Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 668

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sequestration of T cells in bone marrow in the setting of glioblastoma and other intracranial tumors

Open access
Chongsathidkiet, Pakawat, Jackson, Christina, Koyama, Shohei, Loebel, Franziska, Cui, Xiuyu, Farber, S. Harrison, Woroniecka, Karolina, Elsamadicy, Aladine A., Dechant, Cosette A., Kemeny, Hanna R., Sanchez-Perez, Luis, Cheema, Tooba A., Souders, Nicholas C., Herndon, James E., Coumans, Jean-Valery, Everitt, Jeffrey I., Nahed, Brian V., Sampson, John H., Gunn, Michael D., Martuza, Robert L., Dranoff, Glenn, Curry, William T., Fecci, Peter E.·2018·Nature Medicine

Abstract

T cell dysfunction contributes to tumor immune escape in patients with cancer and is particularly severe amidst glioblastoma (GBM). Among other defects, T cell lymphopenia is characteristic, yet often attributed to treatment. We reveal that even treatment-naïve subjects and mice with GBM can harbor AIDS-level CD4 counts, as well as contracted, T cell–deficient lymphoid organs. Missing naïve T cells are instead found sequestered in large numbers in the bone marrow. This phenomenon characterizes not only GBM but a variety of other cancers, although only when tumors are introduced into the intracranial compartment. T cell sequestration is accompanied by tumor-imposed loss of S1P1 from the T cell surface and is reversible upon precluding S1P1 internalization. In murine models of GBM, hindering S1P1 internalization and reversing sequestration licenses T cell–activating therapies that were previously ineffective. Sequestration of T cells in bone marrow is therefore a tumor-adaptive mode of T cell dysfunction, whose reversal may constitute a promising immunotherapeutic adjunct. Patients with glioblastoma experience lymphopenia and sequestration of T cells in the bone marrow, which is recapitulated in mice with brain tumors, where the reversible nature of this effect is demonstrated by an approach that enables the efficacy of other immunotherapeutics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41591-018-0135-2

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Cited by

See all 668

Metadata

Authors
Chongsathidkiet, P., Jackson, C., Koyama, S., Loebel, F., Cui, X., Farber, S. H., Woroniecka, K., Elsamadicy, A. A., Dechant, C. A., Kemeny, H. R., Sanchez-Perez, L., Cheema, T. A., Souders, N. C., Herndon, J. E., Coumans, J.-V., Everitt, J. I., Nahed, B. V., Sampson, J. H., Gunn, M. D., Martuza, R. L., Dranoff, G., Curry, W. T., & Fecci, P. E.
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2018-08-13
Volume
24
Issue
9
Pages
1459-1468
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W2887361912
Cited by
668
References
44
FWCI
20.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sequestration of T cells in bone marrow in the setting of glioblastoma and other intracranial tumors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41591-018-0135-2
The paper
Chongsathidkiet, P., Jackson, C., Koyama, S., Loebel, F., Cui, X., Farber, S. H., Woroniecka, K., Elsamadicy, A. A., Dechant, C. A., Kemeny, H. R., Sanchez-Perez, L., Cheema, T. A., Souders, N. C., Herndon, J. E., Coumans, J.-V., Everitt, J. I., Nahed, B. V., Sampson, J. H., Gunn, M. D., . . . Fecci, P. E. (2018). Sequestration of T cells in bone marrow in the setting of glioblastoma and other intracranial tumors. Nature Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0135-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.