Cited by 110Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareMachine Learning in Healthcare

Steps to avoid overuse and misuse of machine learning in clinical research

Open access
Volovici, Victor, Syn, Nicholas L., Ercole, Ari, Zhao, Joseph J., Liu, Nan·2022·Nature Medicine

Abstract

Machine learning algorithms are a powerful tool in healthcare, but sometimes perform no better than traditional statistical techniques. Steps should be taken to ensure that algorithms are not overused or misused, in order to provide genuine benefit for patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41591-022-01961-6

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Wynants, L. et al. Br. Med. J. 369, m1328 (2020).
  2. Abràmoff, M. D. et al. npj Digit. Med. 1, 39 (2018).
  3. Uddin, S. et al. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 19, 281 (2019).
  4. Shashikumar, S. P. et al. npj Digit. Med. 4, 134 (2021).
  5. Richens, J. G. et al. Nat. Commun. 11, 3923 (2020).
  6. Andaur Navarro, C. L. et al. Br. Med. J. 375, n2281 (2021).
  7. Twinanda, A. P. et al. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 36, 86-97 (2017).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Volovici, V., Syn, N. L., Ercole, A., Zhao, J. J., & Liu, N.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Volovici, Victor
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2022-09-12
Volume
28
Issue
10
Pages
1996-1999
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W4295472519
Cited by
110
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
7.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Duke-NUS Medical School
  • National University of Singapore
  • National University Health System
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
machine learning, clinical research, algorithmic bias, clinical decision support, patient benefit
MeSH terms
Machine Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review