Cited by 730Cancer-related Molecular PathwaysCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsGenomics and Rare Diseases

TP53 Variations in Human Cancers: New Lessons from the IARC TP53 Database and Genomics Data: Human Mutation

Bouaoun, Liacine, Sonkin, Dmitriy, Ardin, Maude, Hollstein, Monica, Byrnes, Graham, Zavadil, Jiri, Olivier, Magali·2016·Human Mutation

Abstract

TP53 gene mutations are one of the most frequent somatic events in cancer. The IARC TP53 Database (http://p53.iarc.fr) is a popular resource that compiles occurrence and phenotype data on TP53 germline and somatic variations linked to human cancer. The deluge of data coming from cancer genomic studies generates new data on TP53 variations and attracts a growing number of database users for the interpretation of TP53 variants. Here, we present the current contents and functionalities of the IARC TP53 Database and perform a systematic analysis of TP53 somatic mutation data extracted from this database and from genomic data repositories. This analysis showed that IARC has more TP53 somatic mutation data than genomic repositories (29,000 vs. 4,000). However, the more complete screening achieved by genomic studies highlighted some overlooked facts about TP53 mutations, such as the presence of a significant number of mutations occurring outside the DNA-binding domain in specific cancer types. We also provide an update on TP53 inherited variants including the ones that should be considered as neutral frequent variations. We thus provide an update of current knowledge on TP53 variations in human cancer as well as inform users on the efficient use of the IARC TP53 Database.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/humu.23035

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bouaoun, L., Sonkin, D., Ardin, M., Hollstein, M., Byrnes, G., Zavadil, J., & Olivier, M.
Affiliations
  • Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (FR)
  • National Cancer Institute (US)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • Group of Molecular Mechanisms and Biomarkers; International Agency for Research on Cancer; Lyon Cedex 08 69372 France
Corresponding author
Olivier, Magali
Venue
Human Mutation
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-07-08
Volume
37
Issue
9
Pages
865-876
ISSN
1059-7794 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2472035483
Cited by
730
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 94 · 2021: 118 · 2020: 102 · 2019: 92 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 6
FWCI
39.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Mutation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Centre International de Recherche sur le Cancer
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
TP53 mutation, somatic mutations, germline mutations, cancer genomics, variant interpretation
MeSH terms
Protein Domains, Humans, Mutation, Neoplasms, Phenotype, Software, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genomics, Databases, Genetic, Data Curation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review