Cited by 53Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationClinical practice guidelines implementationMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Reporting standards for the use of large language model-linked chatbots for health advice.

Huo, Bright, Cacciamani, Giovanni E., Collins, Gary S., McKechnie, Tyler, Lee, Yung, Guyatt, Gordon·2023·Nature Medicine

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41591-023-02656-2

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Standardized frameworks are under development to establish detailed reporting standards to help authors design and report these studies.

    “Standardized frameworks are under development to establish detailed reporting standards to help authors design and report these studies.18”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huo, B., Cacciamani, G. E., Collins, G. S., McKechnie, T., Lee, Y., & Guyatt, G.
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Huo, Bright
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2023-11-13
Volume
29
Issue
12
Pages
2988-2988
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W4388625750
Cited by
53
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Cancer Research UK (27294)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
large language models, chatbots, health advice, reporting guidelines, generative AI, health information accuracy, readability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review