The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of variability in human kidney organoids
Open accessAbstract
The utility of human pluripotent stem cell–derived kidney organoids relies implicitly on the robustness and transferability of the protocol. Here we analyze the sources of transcriptional variation in a specific kidney organoid protocol. Although individual organoids within a differentiation batch showed strong transcriptional correlation, we noted significant variation between experimental batches, particularly in genes associated with temporal maturation. Single-cell profiling revealed shifts in nephron patterning and proportions of component cells. Distinct induced pluripotent stem cell clones showed congruent transcriptional programs, with interexperimental and interclonal variation also strongly associated with nephron patterning. Epithelial cells isolated from organoids aligned with total organoids at the same day of differentiation, again implicating relative maturation as a confounder. This understanding of experimental variation facilitated an optimized analysis of organoid-based disease modeling, thereby increasing the utility of kidney organoids for personalized medicine and functional genomics. A transcriptional analysis of kidney organoids reveals batch effects as the key drivers of variation, mainly through differences in maturity, and provides a list of highly variable genes and a method for estimating differentiation stage for improved disease modeling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01 · Cited by 86,835
Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis
Schindelin, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., Frise, E., Kaynig, V., Longair, M., Pietzsch, T., Preibisch, S., Rueden, C., Saalfeld, S., Schmid, B., et al. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2019 · Cited by 66,890
STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner
Dobin, A., Davis, C. A., Schlesinger, F., Drenkow, J., Zaleski, C., Jha, S., Batut, P., Chaisson, M., & Gingeras, T. R. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 · Cited by 51,709
Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J., & Smyth, G. K. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 · Cited by 41,364
limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies
Ritchie, M. E., Phipson, B., Wu, D., Hu, Y., Law, C. W., Shi, W., & Smyth, G. K. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv007 · Cited by 40,458
Self-citationfeatureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features
Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K., & Shi, W. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656 · Cited by 27,219
Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Adult Human Fibroblasts by Defined Factors
Takahashi, K., Tanabe, K., Ohnuki, M., Narita, M., Ichisaka, T., Tomoda, K., & Yamanaka, S. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019 · Cited by 20,221
Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species
Butler, A., Hoffman, P., Smibert, P., Papalexi, E., & Satija, R. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4096 · Cited by 13,174
A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data
Robinson, M. D., & Oshlack, A. (2010) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-3-r25 · Cited by 7,876
Self-citationGene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias
Young, M. D., Wakefield, M. J., Smyth, G. K., & Oshlack, A. (2010) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-2-r14 · Cited by 7,107
Self-citation
Cited by
Transfer learning enables predictions in network biology
Theodoris, C. V., Xiao, L., Chopra, A., Chaffin, M. D., Al Sayed, Z. R., Hill, M. C., Mantineo, H., Brydon, E. M., Zeng, Z., Liu, X. S., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06139-9 · Cited by 1,193
SARS-CoV-2 infects the human kidney and drives fibrosis in kidney organoids
Jansen, J., Reimer, K. C., Nagai, J. S., Varghese, F. S., Overheul, G. J., de Beer, M., Roverts, R., Daviran, D., Fermin, L. A. S., Willemsen, B., et al. (2022) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2021.12.010 · Cited by 259
Bioengineering Approaches for the Advanced Organoid Research
Yi, S. A., Zhang, Y., Rathnam, C., Pongkulapa, T., & Lee, K. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202007949 · Cited by 218
Subramanian, A., Sidhom, E.-H., Emani, M., Vernon, K., Sahakian, N., Zhou, Y., Kost-Alimova, M., Slyper, M., Waldman, J., Dionne, D., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13382-0 · Cited by 211
Applications of organoids for cancer biology and precision medicine
Lo, Y.-H., Karlsson, K., & Kuo, C. J. (2020) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-020-0102-y · Cited by 182
Metadata
- Authors
- Phipson, B., Er, P. X., Combes, A. N., Forbes, T. A., Howden, S. E., Zappia, L., Yen, H.-J., Lawlor, K. T., Hale, L. J., Sun, J., Wolvetang, E., Takasato, M., Oshlack, A., & Little, M. H.
- Venue
- Nature Methods
- Published
- 2018-12-20
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 79-87
- ISSN
- 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-7105
- OpenAlex
- W2904111838
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 8.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of variability in human kidney organoids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41592-018-0253-2
- The paper
- Phipson, B., Er, P. X., Combes, A. N., Forbes, T. A., Howden, S. E., Zappia, L., Yen, H.-J., Lawlor, K. T., Hale, L. J., Sun, J., Wolvetang, E., Takasato, M., Oshlack, A., & Little, M. H. (2019). Evaluation of variability in human kidney organoids. Nature Methods. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-018-0253-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
