.705547
“More recently, generative AI and language models have been applied to the field of protein designs [26, 27].”
BOND-PEP: topology-conditioned bipartite alignment for evidence-grounded peptide binder generationPreprint
Ding, W. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.02.18.706554
“In parallel, large protein language models have enabled sequence-based representations with coevolutionary dependencies and residue-level constraints 30-35 .”
Zuo, Y., & Zhu, S. (2026) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ab.2026.116077
Patel, A., & Kundaje, A. B. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.02.05.703637
“Motivated by the success of protein language models [29, 18, 16], recent work has scaled masked and autoregressive architectures to long contexts and trained them on one or more whole genomes.”
DecoderTCR: Compositional Pretraining and Entropy-Guided Decoding for TCR-pMHC InteractionsPreprint
Lai, B., Englund, M., Bharanikumar, R., Nocedal, I., Davariashtiyani, A., Perera, J. F., & Khan, A. A. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.02.04.703820
“Autoregressive protein language models (Madani et al., 2023; Ferruz et al., 2022) can sample novel sequences, but left-to-right factorization is poorly suited for constrained loop redesign where residues are jointly constrained by both N-terminal and C-terminal context.”
Design of novel enzymes with the incorporation of noncanonical amino acids
Cheng, L., Yang, L., Song, Z., & Yu, H. (2026) · Critical Reviews in Biotechnology · doi:10.1080/07388551.2025.2612060 · Cited by 1
Jing, B., Zhang, K.-R., Zeng, H.-L., & Aurell, E. (2026) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/s00239-026-10329-0
Shao, N., & Guo, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Bioinformatics · doi:10.3389/fbinf.2025.1738737
“…phylogenetic trees that impose discrete branching, PLM-derived embedding spaces encode molecular similarity as continuous coordinates within a high-dimensional manifold, thereby reflecting gradual evolutionary transitions (LaTourrette and Garcia-Ruiz, 2022; Madani et al., 2023; Mao et al., 2019).”
Provasi, D., Konovalov, K. A., Riina, N., Cullen, O., & Filizola, M. (2026) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.5c01858 · Cited by 1
SongSage: A Large Musical Language Model with Lyric Generative Pre-trainingPreprint
Guo, J.-N., Li, J.-J., Wu, J., Li, Z.-C., Yang, Y.-J., & Wang, P. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.01153
“Building on these successes, researchers have been exploring the potential of LLMs in understanding specialized domains beyond natural language, ranging from healthcare (Singhal et al., 2023) and chemistry (Bran et al., 2024) to biology (Madani et al., 2023) and other professional fields.”
Intelligent Modeling of Protein Function and Drug Discovery Using Large Language Models: A Review
Zhang, M., Liu, B., Xu, J., Zhou, B., Sun, H., Wang, Y., Wang, J., & Xue, M. (2026) · International Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1155/int/9139921
Muneeb, M., & Ascher, D. B. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2025.12.29.696871
“…[10, 11], drug discovery [12], personalized patient communication [13], large-scale data annotation [14, 15], protein sequence analysis and prediction [16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21], clinical text processing [22], rare disease concept normalization [23], and general biomedical NLP applications [24, 25].”
Protein design and RNA design: Perspectives
Chen, X., Dai, X., & Lu, P. (2025) · Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1002/qub2.70029
“It enables de novo generation of functional proteins by conditioning on family, function, or structural annotations, with validated applications in antibody and enzyme engineering [11].”
Mitchell, T., & Wolvetang, E. (2025) · bioRxiv · doi:10.64898/2025.12.15.689182
Steering Protein Generative Models at Test-Time for Guided AAV2 Capsid Design
Viggiano, B., Lu, W. S., Zhang, X.-W., Mille-Fragoso, L. S., Gao, X.-J. J., Ashley, E. A., & Wong, W. H. (2025) · Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · doi:10.1142/9789819824755_0031
“7,8 Together, these tools accelerate candidate prioritization and substantially reduce the need for exhaustive experimental screening.”
DetoxNet: Toxicity Identification Using LLMs and Understanding its Drug-Origin for Model Fairness
Ghosh, K., & Sur, C. (2025) · 2025 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW) · doi:10.1109/icdmw69685.2025.00118
“Recent advances in generative AI and large language models (LLMs) [14] research offer a promising avenue for toxicity prediction [13] through learning the pattern of different compositions of the protein [7], [11], whose length may be as large as 40k-60k and beyond.”
Joint Design of Protein Surface and Structure Using a Diffusion Bridge ModelPreprint
Li, G., Zhao, X., Wu, F., & Laue, S. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.16675
“Protein design methods can generally be categorized into three approaches: sequence-based meth-ods [15, 30, 49], structure-based methods [50, 55, 58], and sequence-structure co-design approaches [21, 25].”
Artificial intelligence to shed light on the algal dark proteomes
Plouviez, M., & Dubreucq, E. (2025) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2025.101421
Machine Learning Approaches for Interpretable Antibody Property Prediction Using Structural Data
Michalewicz, K., Barahona, M., & Bravi, B. (2026) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-5408-8_7 · Cited by 1
“Examples include ProtBERT [84], ESM [85], and ProGen [86].”
Protein as a Second Language for LLMsPreprint
Chen, X., Li, Z., Gao, M., Zhang, Y., Leong, C. T., Li, H., & Chen, J. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.11188 · Cited by 1
“Protein representation learning with protein language models (PLMs) extends the Transformer to amino-acid strings, producing dense embeddings for property prediction (16, 3, 10, 17, 4, 6, 7) or generative design (32, 34, 29, 12).”
Transformer-based Prediction of Microbial Growth Rates from Genomic Data
Oduwole, I., He, M., Jha, R. K., Hoarfrost, A., Steen, A. D., & Emrich, S. (2025) · ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics (ACM-BCB) · doi:10.1145/3765612.3767253
“Transformer-based biological language models (BLMs) have shown remarkable ability to capture complex, long-range patterns in nucleotide and protein sequences [3, 26, 31, 39, 42], which makes them well-suited to uncover potential biological signals beyond lo-cal codon usage [8].”
Generative design of antibody Fc-variants with synthetic and programmable functional profilesPreprint
Irvine, E. B., Bikias, T., Stamkopoulos, E., Frei, L., Schürmann, N., Warrender, A. K., Schmid, H., Coukos, D., Yang, H., Minot, M., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.10.10.681689
“This training process captures the structural and evolutionary constraints embedded in protein sequences, enabling the computational design of proteins with a high likelihood of proper folding and function (Ferruz et al., 2022; Madani et al., 2023).”
InfluentialRed Teaming Generative Proteins with Unsupervised Toxin-Based Risk Embeddings
Pope, T., & Patooghy, A. (2025) · ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics (ACM-BCB) · doi:10.1145/3768322.3769027
“Generative models such as ProtGPT2 [4], ProGen [11], and RFdiffusion [16] have shown that language and diffusion models can generate de novo proteins with realistic folds and functional activity.”
Pretrained protein language models choose between sequence novelty and structural completenessPreprint
Subramanian, A. M., Martinez, Z. A., & Thomson, M. W. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.10.01.679905 · Cited by 1
“…and architectures (i.e. autoencoder vs encoder-only vs decoder-only), alphabet/vocabulary discretization (e.g. decomposing sequences into individual amino-acids or longer subsequences), and training task (i.e. autoregressive vs masked prediction objectives) vary significantly [1–3,10,17,18].”
Rapid discovery of new-to-nature protein domains by novelty-first forcing of language modelsPreprint
Subramanian, A. M., & Thomson, M. W. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.10.02.679910
“Generative PLMs can make small structural and/or functional changes, for example, by infilling nature-adjacent variants into an enzyme class [Munsamy et al., 2022, Madani et al., 2023].”
Protein Design Misuse Scoring (PDMS): A Threat Modeling Framework for Generative Protein Design
Pope, T., & Patooghy, A. (2025) · Conference on AI, Science, Engineering, and Technology (AIxSET) · doi:10.1109/aixset65682.2025.00035
“Recent models such as ProtGPT2, EvoDiff, and AlphaFold leverage large language architectures, diffusion processes, and hybrid approaches to generate novel protein sequences and structures with increasing accuracy and accessibility [1]–[3].”
Virtual cells in intelligent oncology
Deng, J., & Xu, B. (2025) · Intelligent Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.intonc.2025.09.002
Kiyanpour, F., Motahharynia, A., Ostaszewski, M., & Gheisari, Y. (2025) · Journal of Research in Medical Sciences · doi:10.4103/jrms.jrms_71_25
“[10,11] Harnessing the potential of generative AI models, we have recently developed “DrugGen,” an online tool that utilizes an enhanced transformer‑based generative model to generate valid small molecules with superior binding affinities and docking performance.”
Guariso, D., Adewoyin, R. A., Aguilar, G. R., Guerrero, O. A., & Davies, A. R. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2025.103203
Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models in Differential Abundance AnalysisPreprint
Franco-Alba, R., Goryanin, I. V., & Goryanin, I. (2025) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.06.04.657820
“…[4], (cid:129) for “summarizing laboratory reports (eg, key findings, abnormal findings, notes on uncommon pathogens, advice on antibiotic selection, and next steps in testing)” [11], (cid:129) for generating “protein sequences with predictable functions across large protein families” [22].”
Ashraf, F. B., Zhang, Z., Paco, K., Mendivil, M. P., Lay, J. A., Ray, A., & Lonardi, S. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.12.19.629473 · Cited by 3
“Stochastic context-free grammars were also used to capture long-distance dependencies in amino acid positions [9–12].”
Discriminative protein sequence modelling with Latent Space DiffusionPreprint
Quinn, E., Jebali, G., Seince, M., & Bent, O. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.18551
Metadata
- Authors
- Madani, A., Krause, B., Greene, E. R., Subramanian, S., Mohr, B. P., Holton, J. M., Olmos, J. L., Xiong, C., Sun, Z. Z., Socher, R., Fraser, J. S., & Naik, N.
- Affiliations
- Salesforce (United States) (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Madani, Ali
- Naik, Nikhil
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Biotechnology
- Published
- 2023-01-26
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1099-1106
- ISSN
- 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
- 1087-0156
- 1546-1696
- PMC
- PMC10400306
- OpenAlex
- W4318071656
- Cited by
- 1,078
- References
- 80
- Citations by year
- 2026: 314 · 2025: 320 · 2024: 302 · 2023: 141
- FWCI
- 95.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (GM123159)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
- Keywords
- large language models, protein sequence generation, protein design, protein families, lysozyme, chorismate mutase, malate dehydrogenase, catalytic efficiency, controllable generation, protein engineering
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acid Sequence, Chorismate Mutase, Estrogens, Conjugated (USP), Language, Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-05, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-05 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review